Initiatives here to stay so pols better deal with it

Tuesday’s election showed that initiatives are increasingly becoming a key way to make major government decisions in Washington.

Whether one likes the trend for people to take decisions out of the hands of elected representatives or not, it’s time to recognize the growing role to direct democracy. State residents and their political leaders should begin thinking about making adjustments that reflect the change.

Tim Eyman’s Initiative 747 rolled to an easy victory. Its main thrust is to limit the ability of elected officials to make tax decisions without a vote of the people. But the initiative binge is anything but an Eyman-only phenomenon. Indeed, some of those who like to treat him as a poster child for poor public policymaking are running their own initiatives.

All told, 10 initiatives to the people have passed in four years, the most rapid pace in state history. The previous highwater mark was 10 over six years, 1932-38.

This year, even while property tax hikes were being limited by I-747, Initiative 773 enacted a huge tax increase on tobacco. Another initiative set up a new bureaucracy for overseeing in-home health care and paved the way for unionization of care workers.

Those are such contradictory decisions that one must ask: Do people know what they want? But they do. They want to decide for themselves on many major issues.

That trend is not the end of representative democracy, as Eyman tried to point out in the face of heavy campaign rhetoric. It is a simple reality, one that we shouldn’t find too surprising in a state where people have long treasured the power of the initiative and the referendum.

New realities call for adjustment and reassessment. If voters themselves are going to make so many of the major financial decisions for the state, does the Legislature have to meet every year? Maybe not. Certainly, the presumption must be that the Legislature should be in session fewer days whenever it meets, in both budget years and non-budget years.

And we ought to ask ourselves whether we really need two houses of the Legislature. Look at the split in the state House and Senate after this election. There is an absolutely identical 25-24 ratio in favor of Democrats in both houses: 50-48 in the House of Representatives and 25-24 in the Senate. What’s the difference between one and the other?

Of course, some of the motivation behind our questioning (and behind some of the public’s voting) is pure frustration with the Legislature. Last year’s legislative session was a colossal exercise in partisanship, irresponsibility and gridlock. Tuesday’s election at least erased the gridlock excuse, by breaking the House of Representatives’ tie between Democrats and Republicans.

Democrats now have an opportunity to show that they are willing and able to exercise power responsibly. If they do, perhaps the trend toward government by initiative may be slowed somewhat, but don’t plan on a halt to initiative lawmaking. Politicians and the public ought to be thinking instead about how to make the best of the new reality.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: Moscow’s a paradise, Trump is Navalny, and up is down

If it’s difficult for some in the GOP to keep up with shifts in allegiances, Trump and Tucker are here for it.

School bond supermajority requirement is unacceptable

I’m looking at the Spokesman-Review online like I do every day, and… Continue reading

PUD’s powerline plans needed explanation sooner

The article in the Herald about Snohomish PUD’s project to tie the… Continue reading

What’s behind Trump’s appeal?

Can anyone tell me why these Sons and Daughters of the Confederacy,… Continue reading

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 22

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Jaime Benedict, who works as a substitute teacher, waves to drivers on the corner of Mukilteo Speedway and Harbor Pointe Boulevard while holding a sign in support of the $240 million capital bond proposal for Mukilteo School District on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2020 in Mukilteo, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Bar set unfairly high for passage of school bonds

Requiring 60 percent approval denies too many students the schools and facilities they deserve.

Comment: Presidential primary launches state’s election season

With ballots in the mail, here’s what to know and how to prepare for making your choice for U.S. president.

Keep Clark Park gazebo; it holds memories for many

Just want to put my two cents in about the removal of… Continue reading

Focus more effort on preventing opioid addiction

A recent Herald editorial cited a report from U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen’s… Continue reading

Navalny’s death loss for Russia, world

The world was informed recently that Alexei Navalny died in a Russian… Continue reading

Comment: Primaries offers chance to judge vote-by-mail’s success

So far, state caucuses and primaries have seen low turnout. Will mailed ballots see higher participation?

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.