Insiders hold firm control

The revolving door keeps spinning in Washington, D.C., leaving power in the hands of the well-connected, not the public.

Two nonpartisan reports underscore this never-ending, self-perpetuating problem.

An analysis by Public Citizen and the Center for Responsive Politics, released earlier this month, found that more than 1,400 former members of Congress, Capitol Hill staff members or other federal employees had registered as lobbyists for the financial services sector since the beginning of last year — just as Wall Street reform legislation was taking shape. That included at least 73 former lawmakers, and 148 former staffers who had connections to congressional banking committees.

This week, the Sunlight Foundation reported that the nation’s telecommunications giants — including Comcast, Verizon, AT&T and Time Warner Cable — had recently formed an army of 276 former government officials to lobby Congress and the Obama administration on upcoming overhauls to broadband and Internet rules. Eighteen of those lobbyists are former members of Congress.

“We’ve heard promises to stop the spin of the revolving door between government and lobbying, but that’s clearly not happening,” the Sunlight Foundation’s Paul Blumenthal said in a release that accompanied this week’s report.

Indeed. Even President Obama’s pledge to put a stop to such insider influence quickly fell flat. After signing an executive order to that effect, the president granted a waiver to former Raytheon lobbyist William J. Lynn so he could become deputy secretary of defense. PolitiFact, a fact-checking project of the St. Petersburg Times, lists Obama’s campaign promise to close the revolving door as broken.

“Wall Street hires former members of Congress and their staff for a reason,” David Arkush of Public Citizen told The Washington Post. “These people are influential because they have personal relationships with current members and staff. It’s hard to say no to your friends, but that’s what Congress needs to do.”

Well, if it wants to pass any meaningful reforms, anyway.

Polls show anti-incumbent sentiment running deep as the mid-term elections approach, and the perception that Congress is in the pockets of entrenched special interests is fueling at least some of it. For good reason.

Given that, we think the smart move for congressional incumbents is to champion real reforms to stem insider influence and the effect of special-interest money in campaigns. One would be to create an ethics panel that is independent from Congress, rather than having Congress police itself.

Another would be to support a constitutional amendment to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court and limit the funding of political campaigns by corporate, union and other private, special interests.

Until then, the revolving door of influence and favors will keep on spinning. And the public interest will be left outside.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Advocates for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities rallied on the state capitol steps on Jan. 17. The group asked for rate increases for support staff and more funding for affordable housing. (Laurel Demkovich/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Support those caring for state’s most vulnerable

Increasing pay for care workers of those with developmental disabilities can save the state money.

Klein: Why Trump’s, GOP’s slim victories don’t feel that way

Trump and the Republicans won on ‘bad vibes’ for Democrats. That will be tough to govern with.

Harrop; Behold Trump’s new coin of the realm

Trump is selling $TRUMP, a cryptocurrency that surged in value at its fortuitously timed release.

Comment: MAGA world’s split is made-for-TV drama

And President Trump, a winner regardless who wins, is here for every moment of it.

Dowd: Trump brings a chill to D.C. that will persist

Yet, Trump was assisted in his second victory by Biden’s hubris and his staff’s secrecy.

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence visit the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington, Jan. 21, 2019. (Sarah Silbiger/The New York Times)
Editorial: What would MLK Jr. do? What, now, will we do?

Monday marks the presidential inauguration and the King holiday, offering guidance on the way forward.

Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial is framed by autumnal colors at the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
Comment: Defining King’s ‘beloved community’

The term inspired MLK Jr.’s social justice work and persists for others to continue that work.

Paul: Decline in geriatric care a concern not just for seniors

As the population over 65 grows, we’re losing geriatricians to better-paying fields. Yet, there’s hope.

Comment: Trump’s health picks may pose greatest threat to U.S.

What mixed messages from RFK Jr. and others could affect parents’ attitudes about vaccination.

Eco-nomics: A brief history of how the climate crisis unfolded

A review of the facts and dates makes clear that ramping up fossil fuel use takes us in the wrong direction.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.