With prescription drugs, costliest isn’t always best

  • By Dr. Hugh Straley and Dr. John Verrilli
  • Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:00pm
  • Opinion

Recent news coverage of health plans’ requirement that patients try less expensive generic drugs before covering more expensive, brand-name prescription drugs might leave reasonable people concerned.

Don’t be.

A variety of prescription drugs are available to treat many conditions. More generics are available now than ever before. And, doctors agree, choosing the right drug isn’t a “one size fits all” proposition.

Yet, in the absence of a contraindication for any specific patient, common sense (and volumes of scientific evidence) suggest it’s best to start with proven drugs that are effective for the vast majority of people. Beyond that prerequisite, there’s no point in stepping up to more expensive brand-name drugs, unless a doctor determines it’s in the best interest of the patient.

This step-by-step process is the foundation not only of prescribing drugs, but of all medicine. “When you hear hoof beats,” young medical students are taught from Day One, “don’t start by looking for zebras.”

Neither should doctors look first to the newest or most heavily advertised drugs to treat things like high cholesterol. With prescription drugs, “new” does not necessarily mean better. Sometimes, it means “worse” (remember Vioxx?). Often, the most heavily advertised drugs are no better for most patients than those with long track records of safety and efficacy.

Generally, the most significant difference between well-known, brand-name drugs and their generic counterparts is their price. For the vast majority of patients seeking to lower their cholesterol, the relatively small differences in formulations between generic and brand-name statin drugs aren’t usually sufficient to warrant paying two, three, or 10 times as much for the one whose patents have not yet expired.

Importantly, for those patients for whom a higher-priced, brand-name drug does make medical sense, there are alternatives. Many insurers will allow coverage for this “next step” when a doctor concludes it’s medically necessary to serve the patient. And even when coverage isn’t available, options are.

Public skepticism – perhaps grounded in fears that managing cost means limiting access to drugs, doctors and care – is understandable, but unwarranted. Organizations and physicians continue to apply more enlightened approaches based on medical and scientific evidence, quality improvement and patient engagement.

Old suspicions may die hard, especially amid multi-billion-dollar advertising campaigns by pharmaceutical companies, but before dismissing your doctor’s recommendation of a generic drug, consider the following.

The Food and Drug Administration recognizes generics as a safe and smart option. Every single generic drug that reaches the U.S. market passes the same rigorous safety and efficacy review and approval processes as any brand-name drug.

The Puget Sound Health Alliance, composed of more than 140 physician, consumer, hospital, employer, insurer and other groups, strongly supports the use of generics as drugs of first choice when appropriate for individual patients. Such diverse organizations don’t always agree on contentious issues, but on this one, there is strong support.

Most of our region’s highly regarded physicians and medical experts concur. Working with the Alliance, they’ll be part of a forthcoming effort to help patients see the value in generics as a smart choice for good health and for more affordable care.

Common sense suggests resisting the temptation to believe everything we see or hear in advertising, or to assume that a brand name alone makes a drug better.

In the final analysis, your choice is between scientifically demonstrated results that can also make health care more affordable, and the pervasive claims of well-financed drug marketing campaigns.

When you consider whom to trust, remember that education is the strongest medicine, and common sense the best prescription.

Hugh Straley, MD, is medical cirector of Group Health and vice chair of the board of Puget Sound Health Alliance. John Verrilli, MD, is an internist at Minor &James Medical, chief of medicine at Swedish Medical Center, First Hill, and a member of the Alliance’s Clinical Improvement Team on Pharmaceuticals.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A Volunteers of America Western Washington crisis counselor talks with somebody on the phone Thursday, July 28, 2022, in at the VOA Behavioral Health Crisis Call Center in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Dire results will follow end of LGBTQ+ crisis line

The Trump administration will end funding for a 988 line that serves youths in the LGBTQ+ community.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Students can thrive if we lock up their phones

There’s plenty of research proving the value of phone bans. The biggest hurdle has been parents.

Dowd: A lesson from amicable Founding Foes Adams and Jefferson

A new exhibit on the two founders has advice as we near the nation’s 250th birthday in the age of Trump.

GOP priorities are not pro-life, or pro-Christian

The Republican Party has long branded itself as the pro-life, pro-Christian party.… Continue reading

Was Republicans’ BBB just socialism for the ultra-rich?

It seems to this reader that the recently passed spending and tax… Continue reading

Comment: $100 billion for ICE just asks for waste, fraud, abuse

It will expand its holding facilities, more than double its agents and ensnare immigrants and citizens alike.

toon
Editorial: Using discourse to get to common ground

A Building Bridges panel discussion heard from lawmakers and students on disagreeing agreeably.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Alaina Livingston, a 4th grade teacher at Silver Furs Elementary, receives her Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination clinic for Everett School District teachers and staff at Evergreen Middle School on Saturday, March 6, 2021 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: RFK Jr., CDC panel pose threat to vaccine access

Pharmacies following newly changed CDC guidelines may restrict access to vaccines for some patients.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, July 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Supreme Court’s majority is picking its battles

If a constitutional crisis with Trump must happen, the chief justice wants it on his terms.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.