Port, city working on the application

A lot has been said about establishing a quiet zone in Mukilteo – some of it incorrect. To set the record straight, I have highlighted some of the agreements and milestones that were necessary to create a quiet zone.

* December 2004: Port of Everett and Citizens for a Quality Mukilteo signed an agreement as mitigation for the Rail/Barge Transfer Facility to pay up to $600,000 for the implementation of a quiet zone in Mukilteo, subject to the issuance of permits.

* August 2005: The port received permits to start the first phase of construction on the Rail/Barge Transfer Facility.

* May 2006: The port and the city of Mukilteo signed an interlocal agreement to implement a quiet zone. This agreement called for the city to make an application and the port to fund up to a maximum of $600,000 for the application, design and implementation of the quiet zone.

* August 2006: The Federal Railroad Administration amended its regulations relating to the implementation of quiet zones, setting forth the current criteria necessary to apply for a quiet zone designation.

* August 2006: After the quiet zone rules were amended, the port sought the services of HDR, an engineering firm experienced in rail work, to identify quiet zone options and costs.

* Oct. 10, 2006: With the HDR study complete, the report was presented to the Port Commission, which in turn directed staff to turn the study over to Mukilteo, for selection of an alternative.

* Jan. 31, 2007: The Mukilteo City Council approved the four-quadrant gate alternative at the Mount Baker Crossing.

Right now, the port, in cooperation with city staff, is gathering materials to prepare the application for a quiet zone designation. We continue to work together with the goal of finding a design at a cost that can be supported by all parties, including the citizenry of Mukilteo.

John M. Mohr

Executive Director

Port of Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Oppose passage of ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ in Congress

The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” threatens half of America’s children. (“Medicaid cuts… Continue reading

Stand up to oppose cuts to Medicaid and more

I am a senior citizen, having believed for the years of my… Continue reading

Skip the private fireworks displays, please

As everyone knows, our great country’s birthday, The Fourth of July, is… Continue reading

Comment: ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will be hard sell to public

Republicans now must explain its cuts to health coverage, SNAP and clean energy credits and additional debt.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump obliterates any sense of reliance on facts, truth

Any attempt to set the record straight is met with charges of having a lack of respect and patriotism.

Saunders: Price to pay for GOP senators who defy the president

Trump wants his Bill Beautiful Bill passed; and soon. Republicans’ future may hinge on it.

Comment: GOP’s Big Beautiful Bill extreme on immigration, too

Currently, $18,000 is spent for every undocumented immigrant. The bill increases that five-fold.

Comment: Term limits in Congress would only make it weaker

Limiting terms would result in a younger Congress, but would transfer power to lobbyists and staffers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.