Saunders: U.S. Iron Dome isn’t feasible now, but it could be

Trump is correct to order a plan for a system that would protect the nation from missile strikes.

By Debra J. Saunders / Las Vegas Review-Journal

“We will build a massive missile defense shield to protect us,” Donald Trump told a crowd at an Arizona campaign rally in October. “And it’s going to be made in the USA, a lot of it right here.”

It was a timely proposal given that in 2023, Americans spent more than a week watching a Chinese spy balloon travel from Asia to Alaska, then Canada, and a swath of states from Montana to South Carolina.

President Joe Biden decided against shooting down the big balloon until it reached the Atlantic Ocean.

America looked weak.

So, a week after taking the Oath of Office, Trump took the first step toward delivering on his missile-defense pledge. He signed an executive order that directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to submit a plan for a “U.S. Iron Dome,” modeled after Israel’s highly successful, U.S.-funded anti-missile defense program, within 60 days.

“The threat of attack by ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, and other advanced aerial attacks, remains the most catastrophic threat facing the United States,” the order read.

Good for Trump for sticking to his word and putting American security first.

“Our homeland has never been less secure, particularly from nation states,” retired Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, now a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told me Monday.

“I’m glad to see this focus,” Montgomery added.

I’m glad to see the resurrection of President Ronald Reagan’s proposed Strategic Defense Initiative, which sought to protect the nation from missile attacks before the close of the Cold War. The usual critics spit out their coffee over the scheme, commonly lampooned at the time as “Star Wars,” but it did serve as a deterrent to Russian and Chinese ambitions, and it is widely credited for ending the Cold War.

Some 40 years later, the rap against Trump’s Iron Dome is not that an anti-missile system could not work here — even if it works for Israel — because America is too big, more than 400 times the size of the Jewish state.

An American Iron Dome simply would cost too much money. If a U.S. adversary were to launch missiles against the United States, Montgomery figured, that adversary might fire 500 to 600 missiles. To stop each one of those missiles, the military would have to shoot one to two missiles, which cost between $70 million and $100 million each.

“Do the math on that,” the admiral continued, “and you’re very quickly in a number that begins with a T, trillions of dollars just on missiles.”

“That’s not realistic in the fiscal environment we’re in.”

That’s where innovation could save the day. Instead of relying solely on hi-tech weaponry, the Pentagon could look at using dirigibles, putting radars in unmanned balloons, Montgomery offered.

So we’re back to balloons.

The heat is on Hegseth to come up with a strong plan that can be implemented at warp speed.

Quoth Montgomery: “If this executive order doesn’t work, we don’t have a fallback plan to stop a conventional strike.”

Contact Las VegasReview-Journal Washington columnist Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@reviewjournal.com. Follow her on X @debrajsaunders. Copright 2025, Creators.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A Sabey Corporation data center in East Wenatchee, Wash., on Nov. 3, 2024. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo/The New York Times)
Editorial: Protect utililty ratepayers as data centers ramp up

State lawmakers should move ahead with guardrails for electricity and water use by the ‘cloud’ and AI.

Bad Bunny on stage during his residency at the Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot in San Juan, Puerto Rico, Aug. 9, 2025. Bad Bunny’s three-month concert series in San Juan is spurring a short-term surge in Puerto Rico’s economy. (Amy Lombard/The New York Times)
Comment: NFL suits up Bad Bunny in long drive for global appeal

President Trump and others don’t like the halftime choice, but the NFL’s bet is that Latinos will.

Comment: Bill can restore hope for incarcerated Native people

Legislation would allow for review of the sentences for some Native Americans held in prison.

Student protests prove kids as the adults in the room

I want to express how proud I am of the thousands of… Continue reading

Welcome new immigrants adjusting to a new culture

I am reminded, in these days of cleaving, we are encouraged to… Continue reading

Has Trump forgotten what’s written on Lady Liberty?

Have Donald Trump and his partners in arms forgotten, overlooked, or interpreted… Continue reading

Comment: Listening to, helping boys and men can help us all

State lawmakers can establish a state Boys and Men Commission to address the challenges they face.

Comment: LifeWise misreads Constitution in suing Everett Schools

Case law allows release time for off-campus religious instruction. Schools don’t have to promote it.

Comment: Without child care support, work stops; it’s simple

Families and employers depend on state child care assistance. Cuts to two programs would harm all.

Forum: Immigration raids involving children cause lasting trauma

The cruelty and terror inherent in raids by federal immigration agents cannot be allowednear children.

Forum: As go our forests, so goes our environmental future

The Trump administration’s move to end the Roadless Rule jeopardizes ancient forests and risks collapse.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.