Saunders: Press more deferential to Biden on health issues

Biden’s press secretary didn’t have to field the more intrusive questions posed to Trump’s spokeswoman.

By Debra J. Saunders / syndicated columnist

If you have any doubt about whether the White House press corps has a different standard for President Biden than it did for former President Trump, consider the press briefings that followed their first physicals as president at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Biden’s physical occurred Friday.

On reflection, Team Trump was too transparent when then-Press Secretary Sarah Sanders brought Dr. Ronny Jackson, then physician to the president, to the briefing room podium where he answered press questions for nearly an hour in January 2018.

Here’s a sampling of some of the more egregious press questions.

• “Are you confident of his prostate health?”

• “There have been reports that the president has forgotten names, that he is repeating himself. Are you ruling out things like early-onset Alzheimer’s? Are you looking at dementialike symptoms?” (Jackson disclosed that Trump had been given the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test and scored 30 out of 30.)

• “Do you have a life expectancy range for him based on his results?”

• “Did you see any evidence of bone spurs?”; a reference to the cause for Trump’s fifth Vietnam-era draft deferment. (Jackson said the medical team didn’t check for bone spurs.)

• “Did you take a waist measurement for the president?”

• Given Trump’s age, then 71, “Will you give cognitive testing in the future?”

• “Does he take any sleep aids?” (Yes, Ambien occasionally during foreign trips.)

• “How much sleep does he get on average?”

• “Does he watch too much TV?”

• “Do you have any concerns about the president’s use of Twitter?”

• “Is there anyone on the president’s medical team, such as a psychiatrist or psychologist, whose job it is to monitor the president’s emotional state or watch for potential psychiatric problems or indicators of those?” (“That falls upon me,” Jackson responded.)

CNN sent Dr. Sanjay Gupta to the briefing. Gupta challenged Jackson for asserting that Trump’s health was “excellent” for his age, given that Trump was taking cholesterol-lowering medication and Gupta saw evidence of heart disease and borderline obesity. (Jackson credited Trump’s health to “great genes.”)

Not all of the above questions are out of bounds, but the very number of questions about Trump’s mental state was over-the-top. If Sanders’ plan had been to make the press look like a pack of jackals to the GOP base, she succeeded.

Press Secretary Jen Psaki no doubt learned from the Trump experience. She did not usher physician to the president Dr. Kevin O’Connor into the briefing room after Biden’s recent physical.

Instead, Psaki released a six-page letter written by O’Connor after the briefing, which gave her license to avoid answering questions about it.

O’Connor offered that Biden “remains a healthy, vigorous 78-year-old male, who is fit to execute the duties of the Presidency.” (The next day, Biden turned 79.)

O’Connor also wrote that since the last year, Biden experienced more frequent “throat clearing,” probably because of esophageal reflux and allergies, as well as “perceptibly stiffer and less fluid” ambulatory gait.

The timing was fortuitous. Biden’s annual physical, which included a colonoscopy, was held during a packed news day that included the traditional Thanksgiving turkey pardon and House passage of the Build Back Better Act. That meant less time for questions on Biden’s physical; and most of those questions were about the logistics of the exam.

One reporter asked Psaki about a Politico/Morning Consult poll that reported 50 percent of voters surveyed did not agree with the statement that “President Biden is in good health,” and voters are almost evenly split on the question of if he is in “good mental health.” She then asked for Psaki’s take.

Psaki stepped past that question as if it were a bug.

There were no questions about the asthma for which Biden got five draft deferments.

There were no questions that referred to Biden’s two brain surgeries more than two decades ago, no questions about his atrial fibrillation or what O’Connor described as “moderate to severe spondylosis.” There was no question about the “mild sensory peripheral neuropathy of both feet” and whether it might have played a role in Biden fracturing bones in his foot while playing with a family dog a year ago.

Amazingly, there were no direct questions about whether Biden was given a cognitive test or if he had a psychiatric exam. No such tests were mentioned in the O’Connor letter.

Was the kid-glove treatment proof of bias, or did the press corps get played? Try: both.

Debra J. Saunders is a fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Chapman Center for Citizen Leadership. Email her at dsaunders@discovery.org.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: A recap of Herald Editorial Board endorsements

By The Herald Editorial Board Voters, open up your ballots and voters… Continue reading

Schwab: Trump lives the life of a flexible dog, because he can

With a pliant Congress and Court, the president finds every impulse easily bent to his whims.

Comment: A hunger for leadership, compassion as SNAP snaps shut

There’s plenty of blame to go around, most of all for President Trump’s bullying of his opponents.

‘No sit, no lie’ ordinance hasn’t solved anything in Everett

Everett’s “no sit, no lie” buffer zone ordinance was intended to address… Continue reading

Salmon, orca need healthy Columbia, Snake rivers

A recent commentary (“Scuttling Columbia Basin pact ignores peril to salmon,” The… Continue reading

Why are cities seeking more growth and traffic?

The candidates running for office keep telling us we need more growth.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Oct. 31

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump, GOP holding emergency SNAP funds over politics

Even during the shutdown, emergency funds could sustain food aid. It’s just another attack on SNAP.

Comment: Both parties need to work together to end shutdown

With pay halted for many federal workers and services threatened, only cooperation can reopen government.

Comment: Brace for higher health care costs during open enrollment

Federal reductions in subsidies may be joined by drug costs and other inflation for workers’ insurance plans.

Comment: Trump has turned White House into his own golden goose

As he festoons the Oval Office in gold, he’s replacing history with opulence and turning a tidy profit.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.