Sex education should give kids all the facts

If our election practices aren’t identical across the state, at least our voluntary sex education programs can be.

For the third year in a row some legislators are trying to pass a bill that would require schools that teach sex education to follow a standardized program. This time around the proposal stresses abstinence, but not at the expense of providing accurate information about sex, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases.

Lawmakers should give the bill the OK so students can get the medically and scientifically accurate information they need to make smart decisions now and for the rest of their lives.

It’s unfortunate the two “sides” of sex education have been pitted against each other for so long. This delicate issue shouldn’t be about undoing the value system parents have instilled in their children or hiding valuable information from them that enriches their understanding of themselves and their world.

The program is encouraged and endorsed by the state Department of Health and the Office the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and it includes guidelines for sexual health information and disease prevention that should impress parents at both ends of the spectrum.

“Evidence suggests that sex education programs that provide information about both abstinence and contraception can delay the onset of sexual activity in teenagers …” according to “Guidelines for Sexual Health Information and Disease Prevention” released by the state DOH and OSPI earlier this month. It also says that parents communicating with their children about sex and sexuality plays a critical role in determining how kids will behave later on. So, parents who are worried a sex ed program at their child’s school will remove them and their values from the picture should be reassured that’s not the case at all. Just the opposite.

And if you’re wondering what all this talk about “medically and scientifically accurate information” is about – it means the information has been given the OK by respected organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Parents who argue teaching kids about sexual health encourages them to have sex are just as far off the mark as those who argue, “they’re going to do it anyway, we might as well tell them about it.” Responsible sexual health isn’t about sheltering teens or throwing up our hands in defeat. It’s about equipping young people with the scientific and medical information they need to effectively apply their values and principles to their real-life experiences.

Healthy sexuality means different things to different people. Sex ed programs that respect all these differences while offering accurate information stand the best chance of helping children keep themselves healthy – a goal every parent shares.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Find respectful policy on tariffs, trade with Canada

Washington state depends on trade with Canada. The Trump administration’s belligerence is harmful.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 22

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — A neighborhood in Poca across the Kanawha River from the John Amos Power Plant, a three-unit, coal-fired power plant in Winfield, W.Va., Sept. 19, 2025. In a reversal, the Environmental Protection Agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show. (Alyssa Schukar/The New York Times)
Comment: What happens now with end of a 2009 EPA climate finding

The Trump administration will move to kill climate regulations. But expect fact-based court challenges.

The Buzz: E.T., phone home and check your messages from Trump

President Trump says he’ll release files on aliens while Colbert weighs a campaign management career.

Everett City Council posts should be full-time jobs

Everett has grown into a regional city with regional responsibilities. Our City… Continue reading

Letter: Trump using office for personal profit

Where does the buck stop? Evidently, the bucks stop (and piles up… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Reform of tobacco taxes can fund response to its harms

Senate Bill 6129 better fits current products and directs revenue to public health work and research.

Comment: Cap on child care would harm families and employers

Leaving thousands out of a state child care program will be more costly to the state in the long run.

Comment: More taxes on health care won’t make state more affordable

Proposals in the Legislature could increase health care costs for workers and businesses.

Forum: Cuts to programs for vulnerable kids a costly bargain

Funding for developmentally disabled infants and toddlers reduces costs later in life. Cutting them makes no sense.

Forum: We have reached the peak of self-esteem’s self-assurance

Everybody daydreams of being a hero, but people need to recognize the value in playing their part.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.