North Marina: A little higher, but a lot better

Few vistas rival the one from the bluff above the Port of Everett Marina. The bustling activity of a working waterfront and a Navy base, set against the backdrop of Port Gardner Bay and the Olympic Mountains, offer a spectacular view.

So it’s understandable that owners of homes that overlook the marina are concerned about the height of buildings on the waterfront. Several residents of the bluff above the marina have expressed worries about – and opposition to – a request by the port to raise the maximum height of some condominium buildings at its North Marina redevelopment from 55 to 70 feet. How much of their valuable view would be obscured by such a change, they wonder.

Thanks to computer technology, we have an answer: next to none.

Maritime Trust Co., the project developer, has put together a presentation to share with neighbors and city leaders that combines photos taken from various spots along the bluff with computer drawings that compare what the development would look like with height limits of 55 feet and 70 feet. You have to look closely to see any difference. The port commission has delayed a decision on the change so neighbors can see the presentation.

In return for this marginal change, bluff residents will look down on a much more visually pleasing neighborhood, because the change in heights will allow most parking to go underground. Rather than cars and blacktop, folks on the west side of Grand Avenue will look down on a waterfront neighborhood with walking and biking paths, grassy courtyards and well-planned view corridors.

Some neighbors argue that the proposed change breaks faith with a public process that produced the original 55-foot height limit. Since that accord between the port and the City of Everett was reached in 2003, however, it was discovered that the water table below the development is too high in places to allow much construction underground. To make room for below-surface parking, while ensuring enough condo space for a profitable development, some buildings need to go a bit higher.

Up to 660 upscale condo units, along with restaurants, shops, office space and a boat-repair yard, are planned. The 70-foot limit, which would apply to only a few buildings near the center of the project, would leave room for maximum public access. A wide promenade would encircle the development and a public amphitheater would sit at the open, waterfront end of 13th Street. Attractive plazas and courtyards between buildings are also part of the plan.

It’s a development that’s far more likely to raise the value of neighboring homes than undermine them. And it’ll be infinitely more attractive than the industrial sites it will replace.

The Port Commission and city Planning Commission must weigh in on the height change, with the City Council having the final say. All should approve it, making this the best development it can be for everyone – including its neighbors.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A state Climate Commmitment Act map shows projects funded by the act's carbon auctions.
Editorial: Climate Commitment Act a two-fer for Washington

Its emissions auctions put price on carbon and use that revenue for climate investments.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Dec. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: State funding cuts would devastate long-term care

The Legislature should at least maintain Medicaid funding for nursing facilities at current levels.

Comment: No trust due an administration that ended river pact

The White House killed a negotiated deal to save salmon. The rivers’ protectors must return to court.

Comment: $20-an-hour pay for fast food workers will kill jobs

To protect employment, other states should avoid adopting California’s 2024 wage law.

Charles Adkins
Forum: To make investments we need, wealthy can pay fair share

As state lawmakers consider budgets, they should reconsider proposals for more progressive taxes.

Water from the Snohomish River surrounds a residence along the west side of Lowell Snohomish River Road on Thursday, Dec. 11, 2025 in Snohomish, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Keep eye on weather and on FEMA’s future

Recent flooding should give pause to those who believe federal disaster aid is unnecessary.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Dec. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: What best fits a diagnosis of derangement?

Could it be vile attacks on the victims of tragedy? Vilification of immigrants? Economic denial?

Saunders: A plus for Trump 2.0: Far less firing among his staff

Turnover in the White House in his second term is far lower than his first. The stability is welcome.

Comment: A busy year for Trump, with far more lows than highs

A ceasefire holds in Gaza, and the southern border is quiet, but the economy is not ‘A-plus-plus-plus-plus.’

Comment: Oregon senator has plan to make Senate work better

Sen. Jeff Merkey doesn’t want to end the filibuster; he just wants to return it to its ‘Mr. Smith’ roots.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.