Trivial pursuit of politics angers voters

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Saturday, October 5, 2002 9:00pm
  • Opinion

LOS ALTOS, Calif. — In the past two weeks, I have been mingling with voters from Jacksonville, Fla., to this suburb of San Francisco, with stops in between in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Minnesota. If there is one common complaint among them, it is the trivialization of important issues, both in campaigns and in government.

The people I met have a lot of serious concerns on their minds: a far-from-finished war on terrorism; a looming war with Iraq; a prolonged stall in economic growth that has boosted unemployment; a bust in the stock market that has wiped out trillions of dollars of retirement savings; a health-care system whose costs are spinning out of control, leaving more millions uninsured; an airline and passenger railroad system threatened with bankruptcy; a return to borrowing by the federal government, draining Social Security instead of bolstering it for the retirement needs of the baby boomers; shortfalls in state budgets that have cut programs and forced tax increases, and schools which in too many communities are failing children.

You might think all this would heighten interest in the elections just a month away — especially since even a slight shift in the balance of power could dramatically alter the agendas of the House and Senate and change the prospects for the balance of President Bush’s term.

Instead, what you find is galloping indifference and utter cynicism about the choices the ballot presents. Why? Listen to what people say.

One person I met here asked: "Why is it that when deeply serious things happen in Washington — for example, the vanishing of the federal surplus — it is as if a sitcom is changing one of its actors? No one notices."

Or this from Janice Morse, a retired computer specialist I met while door-knocking in Plainville, Conn. When I asked her about the coming congressional election in her area, one of the country’s most competitive races, Mrs. Morse turned her scorn on Congress. "They piddle away so much time on trivial things," she said. "They argue about killing mosquitoes in some swamp in Florida, when the country needs a new Medicare plan."

Anyone who has joined Mrs. Morse in glancing at C-SPAN coverage of Congress in recent weeks would likely agree with her. Forget about tackling the big issues. The House cannot even pass the basic spending bills to fund government agencies. The Senate is hung up on creating a new Department of Homeland Security by its inability to agree with the White House on language assuring workers their employment rights.

Until the resolution of support for the president on Iraq came forward, both the House and Senate were filling time on questions not much more important than Mrs. Morse’s mosquito bill.

As for the campaigns that will determine the makeup of the next Congress and the governors of 36 states, trivial is too kind a word for their content. The ads people are seeing are relentlessly negative: loaded words and nasty implications about the opposition candidate; often, never a hint as to why a voter should support the person paying for the TV spot.

Here are a couple examples from campaigns I’ve been covering of how serious issues are being twisted into cudgels for bloodying opponents.

A North Carolina Democratic Party ad against Senate candidate Elizabeth Dole, as transcribed by the political newsletter The Hotline:

Woman: "I say let Social Security stay just like it is. They will have to cut benefits if they put it in the stock market." Announcer: "That’s why Erskine Bowles is opposed to privatizing Social Security. But Elizabeth Dole still wants to gamble Social Security money in the stock market, even though it would reduce guaranteed benefits for retirees." Woman: "Without Social Security, I couldn’t make it; that’s for sure." Man: "I think somebody should tell Elizabeth Dole not to put our Social Security money in the stock market."

Or this Republican ad against Michigan gubernatorial candidate Jennifer Granholm, again transcribed by The Hotline:

A woman, shuffling many pills: "Imagine what all this costs. Staying well is really expensive. What if I got really sick? How will I afford my medication if Jennifer Granholm gets elected and lets my property taxes go up? I can make it work now, but with a Granholm property tax hike, I don’t know what I’d do. Granholm’s plans for taxes will hurt too many people. Granholm is just too big a risk."

Ads such as these — and there are thousands of them — not only distort, they disgust people seeing them. No wonder so many turned-off voters dread what the next month of trivialized politics will bring.

David Broder can be reached at The Washington Post Writers Group, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, DC 20071-9200.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Robotic hand playing hopscotch on a keyboard. Artifical intelligence, text generators, ai and job issues concept. Vector illustration.
Editorial: Help the county write rules for AI’s robots

A civic assembly of 40 volunteers will be asked to draft policy for AI use in county government.

February 1, 2026: The Self-Portrait
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Roberts: Gutting of Clean Air Act will cost us in lives, more

Rejecting long-accepted science and recent findings, Trump’s EPA favors fossil fuels over Americans.

Comment: A millionaires’ tax won’t chase the wealthy out of state

Data refute the notion of migration to avoid taxes. Here’s what should guide the discussion in Olympia.

Commentary: Stop abuse of federal program to lower drug prices

The 340B drug pricing plan is meant to help low-income patients. It needs better oversight in this state.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Monroe’s Betzy Garcia celebrates scoring a touchdown against Everett during the game on Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: School levies, bonds invest in future of students

Several school districts seek the support of voters for levies and bonds in the Feb. 10 election.

Forum: Human loss seems inevitable when we decide who’s expendable

The distances we allow bring losses and failures: a nurse, a toddler, a Guard member and homelessness.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Jan. 31

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem speaks  following the shooting of Renee Nicole Good by a federal agent on Thursday, in New York, Jan. 8, 2026. Additional layers of review ordered by Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, have slowed assistance to disaster-struck communities. (Angelina Katsanis/The New York Times)
Comment: When no one can believe anything anymore

Philosopher Hannah Arendt warned lies rob us of the ability to discern reality and make decisions.

Schwab: Trump and team heap outrages upon each tragedy

Defying our eyes, they slander Alex Pretti, and deny his rights along with his life to further chaos.

Block funding for DHS, ICE over Minneapolis killings

Two dead in Minneapolis. A 5-year-old kidnapped. This isn’t law enforcement; this… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.