Shoreline schools
Do what’s right for all Shoreline kids
The Sunset community is advocating for a fair and balanced process based on reliable data. We are a “grass-roots, parent-driven effort” who are not hysterically advocating for our own school to remain open at the expense of the entire district. We have many talented current and former families who are helping us in the legal, public relations and fact-finding aspects of our effort to do what is right for the children and families of Shoreline.
The process followed by the District Advisory Committee for Programs and Operations (DACPO) set up by the School District Administration did not follow the criteria set by the state or even the committee itself.
Our community wants elected school board officials to get the all of the facts so they can make informed, thoughtful decisions. We encourage you to visit www.saveshorelineschools.com for information, contacts, links for data and helpful ideas to save our school(s) from a poorly planned “Band-Aid” solution to a budgetary problem that our school district administration created over the past few years.
With school closures, every family in the district will be affected in some way. Class sizes will go up. School enrollment will exceed 500 students in all remaining facilities — Meridian Park will exceed 800 students! Incidentally, 10 plus years of nationally and internationally recognized research recommends that the “ideal” elementary school model is 300-400 students, not DACPO’s recommended 508 students.
Sunset Elementary is a school worth saving. Not just because our school is a “high performing elementary school” (state OSPI guidelines) or because we have dedicated teachers and a wonderful multi-cultural family, but because our community cares about the future of all Shoreline children. We all need to ensure that the Shoreline school administration and school board follow through and develop a comprehensive long-term plan for our schools. They need to find acceptable, cost cutting savings in all areas of the budget before targeting our schools for closure. The alternative is that your current home school will be crammed with 500-550 students in September — and your child may not be one of them.
Suzanne Gugger
Shoreline
Schools
What results with the Shoreline laptops?
Any good scientist will never set up an experiment without understanding the kind of data that will be generated. If the type and quality of data obtained cannot be interpreted or understood, the experiment is a total waste of time, money and resources.
The laptop initiative has been variously called a roll-out, a continuation of a roll-out and other procedural titles that essentially say “experiment.” What is the data read-out of this experiment? Any soft science surveys that ask “Do you think it is good to continue to receive free personal computers?” probably will see general support amongst recipients. Just how useful is such biased data?
Are GPA’s statistically or significantly up this year at the four main schools? Is there a quantitative diminution of D’s and F’s amongst those 4,500 students? Do all teachers, when asked anonymously and free from any pressure from above, support how the laptop initiative was implemented? Are classroom dynamics and learning better by independent assessment? Is there a jump in the number of seniors being accepted to top-tier universities? Did last spring’s WASL scores (seventh grade) quantitatively soar? Will this year’s WASL scores (seventh and 10th grade) quantitatively soar? By the way, what is the true total number of laptops stolen already? Has there been a 20 or 30 percent increase in potential employers starting to scout seniors who are now great at PowerPoint even though their reading, writing and arithmetic may have suffered a tad?
For the tens upon tens of millions of dollars, is the experiment an unqualified success? What is the data read-out used to support that conclusion?
Raymond Koelling
Lake Forest Park
Responsibility, not excuses
Everyone can help restore sense of hope
Having grown up in the turbulent ’60s and at an age where one is given the opportunity to exercise perfect hindsight vision, I’ve come to realize that true leadership is about creating a sense of hope. Unfortunately, few leaders emerge with the charisma or skills necessary to give those feeling excluded from life’s opportunities a sense of hope — hope that their tomorrow will be better than their today.
Leadership of hope is an attribute exhibited by a select few — Martin Luther King Jr., George Washington, John Kennedy, Abe Lincoln. So rarely do such personalities emerge that anyone exhibiting such characteristics instantly becomes a darling to the press and (usually) rapidly fades under the scrutiny of fame.
Common to these leaders was their unique ability to replace the populace’s cynicism of government (and life) with the belief that tomorrow will be better! It is important not to overlook that included in these messages of hope was the theme of responsibility — a responsibility to participate; a responsibility to oneself and to others.
In today’s society we seem to be losing sight of the greatness of this country and its people. I say stand firm, take heart and become a positive part of your community. That’s the path for a better tomorrow. Teach responsibility, not excuses. Become a local leader of hope. Believe and work toward a better tomorrow and through your actions it will come.
Without a doubt we have had some remarkable leaders over the past 40 years. My hope is that once more in my lifetime I have the privilege to see greatness. As our elected leaders converge in Olympia and the race for the White House begins, seek leadership of hope. Demand it. Expect it. Respect it.
Ron Ledford
Marysville
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.