Imagine a major TV news organization reporting in respectful tones on the scientific merits of phrenology (the study of human skulls to determine intelligence) or alchemy (medieval experiments to turn base metals into gold).
That’s akin to what ABC News did in “Jesus, Mary and Da Vinci,” which was broadcast Nov. 3. With a straight face, correspondent Elizabeth Vargas examined whether Jesus Christ married Mary Magdalene and sired children who moved with Mom to France and established a royal bloodline that exists to this day.
Huh?
ABC’s production displayed how the TV news business has become show business, erasing the lines between fiction and fact and between information and entertainment. A New York Times critic said ABC mixed “fable with history in an absurdist way” that was “both amusingly audacious and profoundly irritating.”
After an hour toying with the idea of a married Jesus, Vargas acknowledged: “We didn’t find any proof.” Not surprising, since nobody ever has.
On its face, the rumor is historically implausible. As former Boston Mayor Ray Flynn observed, to buy this you’d have to believe that “four Gospel writers and thousands of eyewitnesses somehow missed the fact that Jesus had a wife and a child.”
The program ran in prime time during ratings sweeps for one reason: the hot sales for novelist Dan Brown’s latest thriller “The Da Vinci Code,” which promotes the Mrs. Jesus yarn. Even President and Laura Bush read the thing.
Brown’s scenario of conspiracies and codes treats the Catholic clergy like a pack of sinister liars who covered up truth. He recycles propaganda from folks who dislike orthodox Christianity and favor the ancient world’s rival secret-knowledge (“Gnostic”) sects.
ABC might have avoided embarrassment by scanning the article “Dismantling the Da Vinci Code” in Crisis, a conservative Catholic magazine. Freelance writer Sandra Miesel provided one of the few serious historical analyses of this pop culture phenomenon.
That’s important because Brown’s novel purports to draw upon historical research, though much of it came from Gnostic fans. A few of Miesel’s contentions:
On ABC, it was disconcerting to see professors lending the prestige of Harvard, Notre Dame and Princeton alongside opinions from novelist Brown and other personalities with murky scholarly credentials who left debatable points unanswered. Vargas did, however, allow two sober evangelicals to join the talking heads.
Conservatives predictably panned the show. William Lane Craig of California’s Talbot School of Theology called it “historically worthless” and Flynn accused ABC and the news media in general of “anti-Christian bigotry.”
ABC denied bias and defended its show as “thoughtful and objective.” In an interview with beliefnet.com, Vargas cited her youthful attendance at Catholic catechism class and weekly Mass and said she had her son baptized (he’s being raised as both Catholic and Jewish).
It’s disheartening to recall that ABC, to its credit, was formerly the only network news shop with a qualified religion specialist.
Copyright ©2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
