Politicians are now ending the era of smart budgets

  • Geneva Overholser / Washington Post columnist
  • Tuesday, October 17, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — The maples on Capitol Hill are turning deep red these days, and visions of electoral sugarplums are dancing in senators’ heads. Which is to say, they’re finishing up the budget, with Nov. 7 very much in mind.

Bill Hoagland disapproves.

Hoagland is staff director for the Senate Budget Committee. In his office, with its stirring view of the Capitol, Hoagland makes the nation’s finances seem almost comprehensible to a visitor: He talks as comfortably about trillions as most of us do about twenties.

But he’s not happy with the process today. "Good policies are made in eras of deficits. If we were still a little bit more constrained, I don’t think we’d be passing some of the legislation we are." Hoagland points to the television screen, where senators are debating one of 13 appropriations bills. The sound is off, but one thing’s for sure: They aren’t making cuts. The lure of additions that could affect votes in a couple of weeks is too strong.

We’re in an era of surpluses, as the presidential candidates keep reminding us, jousting about how to spend them. Hoagland wishes we’d all remember that times change, and quickly.

"We are the front end of the postwar baby boom, and we come in with a vengeance, and these surpluses will turn." He expects the turn in 2013 or so, as Social Security receipts no longer equal payouts.

As Hoagland speaks, the senators are busily spending hundreds of millions on nice projects back home, along with extra money for "everything from the Internal Revenue Service to public housing," as one news report put it the next day. The spending bills are growing well beyond the caps Congress imposed on itself. Meanwhile, the government is operating on continuing resolutions, because Congress — as has become its custom — was far from finished when the fiscal year opened Oct. 1.

Yet there’s nothing this year, Hoagland says gratefully, like the "high-rolling politics" that shut down the government in ‘95. During that tumultuous year, Hoagland went to the White House to meet with Bill Clinton on an arcane aspect of food stamp legislation. He found Clinton "an extremely intelligent man when it comes to policy." The two of them were discussing "something so subtle, and he knew as much about it as I did."

Hoagland normally puts his own prodigious policy knowledge to work for New Mexico’s Pete Domenici, chair of the Senate Budget Committee. This explains why strings of chili peppers are hanging in the office of an Indiana farm boy. But Hoagland is a man shaped by thoughts fiscal rather than ideological.

He says he jested with a group of senators that it was fine, passing all this legislation that will be cutting into the surplus for years to come. But, effective Nov. 7, "We ought to have a law that says, all legislation in Congress enacted during the last 25 days is repealed."

In reality, though, Hoagland’s job is to keep the process going as the senators want it. Tacked onto the last spending measure will be language permitting them to exceed the caps — language prepared by staffers like Hoagland: "We help ‘em out of their fixes."

Asked what he thinks of the public’s views of the budget, Hoagland sees confusion. "The American public believes we spend a lot more on foreign aid than we do," and underestimates spending on the elderly. "The ratio of spending for the elderly vs. children is almost 10 to one, and it’s going to get worse." Also, people overstate the percentage going to the poor. "In fact, we’re spending money on middle-income elderly retired people, and they’re not necessarily without assets."

As it happens, an organization here called the Center on Policy Attitudes last month surveyed the public to see how it would spend the federal monies. After looking at actual expenditures, respondents would cut defense an average 24 percent. They would raise federal support for education by 45 percent, for job training by 128 percent, and for medical research by 147 percent. And the highest percentage increase — 218 percent — would go to the United Nations and U.N. peacekeeping.

On the surplus, respondents said 71 percent should go to shore up Social Security and Medicare and pay down the debt. Only 18 percent wanted tax relief and 11 percent, new spending.

On the surplus — and thus on the wisdom of prudence in flush times — the public is with you, Bill Hoagland. Even if the politicians are not.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Don’t pamper young criminals with lenient sentences

I want to give a shout out to Todd Welch for his… Continue reading

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.