Reform doesn’t meet needs

I applaud Evalina Martin’s Oct. 27 letter to the editor on the state welfare system (“State welfare system: Punishes working parents”). Her story is shared by the rising single household homes with young children. Simply stated, the welfare reform program created haphazard programs that lagged behind with its primary goals.

The welfare reform failed to address the short term, imminent needs for single working women and their children. I have a hard time conceptualizing that it would take a wage-earner $12 an hour at a full time job in order to survive – and that figure is based on research done two years ago. As it stands, subsistence by these families remains unremarkable as they continue to struggle with today’s economic demands.

It’s common knowledge that women earn less than their male counterparts. Low-income women’s wage potential is further exacerbated by lack of skills, training and education. It’s difficult to conceptualize the rationale behind Clinton’s 2001 budget proposal to raise the minimum wage by $1 (for a two-year period). This is tantamount to bottom-scraping resources.

The forecast calls for a continuous rise in child care costs and there appears to be no immediate alternatives, despite the state’s minimal subsidized payment contribution to child care providers.

If the intent here is to lift these single women above the poverty line and at the same time increase quality parent-child time and relationships, then the goal was obviously missed or grossly misidentified with its implementation.

What is needed are more innovative, practical programs tailored to provide higher educational opportunities and vocational training to meet today’s modern, technological society. The state must think long and hard before allocating money to other programs. Longer term, quality child care and financial aid are necessary so that the single mothers can lift themselves out of poverty and give their children a head start in building their future.

Irena Fajardo

Everett

Talk to us

More in Opinion

File - A teenager holds her phone as she sits for a portrait near her home in Illinois, on Friday, March 24, 2023. The U.S. Surgeon General is warning there is not enough evidence to show that social media is safe for young people — and is calling on tech companies, parents and caregivers to take "immediate action to protect kids now." (AP Photo Erin Hooley, File)
Editorial: Warning label on social media not enough for kids

The U.S. surgeon general has outlined tasks for parents, officials and social media companies.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Forum: Especially at time of peace, U.S. must honor its fallen

As diplomacy takes precedence over military action, Memorial Day reminds us of our duty to history.

Comment: Federal student loan repayments need reforms

With repayments resuming soon, borrowers and the government need to prepare income-based plans.

Comment: Veterans struggling with addiction need our support

Connect veterans with the services they need through encouragement, understanding and advocacy.

President Joe Biden meets with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of Calif., to discuss the debt limit in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, May 22, 2023, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Comment: A brief history of risks and outcomes of debt crises

Past debt ceiling and budget crises in 1995, 2011 and 2013 offer perspective on the current situation.

Comment: Hospice care isn’t giving up; it’s a gift of time, love

End-of-life care offers patients and families comfort, better quality of life and time to say goodbye.

Comment: State, local libraries rebuilding lives after prison

For those leaving prison, a library card is key to starting again. A new program offers that key.

Most Read