When hospital rates are charged at the doctor’s office

The following editorial appeared in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Thursday:

One of the chief arguments for making health insurance, and therefore health care, accessible to more Americans is so that routine treatment can be obtained in the doctor’s office rather than in the more specialized, more costly emergency room.

It’s good for the patient, good for the insurer and good for a society that desperately needs to reduce health care costs.

But hospitals have turned that notion on its head by seeking hospital-size reimbursements for care delivered in doctor’s offices. How can that be?

The case of a Pittsburgh-area man, as recently reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, showed that although the patient had a routine, 20-minute exam in his dermatologist’s office, he later received two bills – one from the doctor and one from a hospital five miles away.

It turns out that, under Medicare rules, certain freestanding clinics can be considered hospital-based facilities, letting clinics charge inpatient-type fees for outpatient-type care. Because the billing practice is permitted by the Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services, the hospital in question is not the only health care provider taking advantage. The news story reported that many other hospitals do the same.

This is unconscionable and should be material for a congressional investigation. What other gaping loopholes in federal regulations must be closed?

A hospital spokeswoman said that under the CMS guidelines and insurer contracts, “facility fees may be charged in hospital-based clinics to reflect the cost of services and meeting certain regulatory standards regarding patient safety and quality.” It’s hard to conceive of what hospital-grade enhancements are being provided in a second-floor dermatologist’s office above a gym that would merit a separate hospital invoice.

It’s the kind of billing practice that breeds consumer cynicism about health care providers and the kind of lax oversight by government that shows no one is minding the store.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

New pharmacy at Everett clinic site will aid patients

I applaud our local pharmacist Sovit Bista for opening Robin Hood Pharmacy… Continue reading

Goldberg: ICE killing of Renee Good meant as message for us all

Civil rights, not just of immigrants, but of all Americans are being curtailed. Protest no longer is protected speech.

Comment: DOJ’s voter info demand a data breach waiting to happen

A centralized database of sensitive information is prone to abuse, theft and human error.

Kristof: In Venezuela, Trump trades rule of law for rule of oil

Its socialist government, which lost the last election, remains in power; as long as it bends to Trump.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Washington state's Congressional Districts adopted in 2021. (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: Lawmakers shouldn’t futz with partisan redistricting

A new proposal to allow state lawmakers to gerrymander congressional districts should be rejected.

Four people were injured in a suspected DUI collision Saturday night on Highway 99 near Lynnwood. (Washington State Patrol)
Editorial: Numbers, results back lower BAC for Washington

Utah’s experience backs Sen. John Lovick’s bill to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers to 0.05.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Supreme Court readies lifeline for House Republicans

A final gutting of the Voting Rights Act could swing districts to the GOP at all election levels

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.