The fine print of a ‘vast majority’

WASHINGTON — The vast majority of Americans listening to the vast majority of words coming out of Jay Carney’s mouth would find it a vastly confusing user experience.

The presidential press secretary has spent a week or so trying to explain what White House officials mean when they say the beleaguered HealthCare.gov website will “work smoothly for the vast majority of users” by month’s end.

A “vast majority” would presumably be somewhere between a bare majority of 51 percent and an overwhelming majority of, say, 99 percent — but officials had refused to say. My Washington Post colleagues Amy Goldstein and Juliet Eilperin solved the mystery, reporting over the weekend that a vast majority, as defined in secret by the Obama administration, is 80 percent.

Carney, at his briefing Monday, didn’t deny the figure but did his best to qualify it with all sorts of asterisks and fine print about metrics and baskets and site stability and users’ experiences and navigators and channels and something about a continuum. Sticking closely to his written notes for the briefing, he explained that although some of the 20 percent who couldn’t get HealthCare.gov to work would have technical troubles, others might have complicated circumstances or would simply prefer to sign up on the phone, in person or even by mail.

Nedra Pickler of the Associated Press pointed out that if Amazon or Kayak couldn’t serve 20 percent of their customers, “they probably wouldn’t stay in business very long.”

“You’re looking at that statistic simplistically,” Carney informed her.

CBS News’ Major Garrett asked Carney for his opinion on whether 80 percent qualifies as a vast majority.

“Others can decide whether or not 80 percent is a vast majority,” the spokesman said, before reverting to a discussion of “technical metrics” that are apparently very difficult to grasp. “I’m a layman here,” Carney explained.

But he assured everybody that there would be “improvements to the website so that more and more Americans, up to a vast majority and beyond — because this work will continue — have an acceptable experience online.”

Up to and beyond a vast majority?

If your head hurts, Carney is doing his job.

Much of the trouble surrounding the Obamacare rollout can be traced to a single sentence President Obama voiced repeatedly: If you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it. This is not so, and White House officials knew it at the time, but Obama skipped the fine print and qualifiers.

Now Carney, determined to avoid making another promise that can’t be kept, is all fine print and qualifiers.

He admitted that the administration had learned that “passage of that legislation is only half the battle, and implementation of it is just as — in fact, more important.” But he was careful not to say anything that might come back to bite him. Yes, the administration is trying to find alternatives to HealthCare.gov to enroll people in the exchanges but “this was always going to be the case.”

It was an unusually brief briefing, scheduled for 1 p.m., then moved to 1:30. When Carney walked out at 2, he announced that he was “aiming for a 2:45 wrap here. Let’s go.” When 2:45 arrived, he announced, “I got to run.” Several hands were left waving. Not that more questioning would have induced Carney to say anything declarative.

When asked about reports of an impending staff shake-up, Carney said there would be no “Monday morning quarterbacking here.”

When Bloomberg News’ Margaret Talev asked about a new round of rumors, reported by The Washington Post’s Al Kamen, that top Obama adviser Pete Rouse was ready to go, Carney answered: “I don’t have any personnel announcements to make.” When CNN’s Jim Acosta asked about predictions by former White House officials that staff changes would be coming, Carney repeated that “Monday morning quarterbacking is not what we’re engaged in.”

No, what he is engaged in is defining a “vast majority” in a way that doesn’t commit the White House to a promise it can’t keep.

Fox News’ Ed Henry asked if the “vast majority” standard could be lowered to 60 percent or 70 percent.

Carney droned on about “the context in which these metrics are being described.”

If 80 percent is the hurdle for success, NBC’s Peter Alexander asked, how would failure be defined?

“Well,” the spokesman said, “I think we’ve said that we are making improvements so that it will function effectively for the vast majority of users.”

Yes, he did mention something about that.

Dana Milbank is a Washington Post columnist.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 10

A sketchy look at the newss of the day.… Continue reading

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Social Security’s good news? Bad news delayed a bit

Congress has a little additional time to make sure Social Security is solvent. It shouldn’t waste it.

Schwab: The Everett Clinic lost more than name in two sales

The original clinic’s physician-owners had their squabbles but always put patient care first.

Bret Stephens: Why Zionists like me can thank campus protesters

Their stridency may have ‘sharpened the contradictions,’ but it drove more away from their arguments.

Saunders: Voters need to elect fiscal watchdogs to Congress

Few in Washington, D.C., seem serious about the threat posed by the national debt. It’s time for a change.

Charles Blow: Will young voters stick with Biden despite rift?

Campus protests look to peel away young voters for Biden, but time and reality may play in his favor.

Michalle Goldberg: Why senators need to stop anti-semitism act

The application of a standard against anti-semitism was meant as tool, not a basis for legislation.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Nicholas Kristof: Biden must press Israel on Gaza relief

With northern Gaza in a ‘full-blown famine,’ the U.S. must use its leverage to reopen crossings to aid trucks.

David French: Greene, MAGA crowd not as powerful as they think

Speaker Mike Johnson and some Republicans are finding they can stand against the party’s fringe.

Jamelle Bouie: Trump will require one thing of a running mate

Most presidential candidates seek to balance the ticket; for Trump it’s loyalty and a willingness to lie.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.