Will history or the law judge CIA’s interrogations as illegal torture?

WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on harsh treatment of detainees prompted renewed calls for legal action against CIA officers, but the Obama administration on Tuesday questioned the need for criminal prosecution.

No prosecutions would be warranted if the intelligence officers were carrying out U.S. government policy and following legal guidance, said senior White House officials who briefed reporters, speaking on condition of anonymity as a matter of policy. They further noted that a Justice Department special prosecutor declined to prosecute after an earlier investigation.

“We’re not going to aim to hold them accountable if they’re operating within the guidelines they’ve been given,” one of the officials said. The official added, “The Department of Justice has taken a broader look at this program and has made their own determination not to pursue prosecution.”

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Nonetheless, the vivid and gruesome details revealed Tuesday in the committee’s 525-page summary triggered demands for civil or criminal proceedings, both in the United States and abroad. Vice President Joe Biden and White House press secretary Josh Earnest both indicated a decision is up to the Justice Department.

If legal actions proceed, they certainly wouldn’t be quick.

“It could take 10 or 15 years to even begin to get accountability,” noted J. Wells Dixon, senior staff attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights. “If accountability doesn’t start now, in this administration, it could come down the road.”

The courtroom hurdles may simply be too high, leaving to history rather than a jury the final judgment for what California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chair of the intelligence panel, called the “use of brutal interrogation techniques in violation of U.S. law, treaty obligations, and our values.”

However, the Bush administration’s Justice Department provided legal cover with a series of previously secret memos that authorized the harsh interrogation techniques.

CIA officers themselves seemed cognizant of steering clear of potential legal danger, the report shows. The report cites, for instance, an Aug. 12, 2002, memo to interrogators from CIA official Jose Rodriguez.

“Strongly urge that any speculative language as to the legality of given activities or, more precisely, judgment calls as to their legality . be refrained from in written traffic (email or cable traffic),” Rodriguez wrote. “Such language is not helpful.”

Criminal prosecutions would be the most dramatic legal fallout from the report. In theory, they might involve either the interrogations or their cover-up.

“Credible allegations of torture and abuse must be fully investigated, and prosecuted where necessary,” Melina Milazzo, senior policy counsel for the Center for Victims of Torture, said Tuesday, “and victims of torture should be provided an effective right to a remedy, including the right to rehabilitation.”

Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, added that “unless this important truth-telling process leads to prosecution of the officials responsible, torture will remain a policy option for future presidents.”

In practice, U.S. prosecutions seem a hard sell; not least, because those with prosecutorial powers seem loath to use them and have political reason not to.

In 2008, longtime federal prosecutor John Durham was appointed to investigate whether a top CIA officer broke the law by destroying videotapes showing the waterboarding of two detainees. In 2010, Durham announced no charges would be brought. Durham also investigated the deaths of two detainees. Again, no charges were brought.

Congress, moreover, has gone out of its way to protect interrogators from both civil and criminal liability.

In a 2005 law, Congress spelled out that U.S. interrogators could use as a defense in a civil or criminal case the fact that they did not know the interrogation practices were unlawful. Relying on the “advice of counsel” is specified as an “important factor” in determining what the interrogator knew.

Congress added more protections in a 2006 law, declaring that the federal government must pay for attorneys and other costs associated with defending interrogators in civil or criminal proceedings. In the same law, Congress gutted judicial authority over the handling of suspected terrorists.

The 2006 law states “no court, justice or judge” could hear challenges to “any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement” of alleged enemy combatants. Citing this law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2012 dismissed a lawsuit filed by family members of three detainees who died at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Still, the sheer scope of the Senate’s investigation begun in 2009, and the vivid details included in the executive summary, rekindles legal debate. The committee’s report concludes the CIA misled Congress and the White House, which could raise questions about false statements or obstruction.

“The committee based its analysis on reading 6 million pages of documents,” noted Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel of the American Civil Liberties Union. “From how the Durham investigation seemed to be conducted, it did not appear like he did the kind of investigation the committee did.”

Anders added that Obama’s stated preference to look “forward, not back” on the CIA question was a “convenient formula at the beginning of his presidency” but may no longer be sustainable in the wake of compelling reports.

