Separating hype from science in debate over sports and brain damage

  • By Ramesh Raghupathi, Eugene Hong and Thomas Trojian Special to The Philadelphia Inquirer
  • Friday, January 15, 2016 6:06pm
  • OpinionCommentarySports

We continue to hear their names: former NFL linebacker Junior Seau, Steelers Hall of Fame center Mike Webster, Eagles safety Andre Waters, Hall of Fame quarterback and sports commentator Frank Gifford. Since their deaths, they have become high-profile examples of people diagnosed with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative condition for which there is no cure and that can be diagnosed only by autopsy, after a person dies.

Former Raiders running back Maurice Jones-Drew and 49ers linebacker Chris Borland may have voluntarily removed themselves from the game based in part on concerns that continuing to play football would increase their risk of developing CTE.

In the docudrama “Concussion,” Will Smith portrays Bennet Omalu, the doctor who, among others, is credited with bringing to light the evidence of CTE in the brains of former NFL players. In doing so, he also exposed a problem that needs further evaluation to determine its significance. Now out in theaters, the film has already added fuel to a national discussion.

As many experts will agree, however, the relationship between developing CTE and playing football remains unclear. The link between the number of concussions a person sustains and the risk of developing CTE is also uncertain. A person sustaining a sports-related concussion is different from a person developing a myocardial infarction, where our ability to objectively diagnose and treat the patient in a way that will improve outcomes comes from experience and solid clinical research. We are still developing and learning the optimal means of evaluation and treatment of patients with sports-related concussions.

So we, as neuroscientists and sports-medicine clinicians, want to examine the following questions: What is our best understanding of the science on sports-related concussions? And how do we separate the science from the hype?

Here is what we know:

Postmortem analyses of the brains of some NFL and college football players demonstrate evidence of pathology, including neuronal loss, tau deposition and other findings, which are being called CTE.

Some living retired NFL players exhibit signs and symptoms of progressive neurodegenerative disease.

There is increased awareness about sports-related concussions.

Still, there are many important questions to be answered when it comes to determining the outcomes of sports-related concussions. Our studies and others from labs across the country are attempting to unravel these difficult questions about the short- and long-term effects of repeated brain trauma.

Here is what is unknown at this point:

Does a single concussion or repetitive concussions increase the risk of developing CTE?

Does a single concussion, overlapping concussions or separate multiple concussions result in permanent brain damage similar to that observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease)?

Is there a threshold number of hits to the head or concussions at which a child (or adult) may be at higher risk of developing CTE?

Do genetics predispose certain players to develop permanent brain damage?

Although there are a few reports that attempt to link sports-related concussions and neurodegenerative diseases, what is lacking are the controlled and rigorous prospective studies necessary to address these unanswered questions. This is important for us to establish for all athletes and other people who sustain sports-related concussions.

Where does this leave us? How do we keep sports as safe as we can and yet not limit or curtail the benefits of organized competitive physical activity? Should we as a society restrict or ban contact or collision sports, particularly for young athletes?

We propose that we need more informed discussion on these critical decisions about sports. We need to be vigilant since association is not causation. The benefits of participation in team sports are many and clear, and include providing lessons on values such as winning and losing, increasing parent-child interaction, and encouraging children to better interact with society. Furthermore, scientific evidence supports the importance of physical activity and exercise in improving brain health, particularly during the formative years.

As parents ourselves, as well as scientists and health-care providers, we are passionate about improving our understanding of sports-related concussions. While we wholeheartedly welcome the increased public awareness and societal discourse, what is further required is rigorous medical research that determines the effect of sports-related concussions on long-term outcomes. Only then can the hype be separated from the science.

Ramesh Raghupathi is a neurobiology and anatomy professor at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Eugene Hong is associate dean for primary care and community health at Drexel. Dr. Thomas Trojian is a professor of family, community and preventive medicine at Drexel.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, June 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: Let’s remember the ‘peaceably’ part of First Amendment

Most of us understand the responsibilities of free speech; here’s how we remind President Trump.

Schwab: Why keep up nonviolent protests? Because they work

Our greatest democratic victories came on the heels of massive, nationwide demonstrations.

Bouie: Trump’s weaknesses show through theater of strength

His inability to calmly confront opposition and respond with force betrays brittleness and insecurity.

Add your voice to protect freedoms at No Kings Day protests

Imagine it’s 2045. Nationwide, women have been fully stripped of rights to… Continue reading

Shouldn’t we value diversity, equity and inclusion?

If one were asked to describe the American Dream in a nutshell,… Continue reading

Why are we rooting against victims in Ukraine, Gaza?

When did we as a nation become less empathetic, less sympathetic, more… Continue reading

Trump should cancel Musk’s access to our personal data

Loved the recent editorial cartoons about the Trump-Musk feud. Now, if Donald… Continue reading

June 11, 2025: Tear Gaslighting
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, June 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Will public get a vote on downtown Everett stadium?

I see The Herald is enthusiastic about the push to build a… Continue reading

How are Trump’s actions the ‘will of the people’?

Calling up the National Guard is usually done in concert with a… Continue reading

Call constitutional convention for balanced budget amendment

Congress has not managed the federal purse well. We have been running… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.