Politicians are now ending the era of smart budgets

  • Geneva Overholser / Washington Post columnist
  • Tuesday, October 17, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — The maples on Capitol Hill are turning deep red these days, and visions of electoral sugarplums are dancing in senators’ heads. Which is to say, they’re finishing up the budget, with Nov. 7 very much in mind.

Bill Hoagland disapproves.

Hoagland is staff director for the Senate Budget Committee. In his office, with its stirring view of the Capitol, Hoagland makes the nation’s finances seem almost comprehensible to a visitor: He talks as comfortably about trillions as most of us do about twenties.

But he’s not happy with the process today. "Good policies are made in eras of deficits. If we were still a little bit more constrained, I don’t think we’d be passing some of the legislation we are." Hoagland points to the television screen, where senators are debating one of 13 appropriations bills. The sound is off, but one thing’s for sure: They aren’t making cuts. The lure of additions that could affect votes in a couple of weeks is too strong.

We’re in an era of surpluses, as the presidential candidates keep reminding us, jousting about how to spend them. Hoagland wishes we’d all remember that times change, and quickly.

"We are the front end of the postwar baby boom, and we come in with a vengeance, and these surpluses will turn." He expects the turn in 2013 or so, as Social Security receipts no longer equal payouts.

As Hoagland speaks, the senators are busily spending hundreds of millions on nice projects back home, along with extra money for "everything from the Internal Revenue Service to public housing," as one news report put it the next day. The spending bills are growing well beyond the caps Congress imposed on itself. Meanwhile, the government is operating on continuing resolutions, because Congress — as has become its custom — was far from finished when the fiscal year opened Oct. 1.

Yet there’s nothing this year, Hoagland says gratefully, like the "high-rolling politics" that shut down the government in ‘95. During that tumultuous year, Hoagland went to the White House to meet with Bill Clinton on an arcane aspect of food stamp legislation. He found Clinton "an extremely intelligent man when it comes to policy." The two of them were discussing "something so subtle, and he knew as much about it as I did."

Hoagland normally puts his own prodigious policy knowledge to work for New Mexico’s Pete Domenici, chair of the Senate Budget Committee. This explains why strings of chili peppers are hanging in the office of an Indiana farm boy. But Hoagland is a man shaped by thoughts fiscal rather than ideological.

He says he jested with a group of senators that it was fine, passing all this legislation that will be cutting into the surplus for years to come. But, effective Nov. 7, "We ought to have a law that says, all legislation in Congress enacted during the last 25 days is repealed."

In reality, though, Hoagland’s job is to keep the process going as the senators want it. Tacked onto the last spending measure will be language permitting them to exceed the caps — language prepared by staffers like Hoagland: "We help ‘em out of their fixes."

Asked what he thinks of the public’s views of the budget, Hoagland sees confusion. "The American public believes we spend a lot more on foreign aid than we do," and underestimates spending on the elderly. "The ratio of spending for the elderly vs. children is almost 10 to one, and it’s going to get worse." Also, people overstate the percentage going to the poor. "In fact, we’re spending money on middle-income elderly retired people, and they’re not necessarily without assets."

As it happens, an organization here called the Center on Policy Attitudes last month surveyed the public to see how it would spend the federal monies. After looking at actual expenditures, respondents would cut defense an average 24 percent. They would raise federal support for education by 45 percent, for job training by 128 percent, and for medical research by 147 percent. And the highest percentage increase — 218 percent — would go to the United Nations and U.N. peacekeeping.

On the surplus, respondents said 71 percent should go to shore up Social Security and Medicare and pay down the debt. Only 18 percent wanted tax relief and 11 percent, new spending.

On the surplus — and thus on the wisdom of prudence in flush times — the public is with you, Bill Hoagland. Even if the politicians are not.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The vessel Tonga Chief, a 10-year-old Singaporean container ship, is moored at the Port of Everett Seaport in November, 2023, in Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Leave port tax issue for campaign, not the ballot

Including “taxing district” on ballot issue to expand the Port of Everett’s boundaries is prejudicial.

Snohomish County Councilmembers Nate Nehring, left, and Jared Mead, speaking, take turns moderating a panel including Tulip Tribes Chairwoman Teri Gobin, Stanwood Mayor Sid Roberts and Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell during the Building Bridges Summit on Monday, Dec. 4, 2023, at Western Washington University Everett in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Candidates, voters have campaign promises to make

Two county officials’ efforts to improve political discourse skills are expanding to youths and adults.

Ross Douthat: This trial isn’t going to cost Trump many voters

To most observers, a conviction will seem either a minor offense or an overreach of prosecution.

Kristof: Israel can abandon hope if it invades Rafah

Further deaths of civilians to get at Hamas is likely to create a new generation of Palestinian fighters.

Krugman: Trump only Exhibit A for the pettiness of the powerful

When wealth no longer satisfies, the powerful elite look for adulation, to the disadvantage of all others.

Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Charles Blow: Trump remains at war with the U.S. Constitution

His threats of deportation and violence against peaceful protesters, though vague, can’t be ignored.

Choice in November is between democracy, autocracy

The country belongs to the people and in November they can choose… Continue reading

Opposing Israel’s Netanyahu isn’t antisemitic

I support the demonstrations against Israel’s Benjamin Netayahu. Counter to what the… Continue reading

Trump is being pursued in court because he can win

It is so obvious that President Biden, the Democrats and much of… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.