Overblown modesty could get us blown out of the sky

  • Froma Harrop / Providence Journal Columnist
  • Wednesday, December 1, 2004 9:00pm
  • Opinion

Feminine modesty is supposedly under attack at the nation’s airports. We speak of the new “pat-down” procedure at security checkpoints. Some women charge that having security personnel feel around for explosives violates their person. They have lawyers on the case.

I have a solution. Let those who don’t want the pat-down fly together on their own planes – if they can find a pilot. Let everyone else travel with passengers who have been fully scrutinized. I know which flights I would choose: the ones for which they touch, X-ray and hang us upside down in search of bombs.

Actress Patti LuPone has raised a high-profile fuss over the pat-down. She says a screener at the Fort Lauderdale Airport demanded she strip down to her camisole. LuPone says she asked why this was being done, and the screener responded, “We don’t want another Russia to happen.”

Avoiding another “Russia” would seem a fine reason. Last summer, terrorists blew up two Russian airliners. Investigators believe that Chechen women had boarded the planes with non-metallic explosives hidden under their clothes. Shortly after the tragedy, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration issued new rules requiring more intense searches of passengers. Now, about 15 percent of air travelers are chosen for closer inspection, which may include the pat-down.

LuPone could have just braced herself and let the screening be done. A camisole is traditionally an undergarment worn under a sheer blouse, but current fashion permits it to serve as the top itself. One would not expect a trouper like LuPone to be so shy – especially since she appeared topless in the movie “Summer of Sam.” But the actress protested much and was kept off her flight.

Let’s put this in perspective. American soldiers are sacrificing their lives to fight terrorism, so giving up a little dignity in an airport pat-down should seem a minor imposition by comparison. And there are rules to make it as inoffensive as possible. Security workers are supposed to use only the backs of their hands when touching sensitive body parts. Female passengers usually get female screeners. And when a woman screener is not around, the passenger has the option of waiting for one.

There are women – and men, too – who are always looking for things to get in a huff over. Being touched by security personnel would seem a ready-made grievance. Some women charge that others “gawked” at them as they went through the pat-down. You have to wonder about that. Few experiences are less sexually charged than airport security. And the other passengers – themselves hopping around in their stocking feet – would hardly find time to stare at anyone.

But some people cannot be consoled. Rhonda Gaynier, a New York real-estate lawyer, says a pat-down before a flight to Florida – she called it a “breast exam” – had her “almost in tears.” “I’ve never been so humiliated in my life,” the 46-year-old told the New York Post. Real-estate lawyers in New York are not famous for their sensitivity, but Gaynier was so upset by her alleged mistreatment that she wants to sue. She has retained civil rights lawyer Norman Siegel, who is considering a class action.

Of course, this is a big country. Two million passengers go through its commercial airports every day. We can be sure that some screener somewhere is going to “cop a feel.” That individual should be dealt with harshly. But the risk of encountering such a villain seems a fair exchange for not getting blown up midair.

Some critics of the pat-down say, OK, but why put elderly women with canes through this embarrassment? The reason is simple: The day terrorists think we’re not checking Grandma is the day they’ll try to conceal explosives on an older woman – and she may not even know about it.

Again, back to my remedy. Put LuPone, Gaynier, Siegel and anyone who refuses to be closely searched on the same “special” planes. If the woman in seat 36B has plastic explosives strapped under her cashmere, then that will be their problem. Everyone else who submits to the indignities of toughened airport security can gather on their own flights. They will feel safe in the skies and live to endure another pat-down.

Froma Harrop is a Providence Journal columnist. Contact her by writing to fharrop@projo.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Mata, Leutwyler for Lynnwood council seats

With the city facing a budget crisis, voters will determine who serves on four council seats.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Oct. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

County sheriff has balance right on use of police pursuits

The article by The Herald’s Jenna Millikan regarding police pursuits was well… Continue reading

SNAP’s aid should be restored

Thanks for the articles explaining the cost of the Big, not so… Continue reading

Dowd: The stuff that nightmares are made of; AI takes Hollywood

Actors and others are alarmed by the latest starlet: Tilly Norwood, an AI creation that doesn’t age.

Comment: Why the FBI is preparing a ‘perp walk’ for Comey

With flimsy charges against Comey, the chance to humiliate the former FBI chief may be Trump’s only win.

Comment: Path is slim, very slim, for Democrats to retake Senate

The party’s low chances in the Senate explain why it’s putting much of its effort into winning the House.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), right, arrives to join Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) at a news conference on Capitol Hill after the House passed a stopgap bill to keep federal funding flowing past a Sept. 30 deadline on Friday, Sept. 19, 2025. The House narrowly passed the bill on Friday, but the measure appears dead on arrival in the Senate, where Democrats have vowed to block it. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Democrats point to problem deeper than the shutdown

Two state Democrats say they are holding out to force talks on a looming health care crisis.

Comment: Supreme Court term likely to be a momentous one

After signaling an expansion of Trump’s powers earlier, the court majority could make those official.

Comment: Hegseth gives a masterclass in poor leadership

Focusing on appearance, rather than a changing battlefield, Hegseth fakes it in front of skilled leaders.

Where are the officials who serve constituents?

I was just wondering why while the MAGA type politicians get further… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.