Several years ago, officials at the National Security Agency sought to reassure taxpayers that the agency had long since repudiated its Vietnam-era spying on U.S. citizens.
They insisted that the movie “Enemy of the State,” which portrayed the NSA as using its formidable technology to track and eavesdrop on Americans, was the stuff of Hollywood fantasy.
Now the NSA stands accused of abetting the White House in what civil liberties activists and others describe as a frontal assault on the constitutional right to privacy.
The program reportedly traced thousands of calls from phones linked to terror suspects to and from locations in the United States, and listened in on many of those conversations – all without seeking warrants from a special foreign intelligence court. E-mails also were tracked and read, according to news reports.
“I’ve stuck up for NSA innumerable times, saying I didn’t believe they were engaged in illegal activity,” said James Bamford, author of two acclaimed books on the NSA, “The Puzzle Palace” and “Body of Secrets.” But now, he said, there is no question that the agency broke the law after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Revelations about the warrantless surveillance effort, he said, have thrown the nation’s largest and most secretive intelligence-gathering organization into turmoil.
“Most of the people I’ve dealt with there had no idea this was going on, and they were very shocked and disappointed that suddenly they’re back to where they were 30 years ago, dealing with questions of domestic spying,” he said.
The surveillance effort will be subject to congressional hearings, expected to begin in the next several weeks.
Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told The New York Times that he planned to hold hearings on the surveillance program after confirmation hearings for Judge Samuel Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court. Those hearings are expected to stretch into late January or early February.
According to reports in The New York Times and elsewhere, the NSA launched the program almost immediately after the September 2001 attacks, before President Bush issued a secret order authorizing it.
Bamford and others contend that, with or without presidential approval, the program was conducted in violation of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
That law prohibits the NSA from intercepting calls or other electronic communications to or from a U.S. citizen or resident alien without a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Bamford, who holds a law degree, said the statute was written “to prevent exactly what just happened.” Some critics are calling the president’s authorization of the program an impeachable offense.
“The eventual outcome will be a special prosecutor,” Bamford predicted. “Of course it’s an impeachable offense.”
The Bush administration, meanwhile, has stood stalwartly by the program, saying that president had the authority to authorize it based on his powers as commander in chief of the armed forces.
Not only has the White House refused to cancel the program, the government has launched an investigation against the whistle-blowers who leaked the story to the Times.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
