Taxing highest earners is wrong

April 15 is almost here. For many of us this date has no real significance. To me it has a profound impact on my perspective of what America has become. It marks a day where 47 percent of our citizenship will literally pay nothing in federal income taxes.

That’s right, we all get the benefits but only those deemed worthy will pay the price. You have heard the statistics, the top earners (those over $366,000 income) will pay 73 percent of all income tax revenues. I don’t earn that much, but I detest the fact that others pay for any benefit I receive in such a lop-sided way. I earn income from many of those in that bracket that take risks, and create jobs for me and others like me. To penalize them is to penalize me in a indirect fashion.

I don’t know of many people employed by low-income people. Do you? French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville warned us about this over 150 years ago. In his book “Democracy in America” he warned that our great experiment in representative government and the rule of law would be over when the people of America figured out that they could use their votes to take stuff away from their fellow Americans.

Our president has pushed tax cuts for low- and middle-income families and tax increases for the wealthy, arguing that wealthier taxpayers fared well in the past decade, so “it’s time to pay up.” The Bush tax cuts were nothing more than a favor to the wealthy who dare to earn more money. Instead, doesn’t that money belong to the wealthy people who earn it? Why is it “time to pay up” when the top 10 percent of earners already pay 73 percent in income taxes?

Don Thompson

Lake Stevens

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Getty Images
Editorial: Lawmakers should outline fairness of millionaires tax

How the revenue will be used, in part to make state taxes less regressive, is key to its acceptance.

Comment: Federal bankers deserve an F on climate threat

In dismissing the financial threat from the climate crisis, Fed bankers set the nation up for failure.

Comment: The federal agency brain drain will have dire effects

More than 10,000 workers with STEM doctorates are gone. Who will solve crises and innovate for America?

Ask lawmakers to reject bill to bar removal from tent encampments

Proposed Washington House Bill 2489, per media, is “the Shelters Not Penalties… Continue reading

Heritage Foundation to blame for Trump’s return

Do you recall the day when you lost faith in our democratic… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s election manuevers about more than ego-boosting

The president likely has designs on manipulating the midterms by casting doubt on results.

A horse near transmission lines in Houston, Sept. 20, 2023. Texas has grown to be the second-largest solar power producer in the country. (Annie Mulligan / The New York Times)
Comment: Two energy roads, different futures for world’s climate

The paths for fossil fuels and renewables are set, with countries choosing diverging road maps.

The Buzz: In celebration of bunnies, from Bugs to Bad

We can’t help but see some characteristics shared between Elmer Fudd and Donald Trump.

Comment: Revolutionary War fought by ordinary men and women

Early battles, such as at Moore’s Creek Bridge, and won by volunteer loyalists inspired others to join the fight.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.