North Marina: A little higher, but a lot better

Few vistas rival the one from the bluff above the Port of Everett Marina. The bustling activity of a working waterfront and a Navy base, set against the backdrop of Port Gardner Bay and the Olympic Mountains, offer a spectacular view.

So it’s understandable that owners of homes that overlook the marina are concerned about the height of buildings on the waterfront. Several residents of the bluff above the marina have expressed worries about – and opposition to – a request by the port to raise the maximum height of some condominium buildings at its North Marina redevelopment from 55 to 70 feet. How much of their valuable view would be obscured by such a change, they wonder.

Thanks to computer technology, we have an answer: next to none.

Maritime Trust Co., the project developer, has put together a presentation to share with neighbors and city leaders that combines photos taken from various spots along the bluff with computer drawings that compare what the development would look like with height limits of 55 feet and 70 feet. You have to look closely to see any difference. The port commission has delayed a decision on the change so neighbors can see the presentation.

In return for this marginal change, bluff residents will look down on a much more visually pleasing neighborhood, because the change in heights will allow most parking to go underground. Rather than cars and blacktop, folks on the west side of Grand Avenue will look down on a waterfront neighborhood with walking and biking paths, grassy courtyards and well-planned view corridors.

Some neighbors argue that the proposed change breaks faith with a public process that produced the original 55-foot height limit. Since that accord between the port and the City of Everett was reached in 2003, however, it was discovered that the water table below the development is too high in places to allow much construction underground. To make room for below-surface parking, while ensuring enough condo space for a profitable development, some buildings need to go a bit higher.

Up to 660 upscale condo units, along with restaurants, shops, office space and a boat-repair yard, are planned. The 70-foot limit, which would apply to only a few buildings near the center of the project, would leave room for maximum public access. A wide promenade would encircle the development and a public amphitheater would sit at the open, waterfront end of 13th Street. Attractive plazas and courtyards between buildings are also part of the plan.

It’s a development that’s far more likely to raise the value of neighboring homes than undermine them. And it’ll be infinitely more attractive than the industrial sites it will replace.

The Port Commission and city Planning Commission must weigh in on the height change, with the City Council having the final say. All should approve it, making this the best development it can be for everyone – including its neighbors.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Using discourse to get to common ground

A Building Bridges panel discussion heard from lawmakers and students on disagreeing agreeably.

Schwab: Taking pride in our own independence from tyranny

Many of us are Americans by luck of birth here; real pride requires commitment to democratic values.

Comment: Supreme Court removes another presidential guardrail

It’s ruling invalidating nationwide injunctions will require more lawsuits to afford general protections.

Why have intelligence services if Trump already knows?

Why on earth any intelligent person would squander their credibility as Donald… Continue reading

Can Democrats be taken seriously?

Same question, different answer: Ask a Republican have they witnessed the decline… Continue reading

Why can’t moderates appeal to voters?

I see a democratic socialist may possibly be the next mayor of… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Oppose passage of ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ in Congress

The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” threatens half of America’s children. (“Medicaid cuts… Continue reading

Stand up to oppose cuts to Medicaid and more

I am a senior citizen, having believed for the years of my… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.