Wishful thinking is a poor substitute for real planning

  • Larry Simoneaux
  • Tuesday, September 6, 2005 9:00pm
  • Opinion

Some thoughts regarding the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina:

(1.) We humans – in the aggregate – do seem to have the remarkable ability to ignore things we don’t want to face, don’t we?

I was 17 when Hurricane Betsy hit New Orleans in 1965.

Guess what happened?

A large part of the city flooded.

Do the math. That was 40 years ago, almost to the day.

I was at Louisiana State University in the late 1970s. I remember a bull session in the Marine Sciences Department. There, several professors described what would happen if the city ever took a direct hit from a major hurricane. That almost-30-year-old bull session played out on television about a week ago.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

What happened in New Orleans happened because we (you, me, them, us, Republicans, Democrats, local, state and federal governments) didn’t do what was necessary. It was just too expensive, too complex, too hard, too whatever.

So we kept rolling the dice and praying.

We crapped out this time because we ignored what we knew was going to eventually happen – hopefully on someone else’s watch.

Now, maybe, we’ll finally do what needs doing.

(2.) As regards personal preparation for a disaster:

Anyone counting on government (at any level) to arrive in force within a day or two of a major catastrophe is, one day, going to be sorely disappointed.

Relief in the wake of a major catastrophe is pretty much like an approaching storm. First, you hear that it’s coming, but it takes a while for anything to start happening. That’s when you start wondering if it’s coming at all. Then, when it finally shows up, it seems pretty weak and paltry at first. Then, the full force arrives and you get inundated.

Could things have happened faster? I don’t know. The affected area wasn’t just New Orleans. The damage stretched all the way to Mobile, Ala. It takes time to mobilize a response to that kind of a hit.

Forget the news twit who said: “If we could get here, why couldn’t the government?”

If all you want to bring is a camera to film a disaster, anyone could’ve been there in about four hours. However, when you need to help hundreds of thousands of people in an area covering thousands of square miles, it’s going to take time.

Was five days too long? For those going through hell on the ground, you bet it was. For those trying to make things happen, I’ll bet it seemed like the blink of an eye. There’ll be answers soon and, if someone or some agency royally screwed up, heads will most certainly (and rightfully) roll.

All of which leads to a question we should be asking ourselves. Are we ready for a day or two without a society? Could we manage three days? How about four or five?

Of course, we could all just ignore making personal preparations because nothing could ever happen here, could it? Never felt the earth move under our feet, have we?

(3.) Finally, as regards self protection:

The veneer of civilization is pretty darned thin. Even on our best days – the days when we have judges judging, cops and firefighters doing the work of the Lord, and politicians telling us how great it’s going to be when they get into office – all you have to do is pick up the paper and read about who did what to whom yesterday. It’s usually pretty ugly.

There are some pretty nasty characters out there who’ll try to hurt you even with society up and running. Take away courts, cops, law, electricity, food, water and shelter. Now, how do you think those folks will behave? Once the structures of society go down, you’re going to be pretty much on your own for a bit.

There was the story of a homeowner in New Orleans who had a small generator powering his house. He was approached by several thugs holding knives and machetes. They informed him that they wanted his generator. He fired several rounds from a .357 magnum over their heads and they scattered.

Owning a firearm is a decision each of us has to make. However, throughout history, the predators have been out there. In times of chaos, they have a choice as to whom they’ll prey upon – either those able to defend themselves or the unarmed and helpless. Guess which group they generally choose? Too, they might not stop at wanting just your food, water or car.

Look around at your loved ones. You’re their last line of defense.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Comments can be sent to larrysim@att.net.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, June 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If it’s jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

Comment: Trump’s tariffs could ground aerospace’s rebound

Just as Boeing and Airbus had worked out most of their supply chain kinks, the threat of tariffs looms.

French: Trump, as he hoped, gets his excuse for conflict

It’s on the slightest of pretenses, but Trump is getting the showdown he desired in California.

Goldberg: Musk should be a warning to CEOs aligning with Trump

Even if they chafed under Democratic policy, now they’re left to a president’s unpredictable whims.

Comment: Heat is on for workers, but RFK Jr. sees no problem

Even as a summer of record heat approaches, protections for workers are lagging, if not being canceled.

Comment: Supreme Court gave DOGE the keys to kingdom

The court’s decision, without detailing its reasoning, is blow against the protection of data privacy.

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

A rendering of the new vessels to be built for Washington State Ferries. (Washington State Ferries)
Editorial: Local shipyard should get shot to build state ferries

If allowed to build at least two ferries, Nichols Brothers can show the value building here offers.

Solar panels are visible along the rooftop of the Crisp family home on Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: ‘Big, beautiful bill’ would take from our climate, too

Along with cuts to the social safety net, the bill robs investments in the clean energy economy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, June 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s science policy won’t set a ‘gold standard’

It’s more about centralizing control of science to make it easier to deny what it doesn’t agree with.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.