Port broke agreement over crane’s color, not Bargreens

I have seen this happen over and over. A large business or government agency reaches an agreement with a community or neighborhood group which includes provisions or mitigation to a planned project. Once the project is approved, those provisions (or some of them) are ignored, and the citizens are essentially told, “So sue me.”

As I understand it, Port of Everett signed a legal agreement with neighbors promising a specific color on their new cranes, then did not fulfill that agreement (“Everett coffee heirs get $590K over crane color, ending saga,” The Herald, Dec. 6). In this case, there was someone who had the resources to push back on the Port for not upholding their part of the bargain.

Instead of vilifying the Bargreens, outrage should be directed at the Port for thumbing their nose at their legal agreement. It was the Port’s act of breaking that legal agreement that cost the taxpayers. Had they kept their word, Bargreens would have had no case.

Theresa Gemmer

Everett

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Joel Kohlstedt
Joel Kohlstedt: Covid couldn’t stop vital learning partnership

Waste Management’s program for waste reduction and recycling lessons took to Zoom in county schools.

Juan Paralez: Our leaders must confront domestic terrorism

Leaders at federal and state levels must take seriously the threat we face from domestic extremists.

Boeing workers walk outside of Boeing's Everett assembly plant on Tuesday, April 21, 2020 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Counting the costs of Boeing-Airbus trade battles

Government subsidies and the tariffs that resulted hurt trade and allowed a competitor to rise.

Scenes from Everett High School graduation at Angel of the Winds Arena on Saturday, June 15, 2018 in Everett, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Investment in foster youths offers path to diploma

Treehouse’s Graduation Success hopes to help more foster youths to continue to college and careers.

The Temple of Justice is shown Thursday, April 23, 2020, at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash., as Washington state Supreme Court justices hear oral arguments inside — but using remote video technology — in a case that addresses the safety of prison inmates during the coronavirus outbreak. Justices used remote video technology to conduct the court business and distance themselves from each other while broadcasting the arguments to viewers. During the hearing, lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and crime victims held a news conference to protest the release of some offenders. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Courts, lawmakers shouldn’t make call on who’s media

Denying public records to a YouTube channel could risk the people’s access to what belongs to them.

Enjoying painted rocks’ positive words during walks

During the past year, I have walked many miles on the sidewalks… Continue reading

Comment: How and why to talk to your kids about Juneteenth

The new holiday offers an opportunity to talk about racism with children and how they can confront it.

Harrop: China’s dominance in chips, batteries should worry us

President Biden is right to call for ‘extreme competition’ to counter China’s technology maneuvers.

Most Read