It levels the playing field across our state

I have just finished rereading the text of this measure as it appears in the State of Washington Voters Pamphlet. Perhaps I am missing something in this measure regarding the allowable locations of “electronic scratch ticket machines.” The way I read the measure, the location of these machines will be limited to existing licensed locations. This is further defined to be only in locations that require a customer to be at least 21 years of age. Thus minors cannot participate in the use of these machines.

This measure also spells out how the income from these machines is disbursed, down to the amount that must be allocated to the “problem-gambler problem.” Under the existing allocation the income from these machines goes only to the tribes and no state tax is paid on the proceeds from these machines for any purpose.

What is wrong with leveling the playing field so all establishment can compete for the dollars that are being spent anyway? Even this in some sense is a misnomer, since when it is all said and done the tribes will still get to keep all of their monies and those not on tribal land will be paying taxes.

Further reading of this measure states that the distribution of these machines shall be through currently state-licensed outlets. As to the statement that 65 percent will be sent out of state does not recognize that establishments having those machines must cover their cost or they could not afford to have them. This not only will include wages but the taxes they will pay on handling the money (income) from these machines.

It is amazing to me that in all of the negative ads, it only states “Paid for by the committee against I-892.” Nowhere does it tell you that this campaign receives its major financing from the tribes because they are afraid of losing the “goose that is laying the golden egg.”

DONALD H. ROBBERS

Marysville

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: From opposite ends of crime, a plea for justice reform

A survivor of crime and an incarceree support a bill to forge better outcomes for both communities.

Comment: Misnamed Fix Our Forest Act would worsen wildfire risk

The U.S. Senate bill doesn’t fund proven strategies and looks to increase harvest in protective forests.

Comment: City governments should stay out of the grocery market

Rather than run its own grocery stores, government should get out of the way of private companies.

Forum: Grading students needs shift from testing to achievement

Standardized tests are alienating students and teachers. Focus education on participation and goals.

Forum: Varied interests for ecology, civil rights can speak together

A recent trip to Portland revealed themes common to concerns for protecting salmon, wildlife and civil rights.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

The Buzz: Shutdown? What shutdown? We’ got 20,000 emails to read.

Trump was tired of talking about affordability, until emails from a former friend were released.

Schwab: Democratic Party was caught between caving and caring

Those who ended the shutdown ended the challenge but restored vital benefits, because Democrats care.

A state income tax is fair and can fund our needs

The constant tug-of-war between raising taxes and cutting spending is maddening. The… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.