Inslee’s carbon cap won’t happen soon

OLYMPIA — It may take Gov. Jay Inslee longer to circumvent lawmakers and impose a cap on carbon emissions than he’s expecting.

The governor directed the Department of Ecology last week to begin developing a hard limit on emissions using his rule-making power under existing state laws.

He pledged the process would be open with plenty of opportunity for interested parties to weigh in — and he expected to be finished in about a year.

But the man leading the effort says it could take twice as long because of the complexity and controversy enveloping the issue.

Stu Clark, the air quality program manager for the Department of Ecology, said his team must craft the rule essentially from scratch as there’s no template for such a regulatory feat.

“A complex rule like this can typically take us 18 months to 24 months to do,” he said. “It must be built from the bottom up. Everybody will get their say.”

While air emissions are regulated for a handful of industries, such as pulp and paper mills, for the most part the state must figure out who will be covered by the new regulations and then what is practical and possible for them to achieve in terms of reductions, Clark said.

It is likely the eventual rule will not apply to all emitters which will add a degree of complication to the regulatory calibrations, he said. Cars, for example, are the single largest source of pollution-causing emissions but aren’t likely to be placed under any cap, he said.

Procedurally, once all that work is done and a draft rule is completed, it would be formally released. The state would then have 180 days to gather public comments at the end of which Inslee would have to decide whether to make it final.

A spokeswoman for the governor didn’t dispute Clark’s assessment of the challenge ahead though she emphasized the governor is resolved for the process to be carried out with deliberative speed.

This cap would be the centerpiece of Inslee’s efforts to combat climate change in the wake of his failed attempt to pass a cap-and-trade policy earlier this year.

“This is not his preferred approach,” said Inslee spokeswoman Jaime Smith. “I think the incentive all along has been the acknowledgement that we need to do something about this issue.”

Meanwhile Monday, President Barack Obama announced new federal rules to limit emissions from the nation’s power plants. Inslee praised the president and issued a statement saying the policy complements his approach in the state to fighting climate change.

“Here in Washington we’ll go further,” Inslee said. “We will cap carbon pollution using our state’s own Clean Air Act, we will continue to invest in clean technologies and we will promote a smarter grid and cleaner transportation alternatives.”

The cap sought by Inslee is intended to help the state meet emission limits contained in a 2007 law.

Under that law, the state must reduce its overall greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and be 50 percent below that benchmark by 2050.

Washington is making headway toward attaining the first target. In 1990, its greenhouse gas emissions totaled 88.4 million metric tons. It rose to 101.6 million metric tons in 2007 but had declined to 92 million metric tons in 2012, according to ecology department figures.

The problem with the 2007 law is it didn’t spell out how the state should meet the standards.

Earlier this year, Inslee proposed a cap-and-trade approach that lawmakers rejected. That plan targeted roughly 130 of the state’s largest polluters and would have required them to buy credits for emissions through an annual auction. Money from sales of the credits would go into the state budget.

The rule now getting developed would not charge emitters so it would not raise revenue for the budget, according to the governor’s office

Environmentalists, who cheered Inslee’s announcement as bold and decisive, said the one-year timetable is ambitious and possible.

“That is the expectation and I will hold him to that,” said Becky Kelley, president of the Washington Environmental Council. “The nature of the tool the governor has largely been forced to use is a tool he needs to use decisively.”

The state isn’t starting totally from scratch because there’s ample knowledge on sources of emissions, options for reduction and positions of the stakeholders in this debate, said Ross Macfarlane, senior ad visor at Climate Solutions in Seattle, a nonprofit that promotes clean energy and climate change policies.

“This is aggressive but not impossible,” he said. “Will it require the governor continuing to put pressure on the administration of the Department of Ecology? Absolutely.”

Business leaders are concerned that some firms will be harmed by the results if the process is too hurried.

“Without having any details, how do you go from scratch to a rule in a year?” asked Brandon Housekeeper, director of governmental affairs on environmental issues for the Association of Washington Business. “One year just seems aggressive on his part.”

Housekeeper said he’d prefer the governor use the type of collaborative approach that he did for drafting a rule for new water quality standards tied to the consumption of fish. That allowed for the full input of affected parties.

“I would argue it is going to be equally as complex, maybe more, than the water quality rule,” Housekeeper said.

That took much longer than a year to complete and the governor on Friday announced he wasn’t going to press ahead with the clean water rule.

That was “quite a different situation,” Kelley said noting adoption of the clean water rule was tied to a toxics control bill that lawmakers did not pass.

“He had constructed a grand bargain with legislators and didn’t get it,” she said. “With this, he is in control of the situation.”

Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623; jcornfield@heraldnet.com

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

Employees and patrons of the Everett Mall signed a timeline mural that traces the history of the 51-year-old indoor mall that was once considered the premier place to go shopping in the city. Thursday, March 20, 2025 (Aaron Kennedy / The Herald)
Mall mural offers nostalgic trip into the past

Past and present Everett Mall employees joined customers Thursday to view an artistic timeline of the once popular shopping mecca.

Edmonds Mayor Mike Rosen gives his State of the City address on Thursday, March 20 in Edmonds, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Edmonds mayor talks budget at 2025 State of the City

Mayor Mike Rosen discussed the city’s deficit and highlights from his first year in office.

Daron Johnson, who runs Snohomish County Scanner, stands next to his scanner setup on Tuesday, April 1 in Everett, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Snohomish County law enforcement to encrypt police airwaves

The plan for civilian police scanners to go dark pushed a host to shut down his popular breaking news feed.

Richie Gabriel, 1, jumps off the bottom of the slide as Matthew Gabriel looks down at him from the play structure at Hummingbird Hill Park on Monday, March 31, 2025 in Edmonds, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Edmonds residents show up for Hummingbird Hill Park, Frances Anderson Center

After a two-and-a-half hour public comment session, the council tabled its votes for the two comprehensive plan amendments.

Students Haddie Shorb, 9, left, and brother Elden Shorb, 11, right, lead the ground breaking at Jackson Elementary School on Tuesday, April 1, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett district breaks ground on Jackson Elementary replacement

The $54 million project will completely replace the aging elementary school. Students are set to move in by the 2026-27 school year.

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Another positive measles case identified in Snohomish County

The case was identified in an infant who likely contracted measles while traveling, the county health department said.

A Tesla drives along 41st Street on Wednesday, March 26, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Washington faces uncertain future of Clean Air Act regulations

The Trump administration’s attempt to roll back numerous vehicle pollution standards has left states wondering what’s next.

A person walks through the lot at Kia of Everett shopping for a car on Tuesday, April 1, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
‘The tariffs made me do it’: Customers move fast on cars

At one Everett dealership, customers move fast on cars ahead of Wednesday’s expected announcement on tariffs.

Public’s help needed to find missing Arlington man

The 21-year-old left the house Sunday night without his shoes, cell phone or a jacket, and was reported missing the following morning.

Will Geschke / The Herald
The Marysville Tulalip Campus on the Tulalip Reservation, where Legacy High School is located.
Marysville board votes to keep Legacy High at current location

The move rolls back a decision the school board made in January to move the alternative high school at the start of next school year.

The former Marysville City Hall building along State Avenue on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 in Marysville, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
City of Marysville, school board amend property exchange

The city will relocate its public works facility to the district’s current headquarters, which will move to the former City Hall.

Snohomish County Elections employees Alice Salcido, left and Joseph Rzeckowski, right, pull full bins of ballots from the Snohomish County Campus ballot drop box on Monday, Nov. 4, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
County to mail ballots for Edmonds, Brier elections

Registered voters should receive their ballots by April 9 for the April 22 special election.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.