Comment: Raising stamp prices won’t solve USPS financial woes

The consistent increases in prices is driving customers away. There are better options for the service.

By David Williams / For The Baltimore Sun

It’s hard to keep track of ever-increasing stamp prices. This month, the U.S. Postal Service proposed hiking stamp prices in July from 68 cents to 73 cents, a 7.4 percent increase.

In January, USPS hiked the price of first-class Forever stamps from 66 cents to 68 cents. Six months earlier, the agency raised prices from 63 cents to 66 cents. And six months before that, stamp prices increased from 60 cents to 63 cents. Postal leadership claims that these painful pricing changes are necessary to get the USPS back into the black. But, according to a new report by the non-profit postal watchdog “Keep US Posted,” this revenue-raising gambit is sorely misguided.

The USPS cannot solve its dire fiscal issues by gouging hard-working taxpayers and consumers.

America’s mail carrier has tried and failed to use the power of mathematics to figure out pricing. For all the variables that go into the USPS’ pricing equations, the agency completely misses the mark on demand elasticity. Postal bureaucrats assume that, even if the agency continues to hike prices, consumers will have no choice but to keep buying stamps at inflated rates. They are wrong.

In the age of the World Wide Web (and prison-bound carrier pigeons), switching away from high-priced stamps is easier than the USPS would like to believe. According to Keep US Posted’s report, “under the current process, the USPS proposes new rate increases before the impact of prior increases can be fully realized. USPS demand models, which are used to justify rate increases, have never been tested in this way. USPS stands to lose considerably from miscalculating its customers’ sensitivity to price.” Keep US Posted estimates that these flawed revenue projections cost the USPS $1.8 billion annually, or roughly one-third of the agency’s $6.5 billion net loss for fiscal year 2023.

The USPS should change its entire forecasting process and embrace greater transparency in pricing stamps. According to Keep US Posted, every January, the “USPS publishes its new demand equations and documentation. In FY2024 there were 63 items in its change log. Such extensive modifications show the large degree of subjectivity when estimating the model.”

The USPS should at least explain why such large-scale changes are justified and how such alterations will lead to improved accuracy. Additionally, it’s best practice for researchers to publish a “sensitivity analysis” showing how changes in forecast design (i.e., which variables are included and excluded) can lead to different results. The USPS has failed to explain this, and as a result, researchers have little insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the postal forecasting process.

Most importantly, America’s mail carrier should finally admit that stamp price hikes are not effective for raising revenue. Instead of trying to squeeze more revenue out of taxpayers and consumers, the USPS should take a second look at its costly spending and discounting programs.

One problematic program is the “workshare discount” initiative. Each year, the USPS showers $15 billion-worth of discounts on private businesses that perform mailing-related work (e.g., pre-sorting and bar-coding mail) on behalf of the USPS. The basic idea of farming out postal operations and allowing private players to pocket the savings is a solid one, but only if the postage discounts correspond to actual savings. Even though nearly 90 percent of market-dominant mail (i.e., letters and marketing mail) is workshared, the USPS Office of the Inspector General has found documented savings to be sorely lacking.

According to a February 2024 IG report, the USPS “does not have detailed procedures that document responsibilities for calculating avoided costs and workshare discounts for First-Class Mail and Marketing Mail letters and enable management to effectively monitor those control activities.”

In addition, the USPS fails to regularly monitor data inputs that go into its workshare discount pricing models. In other words, the USPS is asking taxpayers and consumers to take a leap of faith and trust that it is properly extending $15 billion in discounts based on mailing companies saving the USPS money.

The USPS needs to figure out a better way to get on firmer fiscal footing. Reassessing workshare savings is a far more promising option than perpetually raising stamp prices. Postal consumers shouldn’t have to mull over carrier pigeons to get their letters and cards delivered.

David Williams (X: @tpapres) is the president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. ©2024 The Baltimore Sun, baltimoresun.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A Microsoft data center campus in East Wenatchee on Nov. 3. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo / The New York Times)
Editorial: Meeting needs for data centers, fair power rates

Shared energy demand for AI and ratepayers requires an increased pace for clean energy projects.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Jan. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State must deliver on promises for state ferry system

Washington State Ferries’ crew shortages continue to cancel crucial sailings on Mukilteo-Clinton… Continue reading

State can’t tax income if robots take jobs

A recent Herald Forum commentary was essentially about how, “Everyone knows that… Continue reading

Comment: What Vance doesn’t get about ‘heritage’ or Americans

Ask the Founders or many who fought for the nation, immigrants are in every sense American.

Comment: Why Trump isn’t likely to back democracy in Venezuela

Based on Trump’s stated desire for control of the country’s oil, his best bet is its current autocracy.

Comment: Are we trending toward another devastating Dust Bowl?

It’s not a certainty, but heat and drought are more frequent in the U.S., upping the odds of the disaster’s return.

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Washington state's Congressional Districts adopted in 2021. (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: Lawmakers shouldn’t futz with partisan redistricting

A new proposal to allow state lawmakers to gerrymander congressional districts should be rejected.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: Work as a young caddy allowed a swing at life skills

Along with learning blackjack, Yiddish and golf’s finer points, it taught the art of observation.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.