Lawyers can’t offer medical care

Doctors are screaming for tort reform that would cap malpractice awards. Patients are screaming for justice when they are victims of malpractice. Lawyers are seeking substantial rewards for their own pockets as they also seek justice for their patient/clients. Insurance companies seeking to protect their profits charge the doctors more for their insurance. The doctors pass the high cost of premiums onto the patients, and the patients scream about the high cost of medical care. I suspect that the doctors will win this battle because we can’t go to the lawyers for our medical care.

My question is, if the doctors do win, will they pass those savings on to the patients, or use their savings to line their own pockets?

Ron Larsen

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Warner Bros.
"The Lord of the Rings"
Editorial: Gerrymandering presents seductive temptation

Like J.R.R. Tolkein’s ‘One Ring,’ partisan redistricting offers a corrupting, destabilizing power.

Schwab: Trump continues course blithely as voters begin to rouse

Against a backdrop of Democratic election wins, Trump continued with the same old, same old.

Democracy is worth staying, fighting for

In response to a recent letter to the editor suggesting we offer… Continue reading

Issue of Epstein files hasn’t gone away for Trump

I really don’t care about your politics but I’m really concerned that… Continue reading

Bouie: Election shows Trump as albatross around GOP’s neck

Voters are telling Trump and Republicans that they’ve baldy misread the mandate of the 2024 election.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Stephens: Why do dumb ideas — from left and right — persist?

A little reflection on past failures ought to be enough to have us keep searching for solutions.

Comment: Food banks are indispensable, but can’t replace SNAP

SNAP has been the most effective anti-poverty program in U.S. history. Its work must be restored.

Comment: California’s gerrymander is sleazy, but necessary

And, as Tuesday’s vote shows, it had the support of a majority of Californians who oppose Trump’s agenda.

Comment: The devil for GOP is in the details of the election

If they care to listen, Republicans were given a warning about their prospects in the 2026 midterms.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.