Opposition to Edmonds housing plan isn’t backlash but concern

When a mayor and housing strategy advocates with connections to developers, the real estate industry, and special interests are making decisions and pushing for massive redevelopment in Edmonds, there is a problem. As the real stakeholders, the citizens of Edmonds must be the ones that make the decision about what the city will look like in the future.

This is not a “backlash” as the Herald stated in its coverage (“Backlash stalls Edmonds housing strategy,” The Herald, Feb. 14), but simply citizens demanding a voice at the table to plan for growth in a way that is reasonable, organic and responsible. While the concerned citizens are passionate and vocal at times, it may be out of frustration at the cronyism in Edmonds government. The same connected and like-minded applicants are appointed and reappointed to city commissions and boards.

Edmonds’ mayor has stated that the city will need to accommodate an influx of 5,000 people. What the mayor and the housing strategy proponents have been gleefully advocating goes way beyond that. It is their desire to see Edmonds remade according to their own vision which means Edmonds will be extensively redeveloped in every neighborhood. There is a groundswell of citizens who are letting them know that this is not what the citizens want. This is not a desire to “build a moat around Edmonds,” but responsible stewardship of our community.

The predicted growth can be accommodated in the Highway 99 corridor that has been zoned for multiple family housing and where there is nearby transportation and services. That, along with the new Westgate project will meet the needs of population growth and affordable housing.

Lynne Chelius


Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Jan. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

With long-term care insurance, It's important to look at how the benefits are structured. (Dreamstime/TNS)
Editorial: Fix WA Cares and let it resume its important work

The long-term care program needs modest changes to fairly provide a valuable benefit to seniors.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris stand together at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial as they arrive to attend an event marking the 10th anniversary of the dedication of memorial in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 21, 2021. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Viewpoints: Invoking King’s legacy without exhausting it

Where others ignore the context of King’s words, Biden spoke to the core of the civil rights leader’s legacy.

Comment: Honor King by passing voting rights legislation

Two bills in the U.S. Senate that would secure access to the vote would honor Martin Luther King Jr.

Comment: North Sound families need aid after flooding, cold

Generous donors have stepped forward, but more help and better coordination are needed to recover.

PUD’s practice of averaging usage hit me with huge bill

My spouse and I are living in a modest three-bedroom, 1,800-square-foot single-story… Continue reading

MPHS Tomahawk mascot meant to honor Tulalip people

In recent articles on the topic of retaining the Marysville Pilchuck High… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Jan. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - Elementary school teacher Carrie Landheer protests for stronger COVID-19 safety protocols outside Oakland Unified School District headquarters on Jan. 7, 2022, in Oakland, Calif. Officials across the U.S. are again weighing how and whether to impose mask mandates as COVID-19 infections soar and the American public grows weary of pandemic-related restrictions. Much of the debate centers around the nation’s schools, some of which closed due to infection-related staffing issues. (AP Photo/Noah Berger, File)
Editorial: Keep guard up against covid’s omicron variant

As much as half of the county could be infected by the variant; and hospitalizations are surging.

Most Read