Obama himself inadvertently suggested one legal route, at least rhetorically, when on Aug. 1 he opined that “we tortured some folks.” Torture is illegal, and the United States is among 155 countries to sign the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which defines it as inflicting “severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental.”

The treaty excludes from the torture definition “pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions,” which is a phrase open to interpretation.

“It’s an international treaty obligation,” noted Dixon of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “If a state is unwilling or unable to prosecute, other countries (can).”

The European Court of Human Rights ruled in July that Poland violated its international obligations by allowing U.S. officials to detain and torture two men at a secret Polish site. The court ordered Poland to pay a total of $300,000 to the two men: Abu Zubaydah, suspected of running an al-Qaida facility in Pakistan, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, believed to have planned the attack on the USS Cole.

Both men are being held at the U.S. facility at Guantanamo Bay.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

Everett Historic Theater owner Curtis Shriner inside the theater on Tuesday, May 13, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Historic Everett Theatre sale on horizon, future uncertain

With expected new ownership, events for July and August will be canceled. The schedule for the fall and beyond is unclear.

Contributed photo from Snohomish County Public Works
Snohomish County Public Works contractor crews have begun their summer 2016 paving work on 13 miles of roadway, primarily in the Monroe and Stanwood areas. This photo is an example of paving work from a previous summer. A new layer of asphalt is put down over the old.
Snohomish County plans to resurface about 76 miles of roads this summer

EVERETT – As part of its annual road maintenance and preservation program,… Continue reading

City of Everett Engineer Tom Hood, left, and City of Everett Engineer and Project Manager Dan Enrico, right, talks about the current Edgewater Bridge demolition on Friday, May 9, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
How do you get rid of a bridge? Everett engineers can explain.

Workers began dismantling the old Edgewater Bridge on May 2. The process could take one to two months, city engineers said.

Smoke from the Bolt Creek fire silhouettes a mountain ridge and trees just outside of Index on Sept. 12, 2022. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
County will host two wildfire-preparedness meetings in May

Meetings will allow community members to learn wildfire mitigation strategies and connect with a variety of local and state agencies.

Helion's 6th fusion prototype, Trenta, on display on Tuesday, July 9, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Helion celebrates smoother path to fusion energy site approval

Helion CEO applauds legislation signed by Gov. Bob Ferguson expected to streamline site selection process.

Vehicles travel along Mukilteo Speedway on Sunday, April 21, 2024, in Mukilteo, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Mukilteo cameras go live to curb speeding on Speedway

Starting Friday, an automated traffic camera system will cover four blocks of Mukilteo Speedway. A 30-day warning period is in place.

Carli Brockman lets her daughter Carli, 2, help push her ballot into the ballot drop box on the Snohomish County Campus on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Here’s who filed for the primary election in Snohomish County

Positions with three or more candidates will go to voters Aug. 5 to determine final contenders for the Nov. 4 general election.

The Everett City Council on Wednesday, April 16, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett City Council approves apprenticeship ordinance

The new ordinance builds upon state law, requiring many city public works contracts to use at least 15% apprentice labor.

Logo for news use featuring the municipality of Stanwood in Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Stanwood nears completion of deployable floodwall

The new floodwall will provide quick protection to the downtown area during flood conditions.

Cars drive along Cathcart Way next to the site of the proposed Eastview Village development that borders Little Cedars Elementary on Wednesday, May 7, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Former engineer: Snohomish County rushed plans for Eastview development

David Irwin cited red flags from the developers. After he resigned, the county approved the development that’s now stalled with an appeal

Steven M. Falk / The Philadelphia Inquirer / Tribune News Service
James Taylor plays Sunday and Monday at Chateau Ste. Michelle in Woodinville.
A&E Calendar for May 22

Send calendar submissions for print and online to features@heraldnet.com. To ensure your… Continue reading

Members of Washington State patrol salute the casket of slain trooper Chris Gadd during a memorial cremony on Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at Angel of the Winds Arena in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Opening statements begin in trial of man charged in crash of WSP trooper

Deputy prosecutor described to jurors what began as a routine patrol for Christopher Gadd — “until it wasn’t.”

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.