Are we procrastinating or just prioritizing?

I came upon this article on procrastination and saved it for “later reading.” Ha-ha-ha. Procrastination jokes are one of the best ways of putting off work.

The article’s headline reads, “To Stop Procrastinating, Start by Understanding the Emotions Involved.” It appears in The Wall Street Journal, a good source of pointers on getting us gerbils to beef up our output.

Before we get to the thesis, let me offer this subversive idea: Many who see themselves as procrastinators aren’t really procrastinating. They don’t get around to certain assignments because they are trying to complete other assignments.

Procrastination is defined as voluntarily delaying to do something, thus resulting in future negative consequences. Researchers at Stockholm University believe that chronic procrastination is an emotional strategy for dealing with stress, according to the Journal.

Houseguests and dry plants are time-honored excuses for procrastinating. But some less obvious activities, such as going to the gym, also qualify, the researchers concluded. Procrastinators are doing other not-entirely-pleasant activities as “moral compensation” for not doing job No. 1.

In a similar vein, horror novelist Stephen King once said that calling procrastination research is “the scholar’s greatest weakness.” Procrastinators know all the tricks.

We’ve often heard that procrastinators are perfectionists, that they put off tasks thinking themselves unable at present to operate at virtuoso level. They may assume the magic wand of genius will boing them tomorrow.

But that’s wrong, according to the researchers. It’s not perfectionism but impulsiveness. Anxiety pushes people who are not impulsive into action. But anxiety pushes people who are impulsive “to shut down.”

Thus, better time management is not the fix for procrastinators. Emotional regulation is.

Regulate the emotions? We all can do that, right?

First we have to get past denial, a defense mechanism allowing us to ignore certain information in order to avoid painful thoughts.

Next we must deal with avoidance, withdrawing from undesirable situations rather than dealing with them directly.

We must work through our ambivalence, the coexistence of contradictory beliefs or emotions toward one thing.

So much to work on. And how many deadlines will have flown by in the time it takes to conquer one’s counterproductive patterns of emotional reactions? Coping mechanisms don’t come in a pill, I don’t think.

Anyhow, there are some tried-and-true means of countering procrastination. One is setting sub-goals — that is, breaking the job into smaller pieces. (Be sure to reward yourself for meeting each sub-goal.)

Set a timer for a specified number of minutes or hours, and vow to sit there till it goes off. That’s what Ingmar Bergman did when the Swedish director suffered writer’s block.

Another is to just suck it up and start the darn project. That sounds pretty obvious, but it is on the Journal’s list of solutions.

Novelist Sinclair Lewis wrote, “NOW is a fact that cannot be dodged.” Of course, his “now” didn’t demand posting on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Pinterest — nor did he have to respond to a load of email that would never have come his way in the form of written letters.

Mars has almost a 25-hour day, but until we humans populate the Red Planet, we’re stuck with 24 hours. To go back to my earlier idea, I’m not sure 30-hour days would be enough to do all that’s expected from many of us.

Overwork may be the problem. If so, labeling an inability to get it all done as “procrastination” is merely blaming the victim.

Email Froma Harrop at fharrop@gmail.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Tom Burke: Don’t know much about history? Better start reading

Reading — anything — matters, but especially before an election with history-making consequences.

Where did Carolyn Hax advice column go?

Recently the Herald has replaced the Carolyn Hax column with Dear Abby.… Continue reading

Why did The Herald add an astrology column in print?

We live in times when accurate information and good science are vital.… Continue reading

Plastics are vital to health care

Regarding a recent letter warning about plastic pollution: For the past six… Continue reading

Climate change, nuclear war threat to life on earth

There is one sentinel topic that has received minimal media attention in… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.