Viewpoints: Quantifying the risk that bacon will kill you

You have of course heard the sad news about bacon. As the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer put it Monday in a news release:

“The experts concluded that each 50 gram portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent.”

How much is 50 grams of processed meat? In bacon terms it’s about two slices. Just to be clear, it isn’t that eating two pieces of bacon will increase your colorectal cancer risk by 18 percent. It’s that eating two pieces of bacon every day for the rest of your life will.

But here’s the important question that isn’t directly addressed in the pages and pages of information released Monday by the IARC or in any of the subsequent news coverage that I read: What’s the risk of colorectal cancer to begin with?

To illustrate how much this can matter: In 1995, the U.K.’s Committee on Safety in Medicines issued a warning that third-generation oral contraceptive pills increased the risk of thrombosis by 100 percent. What that meant was that the risk of getting thrombosis — potentially life-threatening blood clots in the legs or lungs — went from 1 in 7,000 for women taking second-generation birth control pills to 2 in 7,000 for those taking the third-generation variety.

Not a huge risk, then. But a 100 percent risk increase sounds quite ominous. As psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer describes in his book “Risk Savvy,” the warning scared many women away from the pill. One result was an estimated 13,000 additional abortions the following year in England and Wales. Another was, ironically, a lot of thrombosis cases — pregnancies and abortions are much more likely to bring on the condition than does taking a third-generation birth control pill.

Information about relative risk can be misleading, then, unless it’s presented in the context of absolute risk. So what’s the absolute risk of getting colorectal cancer? To sum up tables from the National Cancer Institute, men 60 and younger face an almost 5 percent chance of getting colorectal cancer in their lifetimes, and a greater than 2 percent chance of dying from it. For women it’s about 4.5 percent and 1.9 percent.

Colorectal cancer, then, is a relatively common and deadly disease. It tends to hit people later in life, when they’re eventually going to die of something in any case. But still, it’s worth trying to avoid. Let’s say you’re a man, you have about a 5 percent chance of eventually getting colorectal cancer, and you up your bacon consumption by two pieces a day. That increases your cancer risk to almost 6 percent — not a trivial jump.

Unlike the ill-advised and since-revoked U.S. dietary recommendations against cholesterol, these processed-meat cancer-risk estimates are based on years and years of empirical research. The 18 percent figure comes from a 2011 meta-analysis, published in the open-source journal PLOS One, of nine different studies of colorectal cancer.

It’s just an estimate, and it’s always possible that other things that processed-meat eaters tend to do — such as standing around grills full of burning charcoal — raise their cancer risk. Still, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to make changes in your diet based on this evidence (and similar but weaker evidence on the link between red meat and cancer). I like bacon a lot, but I’d rather have a 5 in 100 chance of getting colorectal cancer than a 6 in 100 chance. Good on the World Health Organization for getting the word out. What I don’t understand, though, is why they didn’t present the risks in those terms.

Justin Fox is a Bloomberg View columnist writing about business.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Tom Burke: Don’t know much about history? Better start reading

Reading — anything — matters, but especially before an election with history-making consequences.

Where did Carolyn Hax advice column go?

Recently the Herald has replaced the Carolyn Hax column with Dear Abby.… Continue reading

Why did The Herald add an astrology column in print?

We live in times when accurate information and good science are vital.… Continue reading

Plastics are vital to health care

Regarding a recent letter warning about plastic pollution: For the past six… Continue reading

Climate change, nuclear war threat to life on earth

There is one sentinel topic that has received minimal media attention in… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.