Why are teachers only ones graded?

Since teachers are “graded” on their performance based on the score that students receive, I would like to propose that other professionals that are funded by tax dollars be graded the same way.

As everyone knows, the test scores that students receive are collected without factoring in the other things going on in a student’s life. No allowance is given for students who have a physical or mental issues that limit their ability to focus on the test. Neither does it take into consideration excessive absences or other factors that affect the outcome of the test scores. The test scores do not take any “abnormal” circumstances into account when these scores are recorded.

Let us grade the local police department on their performance based entirely on the outcome of their encounter with citizens. Is this a fair way to judge the job performance? Without taking into account the mental or physical state of the citizens that they interact with, or other factors, does it make sense to assume that the officer is not doing their job correctly?

Let us look at the mayor’s office or county government and evaluate their performance the same way. If the citizens of their city do not obey the laws, take proper care of their homes or family, show up for work every day, or do over things that affect their daily lives, should the mayor be “graded on” how well that he/she is performing their job?

I can think of many more publicly funded organizations, but I think that you get the point that I am trying to make. It does not make sense to grade a teacher’s performance basted on situations that are completely out of the teacher’s control. There are simpler, less time and resource-consuming ways to decide if a teacher is doing their job.

In an economic time as we are in right now, why are we taking our valuable time and resources to evaluate teachers with a system that does little to actually measure their performance? Any school administrator can tell you how well their teachers are doing without these test scores. They can use factors such as economic base, attendance base, or other variables to “predict” what these test scores tell us. They can do this with data that they already have.

Please encourage our government to put those resources into education and not into taking away from education.

Carol Whitney

Marysville

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Mata, Leutwyler for Lynnwood council seats

With the city facing a budget crisis, voters will determine who serves on four council seats.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Oct. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

County sheriff has balance right on use of police pursuits

The article by The Herald’s Jenna Millikan regarding police pursuits was well… Continue reading

SNAP’s aid should be restored

Thanks for the articles explaining the cost of the Big, not so… Continue reading

Dowd: The stuff that nightmares are made of; AI takes Hollywood

Actors and others are alarmed by the latest starlet: Tilly Norwood, an AI creation that doesn’t age.

Comment: Why the FBI is preparing a ‘perp walk’ for Comey

With flimsy charges against Comey, the chance to humiliate the former FBI chief may be Trump’s only win.

Comment: Path is slim, very slim, for Democrats to retake Senate

The party’s low chances in the Senate explain why it’s putting much of its effort into winning the House.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), right, arrives to join Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) at a news conference on Capitol Hill after the House passed a stopgap bill to keep federal funding flowing past a Sept. 30 deadline on Friday, Sept. 19, 2025. The House narrowly passed the bill on Friday, but the measure appears dead on arrival in the Senate, where Democrats have vowed to block it. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Democrats point to problem deeper than the shutdown

Two state Democrats say they are holding out to force talks on a looming health care crisis.

Comment: Supreme Court term likely to be a momentous one

After signaling an expansion of Trump’s powers earlier, the court majority could make those official.

Comment: Hegseth gives a masterclass in poor leadership

Focusing on appearance, rather than a changing battlefield, Hegseth fakes it in front of skilled leaders.

Where are the officials who serve constituents?

I was just wondering why while the MAGA type politicians get further… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.