Sound Transit shouldn’t rush a plan onto ballot

The need to continue improving our region’s transit systems is urgent. In choosing the next major steps, however, haste mustn’t trump good judgment.

The Sound Transit board voted Thursday to launch a public feedback process that could lead to putting a new package of projects before voters this November. Preliminary plans are scaled back from the roads and transit measure that voters rejected last fall, and neither of two 12-year proposals put forward would extend light rail into Snohomish County. (Last year’s proposal would have brought it north to 164th St. SW and I-5 by 2027.)

For a sales tax increase of 0.4 or 0.5 cents on the dollar, Snohomish County would see increased express bus service into King County, Park &Ride expansion and perhaps an investment in a commuter rail corridor that has been proposed between Snohomish and Renton.

Paul Roberts, an Everett City Council member and one of Snohomish County’s three representatives on the Sound Transit board, cast the lone vote Thursday against moving ahead. Far too many questions have yet to be answered about the next phase of transit construction, he said. He’s absolutely right.

For instance:

n If the board punts on extending light rail into Snohomish County, how much further off does that push the promise of bringing it to Lynnwood, let alone Everett? Will today’s twenty-somethings be retired before they can take light rail from Everett to Seattle?

n Expanding existing Park &Ride facilities along I-5 in Snohomish County is premature without first addressing congestion problems along the east-west corridors of 128th, 164th and 196th streets.

n Express buses depend on smooth-running HOV lanes to stay on schedule. Roberts points out that the state is currently studying HOV use and new recommendations could come next year. It’s prudent to wait for them.

Proponents of a 2008 vote may believe the large voter turnout expected because of the presidential race works in favor of approval. But the sagging economy doesn’t. Another rejection, just one year after the last, could be politically devastating for Sound Transit.

A vote in 2010, on the other hand, allows time to develop a plan that better connects the region. It also would take place after the 2009 launch of Central Link light rail between downtown Seattle and Sea-Tac Airport, which should serve to bolster voter confidence. And after two more years of high gasoline prices, public demand for transit may be greater than ever.

The plan for how to proceed with regional transit isn’t ready. It shouldn’t be taken to voters until it is.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

November 17, 2025: But Her Emails
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Where are cartoons lampooning Kamala Harris?

I agree with a recent letter writer, The Herald Opinion page’s cartoons… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons are satire; it’s to be expected

I have read and sent letters to the editor of The Herald… Continue reading

People should rely on own savings not on goverment assistance

Laudable is the social legislation that provides 26 weeks of subsidies to… Continue reading

Comment: What climate ‘realists’ miss are pledges’ quiet wins

Climate fatalists should consider that nations committed to reductions are meeting their targets.

Comment: Too many kids can’t read; blame lack of spelling tests

Leaving the task to spellcheck holds back kids’ skill and love of reading. Spelling is key to comprehension.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

Canceled flights on a flight boards at Chicago O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, on Friday, Nov. 7, 2025. Major airports appeared to be working largely as normal on Friday morning as a wave of flight cancellations hit the U.S. (Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times)
Editorial: With deal or trust, Congress must restart government

With the shutdown’s pain growing with each day, both parties must find a path to reopen government.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Ignoring Trump, stock market believes in climate crisis

Green energy and cleantech indices are outperforming the overall market. You can partially thanks AI’s demand.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.