The gulf between hope and change

A confession: I occasionally cry during romantic movies and History Channel documentaries. Another confession: I often pretend that I’m coughing or clearing my throat in order to obscure said crying from friends and family. But watching the presidential inauguration, I — like millions of Americans — lost the ability to hide a public case of ocular Niagara Falls.

History undoubtedly spurred some of our national outpouring this week. A black man being sworn in to lead a country built on slavery, segregation and persistent racism is an unfathomable landmark.

There were also tears of prospective jubilation. Hearing a new president deliver a Rooseveltian “we’re all in this together” speech instead of a Reagan-esque “every man for himself” diatribe implied the closure of an entire political era. In that sense, the moment felt like the first day of the rest of America’s life.

Transcending our past and beginning a new future — these are heady undertakings whose complexity and uncertainty explains the apprehension many sensed rumbling beneath their inaugural elation. Though presidential festivities and media superlatives tried to numb any feeling other than happiness, it’s only natural to experience a twinge of anxiety while celebrating at the edge of an abyss.

America is certainly optimistic that Obama will take bold action. But with failed get-rich-quick schemes now bleeding risk into every corner of the economy, it’s hard to feel like rescue is even possible. Indeed, with so many of the same people still calling the shots on Wall Street and in Washington, speeches about American resilience can seem like hospice anesthesia rather than promising reasons to hang on for a cure.

While rightfully commemorating Obama’s victory as a step toward Martin Luther King’s dream, African-Americans also wonder about new polls showing the country thinks racism isn’t a problem anymore. Black leaders fear that Obama’s ascent could be used as another excuse to ignore rampant inequalities. As Dr. King’s son warned: “Obama’s election is not a panacea for race relations in this country.” Can White America accept that truism?

Thinking about future generations, parents and youth fret about whether our government — even led by a forward thinker — can muster the will to fight climate change. Is spaceship Earth the Apollo 13, headed for a miraculous recovery? Or are we on the Challenger, destined for a deadly explosion?

These are only a few of what Donald Rumsfeld might call “known unknowns” — and the most opaque of them is Obama himself.

Cut through the meaningless platitudes describing our new president as a post-partisan, post-racial pragmatist, and you find a brilliant leader who organized us around optimism. Then consider that leader’s behavior since the election, and you run into that nagging speck of doubt. His less-than-inspiring Cabinet appointments, his support of Bush’s Wall Street bailout, his embrace of nonsensical corporate tax cuts — these moves raise questions about whether Obama is willing to differentiate between his two campaign themes: hope and change.

While both those things have lately been in short supply, the distance between them on policy is the gulf separating ambition and realization. Hope is a bill peppered with “may” — the word that merely asks banks or polluters to regulate themselves. Change is a statute teeming with “shall” — a term forcing its targets to comply. Hope is telegenic glamour, winning smiles, and poignant one-liners. Change is all the grinding work and uncomfortable confrontations that come with challenging power and enacting transformative laws.

The reason so many cried this week is because we can finally glimpse that change in the distance. And yet, those pangs of concern linger. They don’t undermine the euphoria or diminish Obama’s promise. But they do recognize that we worry about hope’s mirage — and pray there are no illusions this time.

David Sirota is a syndicated columnist based in Denver. His e-mail address is ds@davidsirota.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Washington state's Congressional Districts (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: State lawmakers right to skip Gerrymandering Games

While red and blue states look to game the midterms, Washington is wisely staying out of that fray.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 31

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: A recap of The Herald’s primary endorsements

Primary elections, setting the November ballot, are no time for voters to sit on the sidelines.

Comment: Ignoring the math of climate chaos will cost us

Ending the EPA’s duty to limit greenhouse gases will save us $1 trillion; at the cost of $87 trillion. Or more.

Stephens: For all his faults, Trump has notched some wins

We’ll be better off if we can acknowledge some of Trump’s decisions are producing good results.

Everett council, Dist. 4: Battle prioritizes public safety

Everett City Council is an all-white body that governs a city with… Continue reading

Everett mayoral race: Murphy best on public safety

As someone who served alongside Scott Murphy on the Everett City Council… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Newman for Edmonds; Paige for Mountlake Terrace

Both lead strong fields of candidates for the city councils of each south county city.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: In strong field, Sterba best for Mukilteo council post

James Sterba is a veteran Boeing engineer who offers a strong financial background.

Trump should come clean about Epstein relationship

Is Donald Trump finally meeting his personal Waterloo? Trump is desperately trying… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: Lies, damn lies and weasel words; and how to spot them

Whether it’s advertising or a certain president’s statements, the intent is to avoid the truth.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.