McArdle: Except for accents, U.S., U.K. politics sound alike

For both, as parties abandon the center for the fringes, chaos has weakened the parties in power.

By Megan McArdle

The Washington Post

When I was in London recently, a British friend offered effusive thanks for the United States; whenever he was feeling particularly aghast at the disarray of his country’s political institutions, he said, he just looked across the Atlantic and instantly felt much better.

Funny, I told him, I was about to say the same about Britain.

There’s been a lot of talk lately about the erosion of the longstanding U.S.-U.K. “special relationship.” Yet in one respect the countries are more tightly linked than ever before: Both are enduring a collective nervous breakdown of their political institutions.

It is only the latest symptom of America’s madness that Donald Trump just spent nearly a week making xenophobic and un-American remarks about “the Squad,” the four ultra-progressive congresswomen who also happen to be women of color. And that in consequence, the House Democratic Caucus, filled with members who normally seethe at their radical colleagues, is now loyally defending the biggest thorns in its side.

Time for a soothing peek across the Atlantic, where the Conservative Party leadership election is drawing to a close. It very much looks as if Theresa May, stepping down as prime minister, will be replaced on July 23 by former London mayor Boris Johnson, a theatrical politician who provides hours of fun for an amazed press corps.

On Thursday, in anticipation of Johnson’s presumed victory, the House of Commons — controlled by Johnson’s Tory colleagues — voted for a measure that would prevent him from using a parliamentary maneuver to force a “no deal” Brexit come Oct. 31.

Despite the lunacy of the springtime Brexit brawl that prompted May to resign as prime minister and open the way for Johnson, the true craziness is that somehow the Conservative Party still has a leadership election worth worrying about. The party is a shambles, its reputation in tatters, but amazingly the Tories are still holding onto power, albeit with a weakening grip.

That almost defies explanation. After all, David Cameron, May’s predecessor, called the 2016 referendum on leaving the European Union, thrusting both his party and his country into the current mess. Under May’s leadership, things somehow, incredibly, got worse. After more than two years of tireless work, May failed to secure a parliamentary majority to do anything about Brexit; not to go through with it or to call it off. Now they’re about to get Boris Johnson, which will only be a different sort of insanity.

Yet look at the alternative. Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour Party’s current leader, is an unreconstructed 1970s radical. His party is promising to nationalize private utilities and expropriate shareholders, along with raising taxes and increasing spending. And on the most important issue currently facing his country, Corbyn has been just as incapable as the Tories of sketching out a plausible, coherent path forward on Brexit.

Meanwhile, Corbyn’s amiable tolerance for anti-Semitism has gotten so bad that Labour peers in the House of Lords are considering a symbolic vote of no confidence in his leadership. British voters don’t seem any fonder: During the recent European elections, the Labour Party pulled just 14 percent of the vote.

If anyone other than Corbyn had been at the head of the Labour Party, May’s government would probably have fallen long ago. He may yet end up at Downing Street. But the only reason Labour doesn’t already have the keys is the party’s dramatic leftward lurch. In the United States, centrists fear that the Democratic Party is repeating Labour’s mistakes.

The current Democratic presidential hopefuls are generally running to the left, courting activists who argue that the party can beat Trump only by mobilizing the base. Spurned centrists complain that the progressives are guaranteeing four more years of Trump rallies and trade wars. But so far, neither party seems interested in the centrists’ increasingly dire predictions.

Which points to an even deeper parallel between Britain and the United States. Thanks to “first past the post” electoral systems, both nations have two major parties that alternate in power. In both countries, those parties are abandoning the center in favor of their fringes. And radicalism in one side breeds more radicalism in the other, in an increasingly vicious cycle.

Partisans excuse their own radicals on the grounds that, hey, the other side is worse. And they assume that because the other side has moved so far from the center, eventually the center will have to support them instead.

In fairness, one set of partisans has to be right about this. And soon enough, both Britain and America will find out which.

Follow Megan McArdle on Twitter @asymmetricinfo.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

September 23, 2025: The Crackdown
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Marine for Mukilteo mayor; Van Duser for council

The mayor should be elected to a fourth term. A newcomer offers her perspective to the council.

Schwab: We’re seeing who Trump & Co. are; can we go another way?

Trump stated it no more plainly than ‘I hate my opponent.’ Is this the America for which you voted?

Arlington City Council: Logan shows care regarding growth

The City of Arlington Planning Commission and City Council recently approved a… Continue reading

Edmonds, Prop. 1: Vote no on tax increase

Early on in Mike Rosen’s term as Edmonds Mayor he and i… Continue reading

Violence won’t advance cause

An out-of-state friend and I were going over things and later on… Continue reading

Comment: Ignoring, suppressing good data subverts good government

The message sent by recent firings of officials is that data must conform to the agenda, regardless of what it says.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Sept. 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s Tylenol advice worse than the disease

No research proves a risk during pregnancy from acetaminophen. Yet that’s what Dr. Trump ordered.

Everett School Board: Attack ads smear all candidates

Appalling doesn’t even come close to the visceral reactions we had to… Continue reading

Why risk childhood disease outbreaks?

A rainy Sunday in Mukilteo is a good day to catch up… Continue reading

Reduce speeds for more streets in Everett

Regarding Everett’s Vision Zero plan (“Everett unveils draft of Vision Zero plan,”… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.