Schwab: Rule of law protects us from tyranny; if we follow it

Do Republicans still respect it, see its value? Or was it traded for their guy in the Oval Office?

By Sid Schwab

Herald columnist

It’s time for the Republican Party and its members who continue to support Trump to decide if they believe in America. Seriously. That’s the question, right now, as Trump, Barr and Congressional Republicans are declaring the Constitution of The United States of America inoperative, a meaningless piece of parchment. Is there any Trumpist who can look in the mirror and claim the person smirking back at them would make excuses, were it Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton?

That venerable document explicitly gives to Congress the authority, the duty, to oversee the Executive Branch. In a country founded by people who fled tyrannical monarchy, this is easily understood; a concept to be defended at all costs, lest we find ourselves back in the 17th century, with no way home.

Donald Trump, a duplicitous egoist who’s bullied, cheated and ignored the law throughout his career and who’s demonstrated not an ounce of patriotism beyond that which enriches him, is, without resistance from his party, claiming he’s above the law. He’s demanding his hired help do the same. And he’s getting away with it.

The thing about the rule of law is that, alone, it doesn’t exist. Citizens need to buy into the concept, see it as worth defending, even if doing so might lessen their personal power. Even if it requires sacrificing part of the present to protect all of the future. If it ever did, the Republican Party no longer accepts that premise. We see now how the system fails if people, particularly our elected officials, don’t respect it.

When a “president” refuses to comply with constitutionally mandated congressional oversight requests, when his attorney general unreservedly lies to Congress, while making farcical excuses for Trump’s lawlessness — “It wasn’t obstruction because he considered the investigation unfair.” — how will subpoenas or contempt orders issued by Congress be enforced? Absent belief in the most basic American premises, namely separation of powers, and checks and balances; absent willingness to accede to its requirements, it breaks down. Rules become unenforceable. Which is what, precisely, is happening.

We love seeing him stick it to liberals, say Trumpists. Forget the Constitution! As long as it’s our guy, take the rule of law, the lifeblood of our republic, everything that has, till now, preserved and protected our form of government, and shove it. We. Don’t. Care.

When the Republican Party was producing decent people, like Dan Evans, Mark Hatfield, Margaret Chase Smith, Jacob Javits, Barry Goldwater, Everett Dirksen, Dwight Eisenhower, this would have been impossible. Even in recent memory, before whatever got to them got to them, Lapdog Lindsey Graham considered Trump a “race-baiting, xenophobic bigot; Trump’s now-chief of staff called him “a horrible human being,” Rick Perry called him “a cancer on conservatism.” What happened? Power — and money — happened. Cowardice happened. Foxification happened.

Trump calls a Constitutionally-authorized inquiry into certain of his activities an “attempted coup,” and, predictable as acidifying oceans, his blind followers buy it, repeat the phrase like quoting the Bible. Write outraged letters to the editor. The potential end of democracy doesn’t occur to them. The history of our founding doesn’t, either.

We’ve known for a while that today’s Republicans have discarded, like used tissues, the idea of fair elections, the importance to democracy of public education and an aggresive, inquisitive press. Have they now decided that, as long as he’s theirs, an unrestrained, autocratic “president” is OK, too? What do they think has, until now, made America great? Are those brilliantly rendered, permanently embedded checks and balances merely empty words, disposable on a whim? If you don’t see Trump’s dictatorial stonewalling of Congress as a danger, you neither understand nor accept the essence of America. You’re a false patriot. You reject the very concept of “a nation of laws.” This, of all things, shouldn’t be defined by party allegience.

Bill Clinton embarrassed himself and his supporters. I found Lindsey Graham’s self-righteous, lip-quivering outrage, back then, phony (where is it now?) But I never thought Congress hadn’t the right to impeach. It’s codified. It deodorizes the stink of corruption. Do Trump supporters love America for its uniquely brilliant and successful constitutional governance, or not? If so, will they vote Trump and his Congressional co-dependents out of office, to restore the Republic? Given Republican Congressional dereliction, they’re our last hope.

Nope. Not likely. It’d take acts of actual, selfless patriotism, not easy declarations. That ship has sunk.

Email Sid Schwab at columnsid@gmail.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Story Corps
Editorial: Political debate isn’t on Thanksgiving menu for most

A better option for table talk are family stories. Share them with the Great Thanksgiving Listen.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: State shouldn’t ease sentences for child sex predators

An advisory panel recommends legislation that would reduce sentences for those caught in predator stings.

Goldberg: A quiet march toward regime change in Venezuela

The Trump administration has less of a case for action against Maduro than it had for war in Iraq.

Comment: One word can get Trump back in climate fight: tariff

A global agreement to impose tariffs on countries that don’t reduce emissions could pressure the U.S.’s return.

Comment: The middle class is shrinking, yet we’re better off

A comparison of incomes between decades show gains for most Americans, even if we’re not feeling it.

Comment: Housing inequality is only going to get worse for now

More homes are being built, but market demand is for homes selling for $750,000 and higher.

FILE — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau logo is seen through a window at the CFPB offices in Washington on Sept. 23, 2019. Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Ting Shen/The New York Times)
Editorial: Keep medical debt off credit score reporting

The federal CFPB is challenging a state law that bars medical debt from credit bureaus’ consideration.

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Two ideas that could encourage housing construction

Give all residents of cities that build housing a rebate and ramp up construction of modular homes.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.