Boeing’s design of a car called the PA-3. With World War II winding down and soldiers returning to civilian life, Boeing looked for products to sell vets in peacetime. It designed a car, a van, modular housing units and even kitchen appliances. In the end, the company stuck with what it knew: airplanes. (Boeing Co.)

Boeing’s design of a car called the PA-3. With World War II winding down and soldiers returning to civilian life, Boeing looked for products to sell vets in peacetime. It designed a car, a van, modular housing units and even kitchen appliances. In the end, the company stuck with what it knew: airplanes. (Boeing Co.)

A car, a space plane … Boeing ideas that didn’t pan out

The Boeing Co. is turning 100 on July 15. Throughout the year, The Daily Herald is covering the people, airplanes and moments that define The Boeing Century. More about this series

Boeing engineers are constantly generating new product ideas. Some are better than others. Some are bold and push the boundaries of what’s possible. Others seem inspired by science fiction. And some sound silly today.

The aerospace giant’s innovations are ideas that panned out. Here are some that did not.

Model 326

The clipper of tomorrow never arrived.

In 1937, Pan American Airways wanted an amphibian capable of safely flying nonstop from America to Europe. Boeing proposed its double-decker Model 326, a six-engine clipper with room for 100 passengers. The enormous plane was to be an ocean liner in the sky, complete with luxurious lounges for passengers to relax in during the long trip across the Atlantic Ocean. The Model 326 would have been the first pressurized airliner. However, Pan Am did not pick any of the four competing designs. And the first pressurized airliner became the Boeing 307 Stratoliner, which entered service in 1939.

As late as 1942, Flight magazine referred to the Model 326 as the “clipper of tomorrow.”

PA-3

It looked like a cartoon car, but it was a very real idea — and it almost became reality.

During World War II, Boeing and its competitors had focused on making warplanes. With the war winding down and soldiers returning to civilian life, Boeing looked for products to sell to vets in peacetime. It designed a car, a van, modular housing units and even kitchen appliances. In the end, the company stuck with what it knew — airplanes.

While the U.S. military canceled most orders for warplanes after 1945, Boeing kept busier than most of its competitors thanks to continued demand for the B-29 and its new, jet-powered B-47 Stratojet bomber, which first flew Dec. 17, 1947.

X-20 Dyna-Soar

It was a reusable space plane that no one ever used.

In the late 1950s, the U.S. Air Force wanted to fly to the stars. Boeing’s design, the X-20 Dyna-Soar, beat out eight competitors. It was designed to be flown both as an airplane in Earth’s atmosphere and as a spacecraft — just like the space shuttle a quarter-century later.

In 1960, the Air Force picked seven astronauts, including Neil Armstrong, for the X-20 program. The first space flight was tentatively scheduled for early 1965.

The Dyna-Soar never made it past the mock-up stage. Congress opted to shift the X-20’s budget to the Gemini program.

The Air Force had already spent $410 million — about $3.2 billion today — on mock-ups before the X-20 was canceled. Research for the program later influenced the development of the space shuttle.

2707

In the mid-1960s, the future of air travel was clearly supersonic. At least, that was what many folks thought. Boeing and Lockheed vied for a federal contract to develop a supersonic transport (SST).

“At stake in the battle are billions of dollars, thousands of jobs, American prestige, the U.S. balance of payments and the futures of the two aircraft builders,” the Associated Press reported in 1966.

The Boeing 2707 won the contract. It was the company’s marquee program and attracted many of its best and brightest engineers.

“Our SST colleagues were clearly the haves to our have-nots,” Boeing engineer Joe Sutter wrote in his book, “747: Creating the World’s First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation.”

Boeing’s other development programs at the time — the 737 and 747 — had to fight for whatever resources the 2707 did not command.

The Boeing 2707 would have held about 275 passengers, making it roughly twice as big as the Concorde. The program had more orders than the Concorde, too — 122 from 26 customers.

However, interest waned due to environmental concerns and rising fuel prices. Boeing canceled the program after Congress pulled its support in 1971.

Double-deck 747

The Boeing 747 began as a full double-deck airplane, essentially two 707 fuselages stacked on top of each other. That design would not allow it to carry much cargo, and the plane would have been hard to evacuate in an emergency. So Boeing switched to a single-deck design. To do so, it had to get launch customer Pan American Airways on board.

