Sex education should give kids all the facts

If our election practices aren’t identical across the state, at least our voluntary sex education programs can be.

For the third year in a row some legislators are trying to pass a bill that would require schools that teach sex education to follow a standardized program. This time around the proposal stresses abstinence, but not at the expense of providing accurate information about sex, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases.

Lawmakers should give the bill the OK so students can get the medically and scientifically accurate information they need to make smart decisions now and for the rest of their lives.

It’s unfortunate the two “sides” of sex education have been pitted against each other for so long. This delicate issue shouldn’t be about undoing the value system parents have instilled in their children or hiding valuable information from them that enriches their understanding of themselves and their world.

The program is encouraged and endorsed by the state Department of Health and the Office the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and it includes guidelines for sexual health information and disease prevention that should impress parents at both ends of the spectrum.

“Evidence suggests that sex education programs that provide information about both abstinence and contraception can delay the onset of sexual activity in teenagers …” according to “Guidelines for Sexual Health Information and Disease Prevention” released by the state DOH and OSPI earlier this month. It also says that parents communicating with their children about sex and sexuality plays a critical role in determining how kids will behave later on. So, parents who are worried a sex ed program at their child’s school will remove them and their values from the picture should be reassured that’s not the case at all. Just the opposite.

And if you’re wondering what all this talk about “medically and scientifically accurate information” is about – it means the information has been given the OK by respected organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Parents who argue teaching kids about sexual health encourages them to have sex are just as far off the mark as those who argue, “they’re going to do it anyway, we might as well tell them about it.” Responsible sexual health isn’t about sheltering teens or throwing up our hands in defeat. It’s about equipping young people with the scientific and medical information they need to effectively apply their values and principles to their real-life experiences.

Healthy sexuality means different things to different people. Sex ed programs that respect all these differences while offering accurate information stand the best chance of helping children keep themselves healthy – a goal every parent shares.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, July 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Scott Spahr, Generation Engineering Manager at Snohomish County PUD, points to a dial indicating 4 megawatts of power production from one of two Francis turbine units at the Henry M. Jackson Powerhouse on Friday, Feb. 17, 2023, near Sultan, Washington. Some of the water that passes through units 3 and 4 — the two Francis turbines — is diverted to Lake Chaplain, which supplies water to Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Amber King best suited for PUD’s 2nd District seat

Among three solid candidates, King’s knowledge of utilities and contracts will serve ratepayers well.

From the Publisher: The Herald’s team is committed to readers

I’m returning as publisher to aid The Herald during its transition and continue its 123-year legacy.

Comment: We need to think hard on political discourse

The attempt on Donald Trump’s life should bring reflection on how we respond to others’ beliefs.

Comment: Vote yes to bring power of Everett port across county

A countywide port district would offer the tools and funding to foster economic development and jobs.

Forum: Port of Everett’s Prop 1 adds bureaucracy and new tax

Its yes campaign claims jobs and projects, but its tax and authority will diminish local control.

Comment: Court’s rulings a win for citizens over regulators

The rulings regarding ‘Chevron deference’ and the SEC keep the three branches in their lanes.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, July 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Vote 2024. US American presidential election 2024. Vote inscription, badge, sticker. Presidential election banner Vote 2024, poster, sign. Political election campaign symbol. Vector Illustration
Editorial: Return Wagoner and Low to 39th Disrict seats

‘Workhorse’ Republicans, both have sponsored successful solution-oriented legislation in each chamber.

Schwab: Attempt on Trump’s life doesn’t require giving up

Those opposed to a second Trump term still are allowed to speak their minds and cast their votes.

Vote for more of Port of Everett’s projects by voting for Prop. 1

Letters and editorials are flying, both pro and con, on Proposition 1:… Continue reading

We need answers to questions about Alderwood mall shooting

I was deeply saddened reading the article about the memorial service for… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.