Parties need to pull campaigns out of gutter

If a clear message was being delivered by voters last week, it was that trust in public officials is in short supply.

Voters across the state seemed to scream mistrust at the top of their lungs, rejecting by wide margins a pair of ballot measures approved by the Legislature. At the same time, they approved two initiatives widely opposed by the political establishment.

Curiously, that mistrust didn’t seem to apply to incumbent candidates. Voters re-elected their state and congressional representatives in droves, leaving essentially the same cast of characters to represent them in Olympia and Washington, D.C. So while voters have little faith in their current leaders, they don’t seem to think the opposition offers anything better.

Most distressingly, voter turnout was abysmal. By the time all the absentee ballots are counted, Snohomish County turnout is projected to be barely more than half of registered voters, meaning some 130,000 county citizens with voter cards chose to ignore the process altogether.

The system is broken. Its keepers, our political party leaders, need to fix it.

Near the top of the list of solutions should be pulling the reins on negative campaign ads. We’re not talking about mailings and other ads that point out substantive differences between candidates and their views. Such distinctions form the bedrock of healthy political debate. We mean the "hit pieces" that cynically distort or misstate an opponent’s record, that make below-the-belt personal attacks, or that seek to inflame hatred.

State Rep. Dave Schmidt, who believes he was targeted with this kind of advertising in his successful bid for the 44th District Senate seat this year, plans to introduce a bill next session aimed at reducing the amount of money parties can spend on such pieces. Currently, state and local parties are limited in how much cash they can give to a candidate, but not in how much they can spend on certain mailings on a candidate’s behalf. Schmidt’s idea would have such mailings count against the party’s spending limit. It would be a good start.

But fundamentally, responsible campaign behavior is up to the parties themselves. In doing whatever it takes to win a particular race, they’re making losers of everyone by turning voters off and putting a damper on civic participation. Ruthless hit pieces undermine the public’s trust in both sides, damaging the very process the parties should be advancing. The parties need to take the lead by working together to find ways to keep campaigns out of the gutter.

Political campaigns should be about an honest, thorough exchange of views, not an exercise in character assassination. Until our political parties buy into that notion and act on it, they’ll continue a downward spiral that undermines the essence and effectiveness of our democracy.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Advocates for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities rallied on the state capitol steps on Jan. 17. The group asked for rate increases for support staff and more funding for affordable housing. (Laurel Demkovich/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Support those caring for state’s most vulnerable

Increasing pay for care workers of those with developmental disabilities can save the state money.

Klein: Why Trump’s, GOP’s slim victories don’t feel that way

Trump and the Republicans won on ‘bad vibes’ for Democrats. That will be tough to govern with.

Harrop; Behold Trump’s new coin of the realm

Trump is selling $TRUMP, a cryptocurrency that surged in value at its fortuitously timed release.

Comment: MAGA world’s split is made-for-TV drama

And President Trump, a winner regardless who wins, is here for every moment of it.

Dowd: Trump brings a chill to D.C. that will persist

Yet, Trump was assisted in his second victory by Biden’s hubris and his staff’s secrecy.

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence visit the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington, Jan. 21, 2019. (Sarah Silbiger/The New York Times)
Editorial: What would MLK Jr. do? What, now, will we do?

Monday marks the presidential inauguration and the King holiday, offering guidance on the way forward.

Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial is framed by autumnal colors at the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. (Getty Images)
Comment: Defining King’s ‘beloved community’

The term inspired MLK Jr.’s social justice work and persists for others to continue that work.

Paul: Decline in geriatric care a concern not just for seniors

As the population over 65 grows, we’re losing geriatricians to better-paying fields. Yet, there’s hope.

Comment: Trump’s health picks may pose greatest threat to U.S.

What mixed messages from RFK Jr. and others could affect parents’ attitudes about vaccination.

Eco-nomics: A brief history of how the climate crisis unfolded

A review of the facts and dates makes clear that ramping up fossil fuel use takes us in the wrong direction.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.