Sorry, Mr. President, congressional gridlock here to stay

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, September 7, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON — When President Bush appealed to leaders of Congress last week for a show of bipartisanship to end the prospect of gridlock on major bills, he likely was wasting his breath. That, at least, is the clear message from three scholars who have assessed the situation.

All of them operate on the assumption that legislators will behave in a way that makes political sense for them and their parties, and they agree that conditions on Capitol Hill are hostile to Bush’s plea.

In a paper presented at the recent Boston convention of the American Political Science Association, Peter Trubowitz and Nicole Mellow of the University of Texas-Austin said that bipartisanship occurs only rarely and briefly under special circumstances, and those circumstances just don’t exist today.

At the same meeting, Sarah A. Binder of the Brookings Institution and George Washington University said the evidence shows that while gridlock may be damaging to the reputation of Congress, individual lawmakers are not punished by their voters for the failings of the institution and thus have little incentive to worry about such matters.

The Texas pair began by noting that partisanship is the natural condition of Congress, because its members "need the support of key constituencies (partisans) to get re-elected, (so) they tend to avoid taking policy positions that might antagonize party activists, campaign contributors and core supporters. … Because these groups have intense policy pr eferences, lawmakers are reluctant to reach across the aisle and vote for policy positions their partisans might deem too ‘soft’ or ‘weak.’"

That’s the general rule, Trubowitz and Mellow say, but there have been times in the past century where bipartisanship has emerged. Those times are "most likely to occur when the political parties are competitive and regionally dispersed, and when the national economy is growing."

Nationally, Republicans and Democrats are closely balanced, but, as many have noted, redistricting this past year protected so many incumbents that no more than 40 of the 435 House seats are really competitive. The country is sharply divided regionally — remember the red and blue states in 2000 — with each party dominant in its own geographical base. And the national economy, far from growing, has been mired for more than a year in job-sapping doldrums.

"During hard times," they say, "lawmakers will strongly advocate partisan positions (and) be less preoccupied with appealing to ‘swing’ voters and more concerned about shoring up their political base." Thus, their conclusion: "Given the tenuous balance of the two parties in the national government and the closeness of the 2000 election, the president’s overtures to bipartisanship are understandable. However, the parties are increasingly regionally polarized, the economy is stumbling in ways that highlight class differences, and a quick resolution to the war on terrorism is nowhere in sight. If the past is a predictor for the future, these are tough odds that the president faces. In all likelihood, finding a new bipartisan consensus will remain elusive."

But shouldn’t members of Congress worry about going home to face the voters with no Medicare prescription drug benefit, no patients’ bill of rights, no increase in the minimum wage and no real answers to budget deficits and a lagging economy?

The short answer, professor Binder says, is no.

"Poor legislative performance by Congress, in other words, is unlikely to affect candidates’ electoral fortunes. Voters might be turned off by legislative inaction, but are unlikely to hold incumbents’ performance against them in the voting booth."

Individual members of Congress are valued for their constituent services, their presence at local events and their ability to bring specific projects to their districts — and most face negligible, underfinanced opposition.

Binder finds no significant relationship between the degree of gridlock in Congress and the electoral fate of Congress as a whole or of its majority party.

The reputation of Congress as an institution does go down when gridlock surges, she says, and there is statistical evidence that gridlock may impel an increase in the number of members who retire voluntarily from office. But it just doesn’t hurt at election time.

Thus, "the dilemma of gridlock: Despite the harm frequent stalemate does to institutional reputations, there is little electoral incentive for legislators to address it."

The president can exhort all he wishes, these observers say, but he is not likely to produce bipartisanship or avoid gridlock. Sorry about that.

David Broder can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State single-payer health care bill offers many advantages

I was excited to read in Will Geschke’s report (“Everett lawmakers back… Continue reading

Important national story missing from Herald

I couldn’t find a report in The Herald that the Trump administration… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s ‘Man-of-Steel’ shtick will make U.S. weaker

Trump’s 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum will harm allies we need and won’t help industries here.

Comment: AG Bondi’s DEI memo more messaging than lawsuit threat

Talk of criminal investigations is intended to panic corporations into abandoning their DEI programs.

Goldberg: Why Musk, Vance went to bat for self-desribed racist

While a former Trump official is on the outs for doing his job, a proud racist gets his job back.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: State Democrats’ bill would undermine parental rights

The bill would allow kids as young as 13 to make mental health decisions without notice to parents.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.