Saying it ‘failed’ doesn’t make it so

I must admit to a rising level of frustration every time I see another proclamation that the Affordable Care Act has “failed.”

A few observations with regard to this phenomenon. First, the ACA has not really even taken full effect. Is it not unfair to announce something has failed before it has even begun?

But, more importantly, people seem to hold the ACA up against some ideal of perfection that the prior health-care delivery system most definitely did not provide. The ACA is, unfortunately, not a perfect system. But it does offer extreme advantages over the old.

Prior to the ACA, millions of families and individuals had to file for bankruptcy when the primary cause was medical expenses. The vast majority of these people thought they had health insurance! Well, they did. But the quality of their coverage was such that it was essentially worthless when actually put to the test. Under the ACA, there are no caps on expenditures and no pre-existing condition exclusions.

How is this a failure?

How is allowing parents to keep their children covered until age 26 a failure?

How is the provision of routine physicals and screening tests at no cost or co-pays a failure?

How is keeping people out the most expensive setting for health-care delivery, the emergency room, and addressing issues before they become “emergent,” a failure?

How is allowing even 30 year olds to be protected from unexpected illness (as if we always expect such things) or accidents (by definition unexpected), in addition to “chronic” maladies at a reasonable cost a failure?

One trip and fall could easily result in medical bills in six-figures and the diagnosis of a serious medical condition could put you into seven-figures within months or years.

The Affordable Care Act protects those covered under its provisions from economic ruin and denial of care for the rest of their lives. There are millions of people that can attest that this was most definitely not the case prior to the ACA.

Please tell me now, how is this a “failure?”

Steve Guinn

Edmonds

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, May 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Comment: We need housing, habitats and a good buffer between them

The best way to ensure living space for people, fish and animals are science-based regulations.

Comment: Museums allow look at the past to inform our future

The nation’s museums need the support of the public and government to thrive and tell our stories.

Comment: Better support of doula care can cut maternal deaths

Partners need to extend the reach of the state’s Apple Health doula program, before and after births.

Forum: Permit-to-purchase firearm law in state would save lives

Requiring a permit to purchase will help keep guns in responsible hands and reduce suicides and homicides.

Forum: Whether iron or clay, father and son carry that weight

Son’s interest in weight training rekindles father’s memories of a mentor’s high school ‘blacksmith shop.’

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

The Buzz: We have a new pope and Trump shtick that’s getting old

This week’s fashion question: Who wore the papal vestments better; Trump or Pope Leo XIV?

Schwab: Trump isn’t a lawyer, but plays president on TV

Unsure if he has to abide by the Constitution, Trump’s next gig could be prison warden or movie director.

Klein: Trump’s pick of Vance signaled values of his second term

Selecting Vance as his vice president cued all that what mattered now was not just loyalty but sycophancy.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.