Voters reject roads and transit, embrace red tape

Last week we voted down a multi-billion dollar proposal for roads and transit. It got me thinking back to 1968. That was the year we had a chance in King County to build rapid transit county-wide. The federal government would have matched every dollar nine-to-one. The bond issue got over 50 percent of the vote. So how come there was no mass transit? As a bond issue it needed 60 percent. What happened to the federal match? If you go to Atlanta, you can ride their fast and efficient rail system, built with money targeted for Seattle!

We have a history of rejecting ballot issues that would have resulted in a 21st century transit system. We also have a history of passing ballot measures that put the squeeze on funding already targeted to roads and transit. In 1999 we approved a measure to roll back the motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) for 80 percent of the vehicles on the road (and increase it for those cars that were over ten years old). The State Supreme Court found this initiative unconstitutional, but the Legislature passed it into statute anyway. They figured they could somehow make up the funding loss and not risk a voter backlash. It worked for a while, but when the recession hit, the back-fill funding dried up. This paved the way for a gas tax increase that recouped less than half of MVET funding. So we are still behind the eight-ball, with population growth and economic growth increasing the demands on transit.

In 2001, Initiative 747 was voted through, limiting a taxing district’s property tax increase to one percent, regardless of inflation. That’s the initiative that the State Supreme Court also found unconstitutional, just last week. Listening to Tim Eyman, the initiative sponsor, you would have thought that property taxes will skyrocket. What he didn’t say is that the law merely reverts to what it was under Referendum 47, which limits taxing districts’ property tax increases to inflation or six percent, whichever is less. This is a reasonable measure, one that the Legislature and the governor seem to have forgotten in their haste to reassure the media that they too, just like Tim Eyman, want nothing to do with taxes. The politicians are worried about the next election, not about the best policy.

Shortsighted? Undemocratic? That seems to be a recurring theme from last week’s election. Initiative I-960, will, if upheld, require a two-thirds vote of both the Senate and the House and an advisory vote of the people for any tax measure or user fee increase. So if, for example, the state needs a fee increase to pay for sno-parks because more people are using them this winter, it would first have to get a legislative super-majority and a vote of the people. If the state wanted to increase copying fees, that too would have to get a super-majority and a vote of the people. So we get more red tape and fewer public investments.

As is the case with most of Tim Eyman’s initiatives, this one is so poorly thought out that it will most likely be found unconstitutional and thrown out. But it will still have its impact, with the Legislature afraid of its own shadow when it comes to funding through increased taxes or user fees the things that we all expect from government — good state parks, good schools, good universities, good roads, good ferries.

The odd thing about these initiatives to cut funding for government is that they fall on those election years when the fewest people vote and the voting electorate is the most conservative. Initiative 695 was in 1999, Initiative 747 was in 2001, Initiative 960 was this year. So that means that even in winning, the most recent initiative received the approval of less than one quarter of registered voters.

But we are not fooled all of the time. When all the votes from last week are counted, House Joint Resolution 4204 will pass, amending the state Constitution so that a simple majority of voters can approve school levies. We citizens in Washington understand that to have a good public education system, we have to invest in it. In a democracy, that decision to invest should not be held hostage by a minority of voters.

John Burbank, executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Write to him in care of the institute at 1900 Northlake Way, Suite 237, Seattle, WA 98103. His e-mail address is john@eoionline.org.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Retain Escamilla, Binda on Lynnwood City Council

Escamilla was appointed a year ago. Binda is serving his first term.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Blame Democrats’ taxes, rules for out-of-state ferry contract

Gov. Bob Ferguson should be ashamed of the hypocrisy shown by choosing… Continue reading

Letter used too broad a brush against Democrats

In response to a recent letter to the editor, this Democrat admits… Continue reading

Kristof: Women’s rights effort has work to do in Africa, elsewhere

Girls in Sierra Leone will sell themselves to pay for school. The feminist movement has looked away.

French: Supreme Court hits a vile industry with its comeuppance

While disagreeing on the best test, the justices agreed on the threat that porn poses to children.

Comment: When ‘politically correct’ becomes ‘Trump approved’

Companies and reporters are seeing the consequences of using words the president doesn’t approve of.

A Volunteers of America Western Washington crisis counselor talks with somebody on the phone Thursday, July 28, 2022, in at the VOA Behavioral Health Crisis Call Center in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Dire results will follow end of LGBTQ+ crisis line

The Trump administration will end funding for a 988 line that serves youths in the LGBTQ+ community.

toon
Editorial: Using discourse to get to common ground

A Building Bridges panel discussion heard from lawmakers and students on disagreeing agreeably.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: A plan to supply drugs to addicts is a dangerous dance

A state panel’s plan to create a ‘safer supply’ of drugs is the wrong path to addiction recovery.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.