Iraq report offers help; Bush needs to accept it

If President Bush is to salvage even meager success out of his disastrous Iraq policy, he should embrace and act quickly on the recommendations announced Wednesday by the Iraq Study Group.

It’s the most objective, thorough, bipartisan advice Bush will get. It offers no silver bullets – none exist, the panel noted – but it does outline a series of diplomatic and military steps that, if executed well, could lead to relative stability where anarchy increasingly reigns. That’s the new measure of success because it’s as close to “victory” as we can now hope to get.

The blunt report, the consensus of 10 seasoned and respected leaders – five Republicans and five Democrats – is sharply critical of the administration’s handling of the war and calls for dramatic changes. It doesn’t include a specific timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops, but it does call for a gradual pullback as a way of making clear to the Iraqi leadership that it must solve its internal conflicts and take responsibility for its own security. It suggests expediting the training of Iraqi troops by embedding thousands of U.S. military advisers with Iraqi forces, which also would allow our combat troops to begin leaving.

The report envisions a U.S. combat force of 70,000 to 80,000 in early 2008, compared with about 150,000 now.

The panel recommends a diplomatic offensive that includes Iraq’s neighbors, all of whom have a vital interest in a stable Iraq. That includes two U.S. nemeses, Iran and Syria, which the administration has so far refused to engage. Panel co-chairman James Baker, who served as secretary of state under Bush’s father, put that short-sighted policy into perspective: “For 40 years, we talked to the Soviet Union, during a time when they were committed to wiping us off the face of the Earth. So you talk to your enemies, not just your friends.”

The administration also needs to re-commit to the Arab-Israeli peace process, the panel said, which is even more central to Middle East stability.

Failing to take such steps, the commission concludes, risks seeing a deteriorating situation plunge into chaos, creating a humanitarian crisis and a haven for terrorists.

An administration that has done little but fumble in Iraq needed help. The Iraq Study Group has provided it. For the good of our national security, our standing in the world and especially our troops, the president needs to swallow his pride and accept it.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Getty Images
Editorial: Lawmakers should outline fairness of millionaires tax

How the revenue will be used, in part to make state taxes less regressive, is key to its acceptance.

Comment: Federal bankers deserve an F on climate threat

In dismissing the financial threat from the climate crisis, Fed bankers set the nation up for failure.

Comment: The federal agency brain drain will have dire effects

More than 10,000 workers with STEM doctorates are gone. Who will solve crises and innovate for America?

Ask lawmakers to reject bill to bar removal from tent encampments

Proposed Washington House Bill 2489, per media, is “the Shelters Not Penalties… Continue reading

Heritage Foundation to blame for Trump’s return

Do you recall the day when you lost faith in our democratic… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s election manuevers about more than ego-boosting

The president likely has designs on manipulating the midterms by casting doubt on results.

A horse near transmission lines in Houston, Sept. 20, 2023. Texas has grown to be the second-largest solar power producer in the country. (Annie Mulligan / The New York Times)
Comment: Two energy roads, different futures for world’s climate

The paths for fossil fuels and renewables are set, with countries choosing diverging road maps.

The Buzz: In celebration of bunnies, from Bugs to Bad

We can’t help but see some characteristics shared between Elmer Fudd and Donald Trump.

Comment: Revolutionary War fought by ordinary men and women

Early battles, such as at Moore’s Creek Bridge, and won by volunteer loyalists inspired others to join the fight.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.