Is it a problem to say ‘you’re welcome’?

With all of the letters published in The Herald over the last month regarding manners, you’d think this problem rates up there with feeding and housing the homeless in Everett.

It’s my opinion that any display of courtesy cannot and should not be a bad thing, no matter how it’s said. Even at my age, I don’t like being called sir by a young woman, but I understand that courtesy displayed is always a good thing, no matter how my ego feels about it. I also understand the political correctness that has infiltrated our world of good manners and common sense like a cancer in our society.

The one thing I do have trouble with is the phrase “no problem,” which I hear more and more in our service industry every day. From the common barista to the server at the restaurant, I shiver in my seat when someone in the world of customer service says these words. When I’m their customer, it’s their job to fulfill my request – as long as I’m not rude or out of line.

I’m wondering why anyone would say the words “no problem.” Is it because my request is occasionally a problem, but not today? Could it be they’re way too busy with more important requests other than mine? Or is it because so many people say things and don’t really think about what they mean or how someone might be offended? What happened to “thank you” or “you’re welcome”? What happened to “my pleasure” or “as you wish”? What about something simple like, “certainly”?

It’s funny how the world of customer service has seemed to slip into darkness under the guise of “no problem.” If my request is really “not a problem,” then show a little common courtesy when telling me so.

Ken Hopstad

Marysville

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau logo is seen through a window at the CFPB offices in Washington on Sept. 23, 2019. Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Ting Shen/The New York Times)
Editorial: Keep medical debt off credit score reporting

The federal CFPB is challenging a state law that bars medical debt from credit bureaus’ consideration.

Schwab: Release the files? Sure; Trump has nothing to hide.

The man’s an open book. And scandals that would destroy others’ political lives are a MAGA selling point.

Few seem to understand property taxes, Port of Everett included

Regarding the Nov. 13 front-page article about the Port of Everett’s 2026… Continue reading

Protect access and conservation of our public lands

I am one of millions of Americans who love our nation’s public… Continue reading

Won’t somone explain tariffs to Trump?

To borrow from the caption for The Herald Editorial Board’s Nov. 15… Continue reading

No Kings rally: Kids say darndest things

At Snohomish’s very large and very peaceful No Kings rally there was… Continue reading

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s $2,000 tariff rebates are a shell game

Most Americans have already paid $1,800 in price increases from the tariffs. It’s another distraction.

Comment: If Trump cares about affordability, he must show it

It will take more than reducing tariffs on a few items; he must show he understands consumers’ pain.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.