Boeing’s Milt Heinemann flew to New York and convinced Pan Am’s leadership to consider one wide deck. Pan Am agreed to consider both designs. Boeing made mock-ups of each, which the airline’s execs inspected in Renton.

The trip convinced Pan Am president Juan Trippe that a single, spacious deck was the better design.

767-X

By the 1980s, European airplane maker Airbus had made significant inroads into the twin-aisle jetliner market. Boeing engineers searched for a response.

“The 767 was starting to lose some campaigns against the A330, so we knew we needed to do something,” Boeing Vice President Lars Andersen told The Daily Herald in Everett in 2015. In the ’80s, he was part of the 767 program. Boeing’s first responses were bigger versions of the 767, including one with a partial second deck at the rear of the plane. The awkward-looking plane was nicknamed the “Hunchback of Mukilteo.”

Airline executives weren’t interested in the Hunchback, though. So Boeing opted for an all-new airplane, which became the 777.

777-100

When the 777 first flew in 1995, it was a 777-200. So why didn’t Boeing make a 777-100?

That designation was used for a conceptual design from the late 1970s. It was a large tri-jet airliner, but Boeing shelved the project in favor of two twin-jet airplanes: the single-aisle 757 and the twin-aisle 767.

Even though the earlier tri-jet never flew, Boeing launched the 777 family with the 777-200, rather than a -100 variant.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

Olivia Vanni / The Herald 
The Mukilteo Lighthouse. Built in 1906, it’s one of the most iconic landmarks in Snohomish County.
The Mukilteo Lighthouse. Built in 1906, it’s one of the most iconic landmarks in Snohomish County. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Mukilteo mayor vetoes council-approved sales tax

The tax would have helped pay for transportation infrastructure, but was also set to give Mukilteo the highest sales tax rate in the state.

Marysville Mayor Jon Nehring gives the state of the city address at the Marysville Civic Center on Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2024, in Marysville, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Marysville council approves interim middle housing law

The council passed the regulations to prevent a state model code from taking effect by default. It expects to approve final rules by October.

x
State audit takes issue with Edmonds COVID grant monitoring

The audit report covered 2023 and is the third since 2020 that found similar issues with COVID-19 recovery grant documentation.

Bothell
Bothell man pleads guilty to sexual abuse of Marysville middle schoolers

The man allegedly sexually assaulted three students in exchange for vapes and edibles in 2022. His sentencing is set for Aug. 29.

Larsen talks proposed Medicaid cuts during Compass Health stop in Everett

Compass Health plans to open its new behavioral health center in August. Nearly all of the nonprofit’s patients rely on Medicaid.

District 2 candidates differ in public safety approach

Incumbent Paula Rhyne is facing challenger Ryan Crowther. The third candidate, Jonathan Shapiro, is no longer seeking the seat.

From left to right, Edmonds City Council Position 3 candidates Joseph Ademofe, Alex Newman and Erika Barnett.
Amid budget crisis, Edmonds City Council candidates talk revenue, affordability

Three newcomers are facing off for Position 3 on the council, currently held by council President Neil Tibbott.

Community members gather for the dedication of the Oso Landslide Memorial following the ten-year remembrance of the slide on Friday, March 22, 2024, at the Oso Landslide Memorial in Oso, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
The Daily Herald garners 6 awards from regional journalism competition

The awards recognize the best in journalism from media outlets across Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington.

Everett
Everett approves new fines for non-emergency lifts

The fire department will only issue fines for non-emergency lift assists at licensed care facilities, not for individuals at home calling 911.

Guns for sale at Caso’s Gun-A-Rama in Jersey City, New Jersey, which has been open since 1967. (Photo by Aristide Economopoulos/New Jersey Monitor)
After suing, WA gets carveout from Trump administration plan to return gun conversion devices

The Trump administration has agreed to not distribute devices that turn semi-automatic… Continue reading

The Wild Horse Wind and Solar Facility about 16 miles east of Ellensburg in central Washington is part of Puget Sound Energy’s clean energy portfolio. (Courtesy of Puget Sound Energy)
Megabill’s elimination of tax credits for clean energy projects could cost WA $8.7 billion

Washington households could see electricity costs increase $115 per year by 2029; 21,800 workers could lose their jobs by 2030, analysts say.

Everett mayor candidates focus on affordability, city budget in costly race

As incumbent Cassie Franklin seeks a third term in office, three candidates are looking to unseat her.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.