Sex education should give kids all the facts

If our election practices aren’t identical across the state, at least our voluntary sex education programs can be.

For the third year in a row some legislators are trying to pass a bill that would require schools that teach sex education to follow a standardized program. This time around the proposal stresses abstinence, but not at the expense of providing accurate information about sex, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases.

Lawmakers should give the bill the OK so students can get the medically and scientifically accurate information they need to make smart decisions now and for the rest of their lives.

It’s unfortunate the two “sides” of sex education have been pitted against each other for so long. This delicate issue shouldn’t be about undoing the value system parents have instilled in their children or hiding valuable information from them that enriches their understanding of themselves and their world.

The program is encouraged and endorsed by the state Department of Health and the Office the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and it includes guidelines for sexual health information and disease prevention that should impress parents at both ends of the spectrum.

“Evidence suggests that sex education programs that provide information about both abstinence and contraception can delay the onset of sexual activity in teenagers …” according to “Guidelines for Sexual Health Information and Disease Prevention” released by the state DOH and OSPI earlier this month. It also says that parents communicating with their children about sex and sexuality plays a critical role in determining how kids will behave later on. So, parents who are worried a sex ed program at their child’s school will remove them and their values from the picture should be reassured that’s not the case at all. Just the opposite.

And if you’re wondering what all this talk about “medically and scientifically accurate information” is about – it means the information has been given the OK by respected organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Parents who argue teaching kids about sexual health encourages them to have sex are just as far off the mark as those who argue, “they’re going to do it anyway, we might as well tell them about it.” Responsible sexual health isn’t about sheltering teens or throwing up our hands in defeat. It’s about equipping young people with the scientific and medical information they need to effectively apply their values and principles to their real-life experiences.

Healthy sexuality means different things to different people. Sex ed programs that respect all these differences while offering accurate information stand the best chance of helping children keep themselves healthy – a goal every parent shares.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Robotic hand playing hopscotch on a keyboard. Artifical intelligence, text generators, ai and job issues concept. Vector illustration.
Editorial: Help the county write rules for AI’s robots

A civic assembly of 40 volunteers will be asked to draft policy for AI use in county government.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Jan. 31

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Roberts: Gutting of Clean Air Act will cost us in lives, more

Rejecting long-accepted science and recent findings, Trump’s EPA favors fossil fuels over Americans.

Comment: A millionaires’ tax won’t chase the wealthy out of state

Data refute the notion of migration to avoid taxes. Here’s what should guide the discussion in Olympia.

Commentary: Stop abuse of federal program to lower drug prices

The 340B drug pricing plan is meant to help low-income patients. It needs better oversight in this state.

Forum: Human loss seems inevitable when we decide who’s expendable

The distances we allow bring losses and failures: a nurse, a toddler, a Guard member and homelessness.

FILE — Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem speaks  following the shooting of Renee Nicole Good by a federal agent on Thursday, in New York, Jan. 8, 2026. Additional layers of review ordered by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, have slowed assistance to disaster-struck communities. (Angelina Katsanis/The New York Times)
Comment: When no one can believe anything anymore

Philosopher Hannah Arendt warned lies rob us of the ability to discern reality and make decisions.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Monroe’s Betzy Garcia celebrates scoring a touchdown against Everett during the game on Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: School levies, bonds invest in future of students

Several school districts seek the support of voters for levies and bonds in the Feb. 10 election.

Schwab: Trump and team heap outrages upon each tragedy

Defying our eyes, they slander Alex Pretti, and deny his rights along with his life to further chaos.

Block funding for DHS, ICE over Minneapolis killings

Two dead in Minneapolis. A 5-year-old kidnapped. This isn’t law enforcement; this… Continue reading

Bill to expand state AG investigations needs more review, debate

Snohomish County residents should know about Senate Bill 5925, as a Senate… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.