Shouldn’t President Trump share in costs of security?

I’ve read about the tens of millions of dollars being spent for extra security for the Trump family.

The protection of the president and his family is necessary but in my opinion there should somehow be a limit on how much we can spend on a billionaire’s well being. Some of the extra cost should be borne by him.

Recently President Trump hosted China’s president Xi Jinping at the Southern White House, Mar-a-Lago. I’m wondering what the extent of security was there. Patrons of the club have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for the privileges of membership, which includes golfing and dining in some proximity to the presidential party. When members enter the facility are they searched for weapons, wanded when they have had joint replacement or banned from bringing in more than 4 ounces of liquid or aerosol cans of sunscreen? Are their purses and bags searched for nail clippers or pocket knives? If not, why not? If so, how do they like being treated like that?

Jeff Hegland

Tulalip

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, June 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

Burke: A parade for Army? Sure; but let a sibling march, too

The U.S. Merchant Marine has supplied the country’s fighting forces since the Revolutionary War.

Harrop: This isn’t the outcome that Musk likely imagined

After handing over $250 million to elect Trump, he got the job of taking heat for unpopular cuts.

Dowd: Musk moved fast and broke his own reputation

The head of the failed-DOGE experiment leaves Washington with a black eye and less respect.

Comment: GOP’s fiscal hawks get it; voters don’t care about debt

On a basic level they say they do, but they’re more concerned over inflation and cuts to their services.

Comment: Drilling in Alaska tough enough; Trump isn’t helping

Despite his drill-baby-drill promises, Trumps’ trade and energy policies are working against him.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, June 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Renovating of Funko Field cheaper than building new stadium

The City of Everett faces three stadium options: 1. Do nothing and… Continue reading

As candidates how they’ll address crime survivors’ needs

As campaign season kicks off for city council and mayoral races, it… Continue reading

Kristof: Rubio dead wrong that end of USAID hasn’t cost lives

He told Congress it was a lie, but consider two of thousands of examples of lives lost to aid cuts.

Douthat: Trump should embrace the TACO; it actually serves him

Trump’s willingness to backtrack when a plan isn’t working may actually help him seal deals.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.