Stop whining and protect your kids

  • By FROMMA HARROP / Providence Journal Columnist
  • Saturday, February 12, 2005 9:00pm
  • Opinion

Bob Thompson tells me he’s talked to sixth-graders who could quote chapter-and-verse from HBO’s “Sex and the City.” This surprised Thompson, who is director of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University.

And it shocked me. I’m barely mature enough to have watched that raunchy show. I loved “Sex and the City,” but it made me blush. Children have no business tuning in.

So whose fault is it when they do? Politicians say it’s Hollywood’s fault. Hollywood says it’s the parents’ fault. Parents say it’s the politicians’ fault for not stopping Hollywood.

Before those pointed fingers hurt anyone, let us pin down the problem: It’s not so much what’s on television, but what children are seeing. So before parents point a finger, they should lift it. They do have tools to control what their children watch.

“People are screaming bloody murder that there’s bad stuff on TV,” Thompson says, “but the little things they can do, they’re not doing.” More on those tools in a minute.

Television isn’t going back to the days of “Honey, I’m home!” and husbands sleeping in beds four yards from their wives’. Nor should we want it to.

The big change started with the 1970s series “All in the Family.” No one had heard characters like Archie and Edith Bunker talk about abortion, impotence and their raw prejudices on family-hour TV. (A warning preceded the show.) Before that, nothing had been broadcast that a 7-year-old couldn’t handle.

Television has turned progressively lewd, foul-mouthed and offensive. The trade-off is that it has become more grown-up and in many ways more interesting. Which cop show would you rather watch, the childish “CHiPs” of the 1980s or today’s “CSI”?

Vulgar and gritty TV is here to stay. The goal is to keep children away from it.

So back to the tools, or what Thompson lists as “the minimal things” parents can do. First there’s the V-chip. Remember that? The V-chip lets adults block certain programming based on one of eight ratings.

The most restrictive rating is TV-Y, designed for children age 2 to 6. It bars even frightening cartoons. The least limiting category is TV-MA, which cuts out programming meant for mature audiences only. This means shows with graphic violence, explicit sex and crude language.

The V-chip is required on most televisions sold in the last five years, yet few parents bother with it. “Only a tiny percentage is actually learning how to use the V-chip,” Thompson reports, “and it’s not hard to do.”

For more information about the V-chip, visit the FCC Web site at www.fcc.gov/vchip. The site offers a link to the directions.

The next thing parents can do, Thompson says, is to take the television out of their children’s bedrooms. “It’s like a liquor cabinet if you have little children in the house.” Parents can keep better track of TV viewing when it takes place in the family room.

I marvel at how those sixth-graders got through to “Sex and the City” – and how little their parents did to stop them. First off, the family had to have cable, which their parents paid for. HBO is a premium channel, so the parents had to pay extra for that. Most cable systems offer a “parental control” feature that locks objectionable channels. The parents obviously didn’t use it. Nor did they activate the V-chip, if they had one.

If the kids saw “Sex and the City” at a friend’s house, the parents didn’t adequately supervise where they went. If the kids saw it in the privacy of their own bedrooms, then the parents had ignored warnings against putting sets there.

Finally, I can’t rule out the horrifying possibility that the parents didn’t really mind if their sixth-graders watched “Sex and the City.” For all I know, they may have watched it together as family entertainment.

Parents do deserve more sympathy than offered so far. Protecting children from the rough content on TV is a much harder challenge today than a generation ago. But parents are far from powerless. Ultimately, nothing comes into the house that they don’t permit. And, as a last resort, they can always smash the television set.

Froma Harrop is a Providence Journal columnist. Contact her by writing to fharrop@projo.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, July 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Authorities search for victims among the rubble near Blue Oak RV park after catastrophic flooding on the Guadalupe River in Kerrville, Texas, on Sunday, July 6, 2025. The half-mile stretch occupied by two campgrounds appears to have been one of the deadliest spots along the Guadalupe River in Central Texas during last week’s flash floods. (Jordan Vonderhaar/The New York Times)
Editorial: Tragic Texas floods can prompt reforms for FEMA

The federal agency has an important support role to play, but Congress must reassess and improve it.

Comment: Midterm messaging fight for working class has begun

And Democrats have a head start thanks to the GOP’s all-in support for cuts to the social safety net.

Saunders: Considering attacks from left, ICE agents must mask

It’s not ideal, but with physical attacks against agents up 700%, the precaution is understandable.

Comment: Superman has been ‘woke’ as far back as Krypton

Conservative critics upset by the movie director’s comments on immigration need to read up on the hero’s origins.

Comment: GOP delayed worst of BBB’s cuts until after midterms

Republicans are counting on low-information voters’ party loyalty over their own financial interests.

Tufekci: Link between flood warnings and people wasn’t there

What might have saved many in Texas was a NWS coordinator position eliminated in the DOGE cuts.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, July 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — The sun sets over power lines in rural Ward County, Texas on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. Republicans plan to terminate billions of dollars in clean energy tax credits. Experts say that will mean more greenhouse gas emissions and more dangerous heat. (Paul Ratje/The New York Times)
Commentary: Bill will deliver dirtier energy at a higher price

Cuts to clean energy policy in the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will stifle our energy transition and cost us more.

Tufekci: ‘Garbage in, garbage out’ behind AI’s Nazi meltdown

That Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot defaulted to internet hate speech is concerning. Our acceptance is scarier.

Everett mayoral candidate had a role in budget problems

A mayoral candidate in Everett is being dishonest, blaming his opponent for… Continue reading

Social Security email was a false and partisan use of agency

I was appalled to get a spam email from the Social Security… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.