Obama’s lowest priority: some deportation cases

President Barack Obama is in a pickle. Immigration enforcement actually is working — or at least it was working.

Under the Obama administration, the government has removed almost 400,000 illegal immigrants annually. That’s 4 percent of the 10 million illegal immigrants estimated to be living in America — and it sends a warning to those thinking of illegally entering the United States.

Thanks to the Secure Communities program, which requires local law enforcement to share arrestees’ fingerprints with Washington, about half of those deported have criminal records. According to the administration, the vast majority of the rest either recrossed the border after deportation or were recently caught.

So what did the White House announce last week? On Thursday, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Munoz blogged that the Department of Homeland Security will review its entire deportation caseload — that’s 300,000 cases — to “clear out low-priority” cases and “make more room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk.”

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., told The New York Times that the policy would protect youths with clean criminal records whose parents brought them into the country when they were minors. That is, he likened the Obama policy to his proposed legislation, the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors, or DREAM, Act.

Actually, the Obama policy goes much further than shielding minors. Under the guise of “prosecutorial discretion,” a Department of Homeland Security memo advises officials to consider a number of “positive factors” before prosecuting offenders. “Positive factors” include military service, “long-time lawful permanent” residency and being a minor, elderly, disabled or a woman who is pregnant or nursing.

On the one hand, the policy seems smart; let the government concentrate on deporting threats to public safety.

On the other hand, the White House essentially has announced that individuals who break federal immigration law are a “low priority” and unlikely to face legal consequences. So much for deterrence.

Worse, the new policy will allow individuals who have been caught up in a Secure Communities review to apply for work permits. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the pro-enforcement Center for Immigration Studies, said that the new policy makes getting arrested equivalent to winning the lottery: “Their fellow illegal aliens who were not arrested don’t get work authorization.”

Krikorian calls the new policy “administrative amnesty.” Obama failed to persuade Congress to change the law. Now, with the 2012 presidential election looming, he changed policies implemented in the Clinton and George W. Bush years by fiat.

Bush’s Secure Communities program enabled Obama to boast that his administration delivered the greatest number of illegal immigrant removals ever — 395,165 — in fiscal 2009. In 2010, the number fell. Last month, he told the National Council of La Raza, “Here’s the only thing you should know. The Democrats and your president are with you.”

Re-election, after all, is his highest priority.

Debra J. Saunders is a San Francisco Chronicle columnist. Her email address is dsaunders@sfchronicle.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, June 5

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

Comment: Republicans’ tax bill is generational theft

The focus has been on cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, but even greater harm awaits those yet to be born.

More support needed to keep care programs running

I just don’t understand the closing of an adult day health center… Continue reading

How are cuts by Trump and RFK Jr. making us healthy?

Once I recovered from the shock of a second Donald Trump term,… Continue reading

Welch’s criticism of Democrats unpersuasive

Todd Welch’s May 28 Herald commentary criticizing Gov. Bob Ferguson’s signing of… Continue reading

Comment: MAHA report’s faked research just start of problems

RFK Jr. has the notion of research backward, forcing it to fit the conspiracies he’s always believed.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, June 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: A parade for Army? Sure; but let a sibling march, too

The U.S. Merchant Marine has supplied the country’s fighting forces since the Revolutionary War.

Harrop: This isn’t the outcome that Musk likely imagined

After handing over $250 million to elect Trump, he got the job of taking heat for unpopular cuts.

Dowd: Musk moved fast and broke his own reputation

The head of the failed-DOGE experiment leaves Washington with a black eye and less respect.

Comment: GOP’s fiscal hawks get it; voters don’t care about debt

On a basic level they say they do, but they’re more concerned over inflation and cuts to their services.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.