New runway won’t lead to larger craft

I have seen the plans for the proposed runway upgrade at Harvey Field and believe that it will provide welcome improvements for flight training, air taxi and recreational aviation. The proposed runway deletes the displaced thresholds of the existing runway and is slightly farther west. The new runway will provide 2,500 feet for takeoff or landing compared to the present 2,600 feet for takeoff and 1,900 feet for landing. Although the takeoff distance available will be slightly less, obstruction clearances during initial climb-out and compliance with noise-abatement procedures will be greater.

Landing operations will be easier and safer for all aircraft at Harvey due to the extra runway length.

The new runway is not likely to lead to a significant change in the character of the aircraft using Harvey. The critical operating regime for “larger” aircraft (multi-engine and/or jet-powered) is takeoff and initial climb-out. Since the proposed runway effective take-off length is slightly less than before, it is highly unlikely that Harvey will become attractive to these larger (and presumably noisier) aircraft.

I have been an pilot, flight instructor, aircraft mechanic and aeronautical engineer for over 63 years (18,350 flight hours). I have also been an FAA designated pilot examiner for 14 years. I have always been proud to be a part of the aviation community because of the great value it places on honesty, integrity and consideration for others. These qualities, which are desirable in any community, are absolutely required of everyone who flies or is in any way associated with flight – survival demands it.

I have known the Harvey family for over 32 years – they are members in good standing of the aforementioned aviation community and are good neighbors. I speak from experience and I fully support their efforts to make the airport better for all.

ARNOLD E. EBNETER

Woodinville

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Getty Images
Editorial: Lawmakers should outline fairness of millionaires tax

How the revenue will be used, in part to make state taxes less regressive, is key to its acceptance.

Comment: Federal bankers deserve an F on climate threat

In dismissing the financial threat from the climate crisis, Fed bankers set the nation up for failure.

Comment: The federal agency brain drain will have dire effects

More than 10,000 workers with STEM doctorates are gone. Who will solve crises and innovate for America?

Ask lawmakers to reject bill to bar removal from tent encampments

Proposed Washington House Bill 2489, per media, is “the Shelters Not Penalties… Continue reading

Heritage Foundation to blame for Trump’s return

Do you recall the day when you lost faith in our democratic… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s election manuevers about more than ego-boosting

The president likely has designs on manipulating the midterms by casting doubt on results.

A horse near transmission lines in Houston, Sept. 20, 2023. Texas has grown to be the second-largest solar power producer in the country. (Annie Mulligan / The New York Times)
Comment: Two energy roads, different futures for world’s climate

The paths for fossil fuels and renewables are set, with countries choosing diverging road maps.

The Buzz: In celebration of bunnies, from Bugs to Bad

We can’t help but see some characteristics shared between Elmer Fudd and Donald Trump.

Comment: Revolutionary War fought by ordinary men and women

Early battles, such as at Moore’s Creek Bridge, and won by volunteer loyalists inspired others to join the fight.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.