A new school year; same old funding woes

This week is the real start of the new year.

Parents take their five-year-olds to their first day of kindergarten, kids return to new grades and new expectations, high schools gear up for football and cross country and soccer, the weather turns colder and wetter, the days are shorter, and our teachers renew their calling and mission to educate the children of our state.

One out of every 7 people in our state is a public K-12 student. In Snohomish County, over 130,000 kids are in the public school system, ranging from 45 in Index to 20,000 each in the Everett, Edmonds, and Northshore school districts.

Just as democracy is not perfect, public schools, the foundation of our democracy, are not perfect either. Our state government has consistently underfunded public education, in violation of its paramount constitutional duty — and that’s not me speaking, but our state Supreme Court.

It would take $3.5 billion a year more at the minimum to appropriately reduce class size, pay our teachers better, and offer more courses and choices and opportunities for students. That may sound like a lot of money, and it is, but it is also only about $17 a day more per student. The Legislature wants us to believe that they are fully funding education, but only by ignoring the $100,000 a day fine that the state Supreme Court has laid on the Legislature for its failure to fund education, and by amending and delaying the initiative to lower class sizes that the people approved just 10 months ago. That’s hardly full funding, that’s simply a mischievous and misleading narrative.

One huge barrier to funding public education is the opposition of the very wealthy as a class to an income tax that they would have to pay. (This doesn’t hold true for some wealthy individuals, who support income taxes and full funding for education.) A tactic to distract the conversation from full funding for all students to targeted funding for a very small percentage of students was the initiative for charter schools in 2012. That was bankrolled by billionaires to the tune of $11 million. It was passed with 50.69 percent of the vote. As it happens, it was an initiative that violates our state constitution, and has now been thrown out by the state Supreme Court.

Public schools aren’t perfect. In a world where we expect students to progress beyond high school into college, the data is discouraging. In the Arlington School District, 51 percent of high school graduates went onto college or community college in 2013. That means that nearly half didn’t. In 2008, 60 percent went onto college. In Everett 64 percent of graduates in 2013 went on to college. Fully one third did not. In Stanwood, 55 percent of graduates went to college in 2014, in Monroe 53 percent, in Lake Stevens 60 percent, in Marysville 51 percent.

We are obviously leaving a lot of kids behind. And yet, Initiative 1351, which would have reduced class sizes in high school as well as elementary school, was left completely unfunded by the Legislature.

Do small classes only make sense for elementary kids? Perhaps we can take a lesson from the private school where the elite send their kids — Lakeside School in Seattle. The average class size for this middle school and high school: 16. Average class size in our public high schools: 30.

Here is a lesson: If you want to neglect students, increase drop-outs, and have high school be the final stop in education, then increase class size. On the other hand, if you want students to know that teachers know who they are, care about them, expect more of them, challenge them, discipline them, and will help them succeed, then look to Lakeside and decrease class sizes. You can’t hide in a room of 15 kids.

One problem: This costs money.

Our Legislature has shrugged and put this off for too long. So we start this new school year with optimism and hope, and continual underfunding. The legislature says it supports K-12 education. But as citizens, and for the sake of our kids and our future, we should say: “Show me the money.”

John Burbank is the executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute, www.eoionline.org. Email him at john@eoionline.org.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Tom Burke: Don’t know much about history? Better start reading

Reading — anything — matters, but especially before an election with history-making consequences.

Where did Carolyn Hax advice column go?

Recently the Herald has replaced the Carolyn Hax column with Dear Abby.… Continue reading

Why did The Herald add an astrology column in print?

We live in times when accurate information and good science are vital.… Continue reading

Plastics are vital to health care

Regarding a recent letter warning about plastic pollution: For the past six… Continue reading

Climate change, nuclear war threat to life on earth

There is one sentinel topic that has received minimal media attention in… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.