Military tribunals set bad example

Imagine being on your dream vacation to a foreign country. Now imagine the horror of being in the “wrong place at the wrong time” and you’ve been charged with being a terrorist. To make matters worse, although the country you are visiting prides itself on fair “public” prosecutions and the concept of “innocent until proven guilty,” you will be tried behind closed doors by a military tribunal. Sound scary? Yes. Fair? No. Morally correct? No. Legal? Most definitely not (unless you already live under martial law, which by some accounts we already do).

However, in the United States, in the name of revenge and self defense we seem to be quite willing to say “Hey, these foreigners don’t deserve the same rights that we have, especially after what they’ve done to us” (even though our country was founded by and consists of foreigners).

The rock group Buffalo Springfield once had a hit song called “For What It’s Worth,” containing the quotes “We’d better stop, Hey! What’s that sound … everybody look, what’s going down” and “it starts when you’re always afraid, then you step out of line and the men come and take you away.” I think those lyrics are quite appropriate in this day and age, when it seems that the press is quite willing to espouse government propaganda designed to continue eroding our hard-earnedrights. These rights are not granted by the government. They were reserved by the people. Remember that.

In my humble opinion, we should “do unto others …” By this I mean that if our citizens want to be treated with common courtesy and respect when visiting other countries, and do not want to be faced with the proposition of being prosecuted behind closed doors by military tribunals, perhaps we should set the example.

Snohomish

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau logo is seen through a window at the CFPB offices in Washington on Sept. 23, 2019. Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Ting Shen/The New York Times)
Editorial: Keep medical debt off credit score reporting

The federal CFPB is challenging a state law that bars medical debt from credit bureaus’ consideration.

Schwab: Release the files? Sure; Trump has nothing to hide.

The man’s an open book. And scandals that would destroy others’ political lives are a MAGA selling point.

Few seem to understand property taxes, Port of Everett included

Regarding the Nov. 13 front-page article about the Port of Everett’s 2026… Continue reading

Protect access and conservation of our public lands

I am one of millions of Americans who love our nation’s public… Continue reading

Won’t somone explain tariffs to Trump?

To borrow from the caption for The Herald Editorial Board’s Nov. 15… Continue reading

No Kings rally: Kids say darndest things

At Snohomish’s very large and very peaceful No Kings rally there was… Continue reading

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s $2,000 tariff rebates are a shell game

Most Americans have already paid $1,800 in price increases from the tariffs. It’s another distraction.

Comment: If Trump cares about affordability, he must show it

It will take more than reducing tariffs on a few items; he must show he understands consumers’ pain.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.