Inspections required to prevent proliferation

Trying may indeed be the first step toward failure, but that maxim is a little frightening when applied to nuclear proliferation.

Last week, the Bush administration switched gears and declared it would not support inspections to verify a new nuclear weapons treaty that would ban the accumulation of nuclear material and extend the Non-Nuclear Proliferation Treaty to states that have recently gone nuclear, such as Pakistan, India and Israel.

The treaty, known as the Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty, would represent a key deterrent for nations seeking to acquire material for nuclear weapons. Without verification, rogue nations could obtain nuclear material and stay below the world’s radar.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

But the State Department disagrees, saying, “even with extensive verification measures, we will not have high confidence in our ability to monitor compliance.” That may be true, but that doesn’t mean we should scrap inspections altogether.

The administration’s move is damaging on multiple fronts. It seems to accept nuclear proliferation as a fait accompli, as if nuclear weapons were bound to wind up in the hands of every nation sooner or later. To be sure, part of the rationale behind inspections is to provide a policing organization, but the primary goal of verification is to provide a deterrent for ever obtaining nuclear material in the first place. This decision weakens that deterrent and creates opportunities for nations to defy what will now become a toothless treaty.

Our nuclear stockpile would be immune from inspections, so it’s not as if our nuclear secrets would be in danger. And as we learned from our invasion of Iraq, independent inspections have a better track record of demonstrating a country’s weapons capabilities than our current intelligence bureaucracy does. Implementing verification procedures would at least provide some chance of deterrence or monitoring – something which giving up on independent inspections and relying on the CIA doesn’t offer.

If the Bush administration is attempting to repair bridges and expand the international presence in Iraq, such a unilateralist stance on a treaty that most of the world was ready to sign is hardly reconciliatory. Questionable moves like this will continue to drive away the world in the face of American defiance.

Giving up on inspections fails to increase the security of the world, and only adds fuel the dangerous fire of nuclear proliferation.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, June 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

AP government students at Henry M. Jackson High School visited the state Capitol this spring and watched as a resolution they helped draft was adopted in the Senate as part of the Building Bridges Future Leaders Academy. (Josh Estes / Building Bridges)
Comment: Future leaders learn engineering of building bridges

Here’s what Jackson High government students learned with the help of local officials and lawmakers.

Washington State Attorney General Nick Brown, speaks with reporters during a press conference in Seattle, on April 4, 2025. Brown has filed a lawsuit accusing the Adams County sheriff of sharing inmate information with federal immigration agents in defiance of a state law meant to limit collaboration between state law enforcement officers and federal immigration agencies. (Jordan Gale/The New York Times)
Comment: The reach and reason of sanctuary policies

They can’t protect people from ICE raids but local governments aren’t required to assist the agency.

Comment: Early cancer diagnosis can be key in saving lives

An act in Congress would allow Medicare coverage for early-detection tests for a range of cancers.

Comment: In wildfire crisis, options for forests, communities

By thinning threatened forests, mass timber can use that material for homes, businesses and more.

Forum: Everett’s land-use plan should keep affordable housing tool

Its comprehensive plan should keep inclusionary zoning, setting aside housing for working families.

The Buzz: ‘Your majesty, the peasants are revolting!’

Well, that’s a little harsh, but we’re sure the ‘No Kings’ protesters clean up well after their marches.

50 years after “Jaws,” look at sharks differently

This summer, the world celebrates the 50th anniversary of “Jaws,” the blockbuster… Continue reading

Church leader was calling for a religious riot

I was stunned by a recent letter praising pastor Ross Johnston and… Continue reading

Holocaust was rolled out slowly, too

The Holocaust didn’t happen overnight. Eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion and staging… Continue reading

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: Let’s remember the ‘peaceably’ part of First Amendment

Most of us understand the responsibilities of free speech; here’s how we remind President Trump.

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If it’s jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.